Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Folksonomies"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Peters, I.: Folksonomies : nutzergenerierte Schlagwörter als Indexierungswerkzeug für die Massen (2011) 0.01
    0.010265667 = product of:
      0.030797 = sum of:
        0.030797 = product of:
          0.061594 = sum of:
            0.061594 = weight(_text_:von in 4909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061594 = score(doc=4909,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.5054244 = fieldWeight in 4909, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4909)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die große Fülle an nutzergeneriertem Content im Web 2.0 bedarf einer Strukturierung, will man diese Inhalte sinnvoll nutzen können. Im Internet hat sich mit den Folksonomies eigenständig eine Methode zur inhaltlichen Erschließung von digitalen Ressourcen etabliert. Die Verschlagwortung durch freie, von den Nutzern erstellte Tags zeigt viel Potential, birgt aber auch einige Risiken. Der Beitrag soll grundlegend in die Funktionsweise von Folksonomies einführen und dabei auch Vor- und Nachteile dieser Methode der Wissensrepräsentation ansprechen. Außerdem soll anhand von Beispielen kurz gezeigt werden, wie Folksonomies sinnvoll von Bibliotheken eingesetzt werden können.
    Content
    Inhalt 1. Zur Notwendigkeit der Inhaltserschließung im Web 2.0 2. Funktion und Nutzen von Folksonomies 3. Folksonomies in Bibliotheken 4. Danksagung
  2. Sauperl, A.: UDC and Folksonomies (2010) 0.01
    0.009462625 = product of:
      0.014193937 = sum of:
        0.0052133505 = weight(_text_:e in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052133505 = score(doc=4069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
        0.008980587 = product of:
          0.017961174 = sum of:
            0.017961174 = weight(_text_:von in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017961174 = score(doc=4069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.14738473 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Teil von: Papers from Classification at a Crossroads: Multiple Directions to Usability: International UDC Seminar 2009-Part 2
    Language
    e
  3. Peters, I.: Benutzerzentrierte Erschließungsverfahren (2013) 0.01
    0.0084669795 = product of:
      0.025400937 = sum of:
        0.025400937 = product of:
          0.050801873 = sum of:
            0.050801873 = weight(_text_:von in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050801873 = score(doc=718,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.416867 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
  4. Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011) 0.01
    0.008295912 = product of:
      0.024887735 = sum of:
        0.024887735 = product of:
          0.04977547 = sum of:
            0.04977547 = weight(_text_:von in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04977547 = score(doc=343,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.40844458 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Folksonomies ermöglichen den Nutzern in Kollaborativen Informationsdiensten den Zugang zu verschiedenartigen Informationsressourcen. In welchen Fällen beide Bestandteile des Web 2.0 am besten für das Information Retrieval geeignet sind und wo sie die Websuche ggf. ersetzen können, wird in diesem Beitrag diskutiert. Dazu erfolgt eine detaillierte Betrachtung der Reichweite von Social-Bookmarking-Systemen und Sharing-Systemen sowie der Retrievaleffektivität von Folksonomies innerhalb von Kollaborativen Informationsdiensten.
  5. Peters, I.; Schumann, L.; Terliesner, J.: Folksonomy-basiertes Information Retrieval unter der Lupe (2012) 0.00
    0.004190941 = product of:
      0.012572822 = sum of:
        0.012572822 = product of:
          0.025145644 = sum of:
            0.025145644 = weight(_text_:von in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025145644 = score(doc=406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045677755 = queryNorm
                0.20633863 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Social Tagging ist eine weitverbreitete Methode, um nutzergenerierte Inhalte in Webdiensten zu indexieren. Dieser Artikel fasst die aktuelle Forschung zu Folksonomies und Effektivität von Tags in Retrievalsystemen zusammen. Es wurde ein TREC-ähnlicher Retrievaltest mit Tags und Ressourcen aus dem Social Bookmarking-Dienst delicious durchgeführt, welcher in Recall- und Precisionwerten für ausschließlich Tag-basierte Suchen resultierte. Außerdem wurden Tags in verschiedenen Stufen bereinigt und auf ihre Retrieval-Effektivität getestet. Testergebnisse zeigen, dass Retrieval in Folksonomies am besten mit kurzen Anfragen funktioniert. Hierbei sind die Recallwerte hoch, die Precisionwerte jedoch eher niedrig. Die Suchfunktion "power tags only" liefert verbesserte Precisionwerte.
