Green, R.: Development of a relational thesaurus (1996)
0.00
0.0023790773 = product of:
0.0047581545 = sum of:
0.0047581545 = product of:
0.009516309 = sum of:
0.009516309 = weight(_text_:a in 5159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009516309 = score(doc=5159,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 5159, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5159)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Various shortcomings typically attend thesaural relationships: failure to support extended relevance relationships; lack of effort in identifying a common relational inventory across types of retrieval systems; limitation to binary relationships; inattention to relationships built into the meaning of lexical units. To counteract this failings, a preliminary inventory of relational structures underlying the ca. 1250 most frequently occuring English verbs is presented. The inventory is compact and corresponds to a combination of semantic role-based verb types as identified by Chafe (1970), and image schemata, as identified by Johnson (1987). The nature of hierarchical relationships among relational structures within the inventory is surveyed
- Type
- a