-
Ball, R.: Wissenschaftsindikatoren im Zeitalter digitaler Wissenschaft (2007)
0.06
0.057224747 = product of:
0.08583712 = sum of:
0.007372791 = weight(_text_:e in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007372791 = score(doc=875,freq=4.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
0.07846433 = sum of:
0.047520805 = weight(_text_:von in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047520805 = score(doc=875,freq=14.0), product of:
0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.3899434 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
0.030943526 = weight(_text_:22 in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030943526 = score(doc=875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Die Bereitstellung und Nutzung digitaler Bibliotheken entwickelt sich allmählich zum Standard der Literatur und Informationsversorgung in Wissenschaft und Forschung. Ganzen Disziplinen genügt oftmals die verfügbare digitale Information, Printmedien werden besonders im STM-Segment zu einem Nischenprodukt. Digitale Texte können beliebig eingebaut, kopiert und nachgenutzt werden, die Verlinkung zwischen Metadaten und Volltexten bringt weitere Nutzungsvorteile. Dabei sind die Angebote von Digital Libraries Bestandteil eines ganzheitlichen digitalen Ansatzes, wonach die elektronische Informations- und Literaturversorgung integraler Bestandteil von E-Science (Enhanced Science) oder Cyberinfrastructure darstellt. Hierbei verschmelzen dann Produktion, Diskussion, Distribution und Rezeption der wissenschaftlichen Inhalte auf einer einzigen digitalen Plattform. Damit sind dann nicht nur die Literatur- und Informationsversorgung (Digital Libraries), sondern auch die Wissenschaft selbst digital geworden. Diese dramatische Veränderung in der Wissenschaftskommunikation hat direkte Auswirkungen auf die Messung der Wissenschaftskommunikation, also auf die Evaluation von wissenschaftlichem Output. Bisherige Systeme der Wissenschaftsvermessung basieren hauptsächlich auf bibliometrischen Analysen, d.h. der Quantifizierung des Outputs und dessen Rezeption (Zitierhäufigkeit). Basis dafür sind insbesondere im STM-Bereich die international anerkannten Datenbanken des ISI (Thomson Scientific) insbesondere der Science Citation Index, SCI) oder vielleicht zukünftig das Konkurrenzprodukt SCOPUS des Wissenschaftskonzerns Reed Elsevier. Die Digitalisierung der Wissenschaft in ihrem kompletten Lebenszyklus, die zunehmende Nutzung und Akzeptanz von Dokumentenrepositorien, Institutsservern und anderen elektronischen Publikationsformen im Rahmen von E-Science erfordern und ermöglichen zugleich den Nachweis von Output und Rezeption durch neue bibliometrische Formen, etwa der Webometrie (Webmetrics). Im vorliegenden Paper haben wir hierzu Analysen durchgeführt und stellen eine Abschätzung vor, wie sich der Anteil von webometrisch erfassbarer und zugänglicher wissenschaftlicher Literatur im Vergleich zu Literatur, die mit den Standardsystemen nachgewiesen werden kann im Laufe der letzten Jahre verändert hat. Dabei haben wir unterschiedliche Disziplinen und Länder berücksichtigt. Zudem wird ein Vergleich der webometrischen Nachweisqualität so unterschiedlicher Systeme wie SCI, SCOPUS und Google Scholar vorgestellt.
