Search (588 results, page 1 of 30)

0.08669405 = product of:
  0.1733881 = sum of:
    0.1733881 = product of:
      0.26008213 = sum of:
        0.18383119 = weight(_text_:d.h in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18383119 = score(doc=2255,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26960507 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.6818536 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
        0.076250955 = weight(_text_:l in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076250955 = score(doc=2255,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.4391412 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Information processing and management 31(1995) no.1, S.141-142 (D.H. Bent)

0.05417576 = product of:
  0.10835152 = sum of:
    0.10835152 = product of:
      0.16252728 = sum of:
        0.09150114 = weight(_text_:l in 17) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09150114 = score(doc=17,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 17, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=17)
        0.07102614 = weight(_text_:22 in 17) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07102614 = score(doc=17,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1529808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 17, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=17)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 14(1990) H.1, S.87-88 (L. Syré)

Series

Beiträge zum Buch- und Bibliothekswesen; 22

0.05417576 = product of:
  0.10835152 = sum of:
    0.10835152 = product of:
      0.16252728 = sum of:
        0.09150114 = weight(_text_:l in 3617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09150114 = score(doc=3617,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 3617, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3617)
        0.07102614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07102614 = score(doc=3617,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1529808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3617, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3617)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Isbn

3-925453-22-9

0.05417576 = product of:
  0.10835152 = sum of:
    0.10835152 = product of:
      0.16252728 = sum of:
        0.09150114 = weight(_text_:l in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09150114 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
        0.07102614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07102614 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1529808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

25.11.2005 18:37:22

Footnote

Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 23(1996) no.1, S.127-130 (L. Kuyper-Rushing)

0.05417576 = product of:
  0.10835152 = sum of:
    0.10835152 = product of:
      0.16252728 = sum of:
        0.09150114 = weight(_text_:l in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09150114 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
        0.07102614 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07102614 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1529808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)

0.045146473 = product of:
  0.090292946 = sum of:
    0.090292946 = product of:
      0.13543941 = sum of:
        0.076250955 = weight(_text_:l in 2345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076250955 = score(doc=2345,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.4391412 = fieldWeight in 2345, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2345)
        0.05918845 = weight(_text_:22 in 2345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05918845 = score(doc=2345,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1529808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2345, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2345)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

26. 7.2002 14:35:22

0.045146473 = product of:
  0.090292946 = sum of:
    0.090292946 = product of:
      0.13543941 = sum of:
        0.076250955 = weight(_text_:l in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076250955 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.4391412 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
        0.05918845 = weight(_text_:22 in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05918845 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1529808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Information processing and management 32(1996) no.3, S.394 (E. Cortez); Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.1, S.61-62 (M.A. Drake); Canadian journal of information and library science 20(1995) nos.3/4, S.57-58 (L. Copeland)

