Klein, G.M.: Is there a standard default keyword operator? : a bibliometric analysis of processing options chosen by libraries to execute keyword searches in online public access catalogs (1994)
0.00
0.0024318986 = product of:
0.004863797 = sum of:
0.004863797 = product of:
0.009727594 = sum of:
0.009727594 = weight(_text_:a in 2200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009727594 = score(doc=2200,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2200, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2200)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a survey in which the OPACs of 67 US libraries were searched using Internet connections to determine the positional operators (AND, SAME, WITH, NEAR, ADJ) selected as the default keyword operator on each catalogue. Results indicated that there is no standard positional operator
- Type
- a