  6. Chan, L.M.: Social bookmarking and subject indexing (2011) 0.00
    0.003475567 = product of:
      0.010426701 = sum of:
        0.010426701 = weight(_text_:e in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010426701 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    e
  7. Mai, J.-E.: Folksonomies and the new order : authority in the digital disorder (2011) 0.00
    0.0034406357 = product of:
      0.010321907 = sum of:
        0.010321907 = weight(_text_:e in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010321907 = score(doc=4553,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.15721233 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    e
  8. Johansson, S.; Golub, K.: LibraryThing for libraries : how tag moderation and size limitations affect tag clouds (2019) 0.00
    0.002457597 = product of:
      0.007372791 = sum of:
        0.007372791 = weight(_text_:e in 5398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007372791 = score(doc=5398,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 5398, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5398)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this study is to analyse differences between tags on LibraryThing's web page and tag clouds in their "Library-Thing for Libraries" service, and assess if, and how, the Library-Thing tag moderation and limitations to the size of the tag cloud in the library catalogue affect the description of the information resource. An e-mail survey was conducted with personnel at LibraryThing, and the results were compared against tags for twenty different fiction books, collected from two different library catalogues with disparate tag cloud sizes, and Library-Thing's web page. The data were analysed using a modified version of Golder and Huberman's tag categories (2006). The results show that while LibraryThing claims to only remove the inherently personal tags, several other types of tags are found to have been discarded as well. Occasionally a certain type of tag is in-cluded in one book, and excluded in another. The comparison between the two tag cloud sizes suggests that the larger tag clouds provide a more pronounced picture regarding the contents of the book but at the cost of an increase in the number of tags with synonymous or redundant information.
    Language
    e
  9. Spiteri, L.F.: Incorporating facets into social tagging applications : an analysis of current trends (2010) 0.00
    0.0024328968 = product of:
      0.0072986903 = sum of:
        0.0072986903 = weight(_text_:e in 3561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072986903 = score(doc=3561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 3561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3561)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    e
  10. Watters, C.; Nizam, N.: Knowledge organization on the Web : the emergent role of social classification (2012) 0.00
    0.0024328968 = product of:
      0.0072986903 = sum of:
        0.0072986903 = weight(_text_:e in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072986903 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    e
  11. Rafferty, P.: Tagging (2018) 0.00
    0.0024328968 = product of:
      0.0072986903 = sum of:
        0.0072986903 = weight(_text_:e in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072986903 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    e
  12. Bullard, J.: Curated Folksonomies : three implementations of structure through human judgment (2018) 0.00
    0.0024328968 = product of:
      0.0072986903 = sum of:
        0.0072986903 = weight(_text_:e in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072986903 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    e
  13. Peters, I.: Folksonomies, social tagging and information retrieval (2011) 0.00
    0.0020853402 = product of:
      0.00625602 = sum of:
        0.00625602 = weight(_text_:e in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00625602 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    e
  14. Lee, Y.Y.; Yang, S.Q.: Folksonomies as subject access : a survey of tagging in library online catalogs and discovery layers (2012) 0.00
    0.0020853402 = product of:
      0.00625602 = sum of:
        0.00625602 = weight(_text_:e in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00625602 = score(doc=309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    e
  15. Kim, H.H.: Toward video semantic search based on a structured folksonomy (2011) 0.00
    0.0017377835 = product of:
      0.0052133505 = sum of:
        0.0052133505 = weight(_text_:e in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052133505 = score(doc=4350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    e
  16. Park, H.: ¬A conceptual framework to study folksonomic interaction (2011) 0.00
    0.0017377835 = product of:
      0.0052133505 = sum of:
        0.0052133505 = weight(_text_:e in 4852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052133505 = score(doc=4852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4852)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    e
  17. Cope, J.: Librarianship as intellectual craft : the ethics of classification in the realms of leisure and waged labor (2012) 0.00
    0.0017377835 = product of:
      0.0052133505 = sum of:
        0.0052133505 = weight(_text_:e in 421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052133505 = score(doc=421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=421)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    e
  18. Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Power tags in information retrieval (2010) 0.00
    0.0017377835 = product of:
      0.0052133505 = sum of:
        0.0052133505 = weight(_text_:e in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052133505 = score(doc=865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    e
  19. Solskinnsbakk, G.; Gulla, J.A.; Haderlein, V.; Myrseth, P.; Cerrato, O.: Quality of hierarchies in ontologies and folksonomies (2012) 0.00
    0.0017377835 = product of:
      0.0052133505 = sum of:
        0.0052133505 = weight(_text_:e in 1034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052133505 = score(doc=1034,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1034, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1034)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    e
  20. Moreiro-González, J.-A.; Bolaños-Mejías, C.: Folksonomy indexing from the assignment of free tags to setup subject : a search analysis into the domain of legal history (2018) 0.00
    0.0017377835 = product of:
      0.0052133505 = sum of:
        0.0052133505 = weight(_text_:e in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052133505 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045677755 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    e