0.03676624 = product of:
  0.07353248 = sum of:
    0.07353248 = product of:
      0.22059742 = sum of:
        0.22059742 = weight(_text_:d.h in 4822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22059742 = score(doc=4822,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26960507 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.8182243 = fieldWeight in 4822, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4822)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.035433352 = product of:
  0.070866704 = sum of:
    0.070866704 = product of:
      0.106300056 = sum of:
        0.055149354 = weight(_text_:d.h in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055149354 = score(doc=921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26960507 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.20455608 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
        0.0511507 = weight(_text_:l in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0511507 = score(doc=921,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.2945849 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: INTRONA, L.D.: Context, power, bodies and information: exploring the 'entangled' contexts of information; JACOB, E.K. u.a.: When essence becomes function: post-structuralist implications for an ecological theory of organizational classification systems; MALMSJO, A.: Conditions for designing different kinds of information systems; JULIEN, H.: Where to from here? Results of an emprical study and user-centred implications for system design; VAKKARI, P.: Task complexity, information types, search strategies and relevance: integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval; SPINK, A.: Towards a theoretical framework for information retrieval in an information seeking context; KUHLTHAU, C.C.: Investigating patterns in information seeking; concepts in context; BREZILLON, P. u.a.: Modeling context in information seeking; BYSTROM, K.: Information seekers in context: an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies; AUDUNSON, R.: Can institutional theory contribute to our understanding of information seeking behaviour?; SONNENWALD, D.H.: Evolving perspectives of human information behaviour: conexts, situations, social networks and information horizons; OLSSON, M.: Discourse: a new theoretical framework for examining information behaviour in its social context; KEANE, D.: The information behaviour of senior executives; LIMBERG, L.: Three conceptions of information seeking and use; PRESTON, H. u.a.: An evaluation of case study methodology within information system research; WILSON, T.D.: Exploring models of information behaviour: the 'uncertainty' project; ENNIS, M. u.a.: Towards a predictive model of information seeking: empirical studies of end-user searching; SOLOMON, P.: Information mosaics: patterns of action that structure; TOMS, E.G.: What motivates the browser? ABAD-GARCIA, M.F.: Information needs of physicians at the University Clinic Hospital in Valencia-Spain: GORMAN, P.: Information seeking of primary care physicians: conceptual models and empirical studies; LOMAX, E.C. u.a.: An investigation of the information seeking behavior of medical oncologists in Metropolitan Pittsburgh using a multi-method approach; PETTIGREW, K.E.: Agents of information: the role of community health nurses in linking the elderly with local resources by providing human services information; URQUHART, C.J.: Using vignettes to diagnose information strategies: opportunities and possible problems for information use studies of health professionals; WILDEMUTH, B.M. u.a.: The transition from formalized need to compromised need in the context of clinical problem solving; MARCELLA, R. u. G. BAXTER: The transition from formalized need to compromised need in the context of clinical problem solving; COLES, C.: Information seeking behaviour of public library users: use and non-use of electronic media; GREEN, A.-M. u. E. DAVENPORT: Putting new media in its place: the Edinburgh experience; ROSS, C.S.: Finding without seeking: what readers say about the role of pleasure-reading as a source of information; SAVOLAINEN, R.: Seeking and using information from the Internet: the context of non-work use; SPINK, A. u.a.: Everyday life information-seeking by low-income African American households: Wynnewood Healthy Neighbourhood Project; DIXON, P. u. L. BANWELL: School governors and effective dicision making; COOPER, L. u. C.C. KUHLTHAU: Imagery for constructing meaning in the information search process: a study of middle school students; FABRITIUS, H.: Triangulation as a multiperspective strategy in a qualitative study of information seeking behaviour of journalists; JOHINSTON, S.: Training for the information economy: a study of the information culture of a graduate business school; NICHOLAS, D. u. P. WILLIAMS: The changing information environment: the impact of the Internet on information seeking behaviour in the media; WIJNGAERT, L. van de: A policy capturing study of media choice: the effect information of needs and user characteristics on media choices; FETZER, A.: Validity claims: assigning contextual information; FOSTER, A.: On the interpretative authority of information systems; MUTCH, A.: Information: a critical realist approach; PERRY, M.: Process, representation and taskworld: distributed cognition and the organisation of information; HUOTARI, M.-L.: Social network analysis as a tool to evaluate IM in the public sector: a pilot study at the University of Tampere