- Date
- 23.12.2007 19:22:21
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.04
0.04412824 = product of:
0.06619236 = sum of:
0.016682722 = weight(_text_:e in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016682722 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.04950964 = product of:
0.09901928 = sum of:
0.09901928 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09901928 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.04
0.04412824 = product of:
0.06619236 = sum of:
0.016682722 = weight(_text_:e in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016682722 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.04950964 = product of:
0.09901928 = sum of:
0.09901928 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09901928 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Language
- e
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.04
0.04412824 = product of:
0.06619236 = sum of:
0.016682722 = weight(_text_:e in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016682722 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.04950964 = product of:
0.09901928 = sum of:
0.09901928 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09901928 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.04
0.04329444 = product of:
0.06494166 = sum of:
0.00625602 = weight(_text_:e in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00625602 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.058685638 = sum of:
0.021553408 = weight(_text_:von in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021553408 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.17686167 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.03713223 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03713223 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.04
0.038612213 = product of:
0.057918318 = sum of:
0.0145973805 = weight(_text_:e in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0145973805 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.043320935 = product of:
0.08664187 = sum of:
0.08664187 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08664187 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
- Language
- e
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.04
0.038612213 = product of:
0.057918318 = sum of:
0.0145973805 = weight(_text_:e in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0145973805 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.043320935 = product of:
0.08664187 = sum of:
0.08664187 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08664187 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
- Language
- e
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990)
0.04
0.038612213 = product of:
0.057918318 = sum of:
0.0145973805 = weight(_text_:e in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0145973805 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.043320935 = product of:
0.08664187 = sum of:
0.08664187 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08664187 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:55
- Language
- e
-
Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998)
0.04
0.036124967 = product of:
0.05418745 = sum of:
0.010426701 = weight(_text_:e in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010426701 = score(doc=3690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.04376075 = product of:
0.0875215 = sum of:
0.0875215 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0875215 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:22:35
- Language
- e
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.04
0.036124967 = product of:
0.05418745 = sum of:
0.010426701 = weight(_text_:e in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010426701 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.04376075 = product of:
0.0875215 = sum of:
0.0875215 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0875215 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
- Language
- e
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.03
0.03309618 = product of:
0.04964427 = sum of:
0.01251204 = weight(_text_:e in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01251204 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.03713223 = product of:
0.07426446 = sum of:
0.07426446 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07426446 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
- Language
- e
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.03
0.03309618 = product of:
0.04964427 = sum of:
0.01251204 = weight(_text_:e in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01251204 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.03713223 = product of:
0.07426446 = sum of:
0.07426446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07426446 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.03
0.03309504 = product of:
0.09928511 = sum of:
0.09928511 = sum of:
0.04977547 = weight(_text_:von in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04977547 = score(doc=77,freq=6.0), product of:
0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.40844458 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.04950964 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04950964 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Die Webometrie ist ein Teilbereich der Informationswissenschaft der zur Zeit auf die Analyse von Linkstrukturen konzentriert ist. Er ist stark von der Zitationsanalyse geprägt, wie der empirische Schwerpunkt auf der Wissenschaftsanalyse zeigt. In diesem Beitrag diskutieren wir die Nutzung linkbasierter Maße in einem breiten informetrischen Kontext und bewerten verschiedene Verfahren, auch im Hinblick auf ihr generelles Potentialfür die Sozialwissenschaften. Dabei wird auch ein allgemeiner Rahmenfür Linkanalysen mit den erforderlichen Arbeitsschritten vorgestellt. Abschließend werden vielversprechende zukünftige Anwendungsfelder der Webometrie benannt, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Analyse von Blogs.
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Schoepflin, U.; Glänzel, W.: Mehrwert von bibliographischen Datenbanken (1994)
0.03
0.028662112 = product of:
0.042993166 = sum of:
0.01251204 = weight(_text_:e in 6112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01251204 = score(doc=6112,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 6112, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6112)
0.030481124 = product of:
0.06096225 = sum of:
0.06096225 = weight(_text_:von in 6112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06096225 = score(doc=6112,freq=4.0), product of:
0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.5002404 = fieldWeight in 6112, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6112)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Mehrwert von Information - Professionalisierung der Informationsarbeit: Proceedings des 4. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'94), Graz, 2.-4. November 1994. Hrsg.: W. Rauch u.a
-
Ball, R.: Wissenschaftskommunikation im Wandel : die Verwendung von Fragezeichen im Titel von wissenschaftlichen Zeitschriftenbeiträgen in der Medizin, den Lebenswissenschaften und in der Physik von 1966 bis 2005 (2007)
0.03
0.02704217 = product of:
0.04056325 = sum of:
0.0072986903 = weight(_text_:e in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072986903 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
0.033264562 = product of:
0.066529125 = sum of:
0.066529125 = weight(_text_:von in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066529125 = score(doc=635,freq=14.0), product of:
0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.5459207 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Die Titel wissenschaftlicher Veröffentlichungen sind von besonderer Bedeutung. Wir haben fast 20 Millionen wissenschaftliche Artikel untersucht und den Anteil von Artikeln mit einem Fragezeichen am Ende des Titels im Laufe der letzten 40 Jahre analysiert. Unsere Studie beschränkte sich auf die Disziplinen Physik, Lebenswissenschaften und Medizin. Dabei haben wir eine deutliche Zunahme der Fragezeichen-Artikel von 50 Prozent auf mehr als 200 Prozent feststellten können. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden im vorliegenden Beitrag die grundsätzlichen Funktionen und Strukturen der Titel wissenschaftlicher Publikationen untersucht. Wir gehen davon aus, dass Marketing-Aspekte die entscheidenden Beweggründe sind für die zunehmende Nutzung von Fragezeichen-Titeln bei wissenschaftlichen Publikationen.