0.034378726 = product of:
  0.06875745 = sum of:
    0.06875745 = sum of:
      0.03676624 = weight(_text_:d.h in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03676624 = score(doc=3356,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26960507 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043685965 = queryNorm
          0.13637072 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
      0.015250191 = weight(_text_:l in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.015250191 = score(doc=3356,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043685965 = queryNorm
          0.08782824 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
      0.016741022 = weight(_text_:22 in 3356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.016741022 = score(doc=3356,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1529808 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.043685965 = queryNorm
          0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 3356, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3356)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Inhalt: Session 1 A: Theoretical Foundations of Knowledge Organization 1 Hanne Albrechtsen, Hans H K Andersen, Bryan Cleal and Annelise Mark Pejtersen: Categorical complexity in knowledge integration: empirical evaluation of a cross-cultural film research collaboratory; Clare Beghtol: Naive classification systems and the global information society; Terence R Smith and Marcia L Zeng: Concept maps supported by knowledge organization structures; B: Linguistic and Cultural Approaches to Knowledge Organization 1 Rebecca Green and Lydia Fraser: Patterns in verbal polysemy; Maria J López-Huertas, MarioBarite and Isabel de Torres: Terminological representation of specialized areas in conceptual structures: the case of gender studies; Fidelia Ibekwe-SanJuan and Eric SanJuan: Mining for knowledge chunks in a terminology network Session 2 A: Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Representation 1 Jin-Cheon Na, Haiyang Sui, Christopher Khoo, Syin Chan and Yunyun Zhou: Effectiveness of simple linguistic processing in automatic sentiment classification of product reviews; Daniel J O'Keefe: Cultural literacy in a global information society-specific language: an exploratory ontological analysis utilizing comparative taxonomy; Lynne C Howarth: Modelling a natural language gateway to metadata-enabled resources; B: Theoretical Foundations of Knowledge Organization 2: Facets & Their Significance Ceri Binding and Douglas Tudhope: Integrating faceted structure into the search process; Vanda Broughton and Heather Lane: The Bliss Bibliographic Classification in action: moving from a special to a universal faceted classification via a digital platform; Kathryn La Barre: Adventures in faceted classification: a brave new world or a world of confusion? Session 3 A: Theoretical Foundations of Knowledge Organization 3 Elin K Jacob: The structure of context: implications of structure for the creation of context in information systems; Uta Priss: A semiotic-conceptual framework for knowledge representation Giovanni M Sacco; Accessing multimedia infobases through dynamic taxonomies; Joseph T Tennis: URIS and intertextuality: incumbent philosophical commitments in the development of the semantic web; B: Social & Sociological Concepts in Knowledge Organization Grant Campbell: A queer eye for the faceted guy: how a universal classification principle can be applied to a distinct subculture; Jonathan Furner and Anthony W Dunbar: The treatment of topics relating to people of mixed race in bibliographic classification schemes: a critical ace-theoretic approach; H Peter Ohly: The organization of Internet links in a social science clearing house; Chern Li Liew: Cross-cultural design and usability of a digital library supporting access to Maori cultural heritage resources: an examination of knowledge organization issues; Session 4 A: Knowledge Organization of Universal and Special Systems 1: Dewey Decimal Classification Sudatta Chowdhury and G G Chowdhury: Using DDC to create a visual knowledge map as an aid to online information retrieval; Joan S Mitchell: DDC 22: Dewey in the world, the world in Dewey; Diane Vizine-Goetz and Julianne Beall: Using literary warrant to define a version of the DDCfor automated classification services; B: Applications in Knowledge Representation 2 Gerhard J A Riesthuis and Maja Zumer: FRBR and FRANAR: subject access; Victoria Frâncu: An interpretation of the FRBR model; Moshe Y Sachs and Richard P Smiraglia: From encyclopedism to domain-based ontology for knowledge management: the evolution of the Sachs Classification (SC); Session 5 A: Knowledge Organization of Universal and Special Systems 2 Ágnes Hajdu Barát: Knowledge organization of the Universal Decimal Classification: new solutions, user friendly methods from Hungary; Ia C McIlwaine: A question of place; Aida Slavic and Maria Inês Cordeiro: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications;

Footnote

Das Rahmenthema der Tagung kam aufgrund des vor und nach der ISKO-Konferenz abgehaltenen "UN World Summit an an Information Society" zustande. Im Titel des Buches ist die "globale Wissensgesellschaft" freilich eher irreführend, da keiner der darin abgedruckten Beiträge zentral davon handelt. Der eine der beiden Vorträge, die den Begriff selbst im Titel anführen, beschäftigt sich mit der Konstruktion einer Taxonomie für "cultural literacy" (O'Keefe), der andere mit sogenannten "naiven Klassifikationssystemen" (Beghtol), d.h. solchen, die im Gegensatz zu "professionellen" Systemen von Personen ohne spezifisches Interesse an klassifikatorischen Fragen entwickelt wurden. Beiträge mit "multi-kulti"-Charakter behandeln etwa Fragen wie - kulturübergreifende Arbeit, etwa beim EU-Filmarchiv-Projekt Collate (Albrechtsen et al.) oder einem Projekt zur Maori-Kultur (Liew); - Mehrsprachigkeit bzw. Übersetzung, z.B. der koreanischen Dezimalklassifikation (Kwasnik & Chun), eines auf der Sears ListofSubject Headings basierenden slowenischen Schlagwortvokabulars (Zalokar), einer spanisch-englischen Schlagwortliste für Gesundheitsfragen (Rosemblat et al.); - universelle Klassifikationssysteme wie die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (Joan Mitchell über die DDC 22, sowie zwei weitere Beiträge) und die Internationale Dezimalklassifikation (la McIlwaine über Geographika, Nancy Williamson über Alternativ- und Komplementärmedizin in der UDC). Unter den 55 Beiträgen finden sich folgende - aus der Sicht des Rezensenten - besonders interessante thematische "Cluster": - OPAC-orientierte Beiträge, etwa über die Anforderungen bei derAutomatisierung analytisch-synthetischer Klassifikationssysteme (Slavic & Cordeiro) sowie Beiträge zu Benutzerforschung und -verhalten (Lee & Clyde; Miller); - Erschliessung und Retrieval von visuellen bzw. multimedialen Ressourcen, insbesondere mit Ausrichtung auf Thesauri (Hudin; Garcia Jimenez & De Valle Gastaminza; Rafferty & Hidderley); - Thesaurus-Standards (Dextre Clark et al.), Thesauri und Endbenutzer (Shiri & Revie); - Automatisches Klassifizieren (Vizine-Goetz & Beall mit Bezug auf die DDC; Na et al. über methodische Ansätze bei der Klassifizierung von Produktbesprechungen nach positiven bzw. negativen Gefühlsäusserungen); - Beiträge über (hierzulande) weniger bekannte Systeme wie Facettenklassifikation einschliesslich der Bliss-Klassifikation sowie der Umsetzung der Ideen von Ranganathan durch E.J. Coates (vier Vorträge), die Sachs-Klassifikation (Sachs & Smiraglia) sowie M. S. van der Walts Schema zur Klassifizierung elektronischer Dokumente in Klein- und Mittelbetrieben. Auch die übrigen Beiträge sind mehrheitlich interessant geschrieben und zeugen vom fachlichen Qualitätsstandard der ISKO-Konferenzen. Der Band kann daher bibliothekarischen bzw. informationswissenschaftlichen Ausbildungseinrichtungen sowie Bibliotheken mit Sammelinteresse für Literatur zu Klassifikationsfragen ausdrücklich empfohlen werden. Ausserdem darf der nächsten (= neunten) internationalen ISKO-Konferenz, die 2006 in Wien abgehalten werden soll, mit Interesse entgegengesehen werden.