- Language
- e
-
Jovanovic, M.: ¬Eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie (2012)
0.03
0.026746348 = product of:
0.08023904 = sum of:
0.08023904 = sum of:
0.043106817 = weight(_text_:von in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043106817 = score(doc=326,freq=8.0), product of:
0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.35372335 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.03713223 = weight(_text_:22 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03713223 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In der Bibliometrie werden meist zwei Größen vermessen: die Anzahl von Publikationen und Zitationen. Publiziert und zitiert haben Menschen bereits sehr früh in der Geschichte. Schon in der Antike sind bei überlieferten Werken Zitationen zu finden. Der englische Begriff "Bibliometrics" selbst wurde aber erst 1969 definiert. In dem folgenden Artikel wird eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie, einer Unterdisziplin der Informationswissenschaft, bis zu diesem wichtigen Jahr anhand von beispielhaften Studien und Arbeiten dargestellt. Es wird auf die Anfänge von Publikationen und Zitationen und den fachlichen Rahmen der Bibliometrie eingegangen. Der Ursprung der Bibliometriegeschichte selbst wird von unterschiedlichen Autoren unterschiedlich früh angesetzt. Die verschiedenen Ansätze werden vorgestellt und diskutiert. Der Artikel schließt mit einer Beschreibung der wachsenden Bedeutung dieses Fachs im heutigen Informationszeitalter.
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:23:32
-
Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013)
0.03
0.026294082 = product of:
0.07888225 = sum of:
0.07888225 = sum of:
0.03556131 = weight(_text_:von in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03556131 = score(doc=900,freq=4.0), product of:
0.121865906 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.29180688 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.043320935 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043320935 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In diesem Beitrag wird eine Publikationsanalyse von Beiträgen in von im Web of Science (WoS) indexierten bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftlichen Zeitschriften vorgestellt. Die Ergebnisse dieser Analyse bestätigen die anglo-amerikanische Dominanz in der facheinschlägigen Literatur, die bei den primär informationswissenschaftlichen Zeitschriften sogar noch deutlicher ausfällt. Die skandinavischen Länder und der Bereich der Szientometrie stellen gewisse Ausnahmen dar. Die internationale Sichtbarkeit Deutschlands und Österreichs ist hingegen "ausbaufähig".
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 14:04:09
-
Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.03
0.026134988 = product of:
0.03920248 = sum of:
0.014447661 = weight(_text_:e in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014447661 = score(doc=4654,freq=6.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.22005144 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.02475482 = product of:
0.04950964 = sum of:
0.04950964 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04950964 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Classification
- AZC (E)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:50
- GHBS
- AZC (E)
- Language
- e
-
Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998)
0.02
0.024417307 = product of:
0.03662596 = sum of:
0.014745582 = weight(_text_:e in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014745582 = score(doc=2808,freq=16.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.22458905 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.021880375 = product of:
0.04376075 = sum of:
0.04376075 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04376075 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish
- Date
- 30. 1.1999 17:22:22
- Language
- e
-
Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998)
0.02
0.024367524 = product of:
0.036551286 = sum of:
0.011796465 = weight(_text_:e in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011796465 = score(doc=3691,freq=4.0), product of:
0.065655835 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.17967124 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
0.02475482 = product of:
0.04950964 = sum of:
0.04950964 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04950964 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15995571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045677755 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:26:54
- Language
- e