0.031529456 = product of:
  0.06305891 = sum of:
    0.06305891 = product of:
      0.09458837 = sum of:
        0.06499414 = weight(_text_:d.h in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06499414 = score(doc=302,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26960507 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.24107166 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
        0.029594226 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029594226 = score(doc=302,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1529808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Zum ersten Mal liegt die Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) auf Deutsch vor. Die Deutsche Bibliothek und die Fachhochschule Köln haben im Rahmen eines von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft finanzierten Projekts die 2003 erschienene Standard Edition der DDC 22 übersetzt und damit die Grundlage für die Nutzung der DDC im deutschsprachigen Raum geschaffen. In vier Bänden verzeichnet die DDC in etwa 60.000 Hauptklassen das gesamte Weltwissen in einer hierarchisch gegliederten Form, ergänzt durch umfangreiche Hilfstafeln für alle geografischen, ethnografischen und sprachlichen Einheiten und ein alphabetisches Register mit etwa 80.000 Einträgen.

Footnote

Rez. in: Informationsmittel für Bibliotheken (Online-Ausgabe) 06-2-176 (H. Wiesenmüller): "Die erste Version der Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) erschien 1876 - bis zur ersten deutschen Ausgabe hat es mithin fast 130 Jahre gedauert, obwohl die DDC schon in mehr als 30 Sprachen vorliegt. Dies zeigt deutlich, wie gering das Interesse an dieser Klassifikation im deutschsprachigen Raum noch bis vor kurzem gewesen ist. Kein Wunder, wurde doch der DDC - häufig sehr pauschal - eine rein amerikanische Weltsicht und ein antiquiertes Wissenschaftsbild unterstellt. Nichtsdestoweniger war der Einsatz einer deutschen DDC bereits 1998 von der Expertengruppe Klassifikation empfohlen worden. Eine Machbarkeitsstudie aus dem Jahr 2000 unterstützte diese Beurteilung und machte konkrete Vorgaben für die praktische Umsetzung. Zu den Vorteilen der DDC gehört ihre weltweite Verbreitung (wobei einschränkend zu sagen ist, daß die meisten 'academic libraries' in den USA nicht die DDC, sondern die Library of Congress Classification anwenden) sowie ihre kontinuierliche Pflege und dadurch verhältnismäßig hohe Aktualität, die sich freilich i.d.R. erst auf den tieferen Ebenen zeigt. In jüngerer Zeit hat sie außerdem große Bedeutung bei der sachlichen Erschließung von Online-Ressourcen gewonnen und wird von vielen Dokumentenservern und Fachportalen zumindest für ein grobes Klassifizieren eingesetzt. Die seit Oktober 2005 vorliegende deutsche Übersetzung der 22. Standard Edition von 2003 ist das Ergebnis eines an der Fachhochschule Köln und der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB) angesiedelten und von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) finanzierten Projekts (Laufzeit: 2002-2005). Das Projekt wurde von einer vom Standardisierungsausschuß eingesetzten Expertengruppe begleitet; über das Konsortium DDC Deutsch waren außerdem mehrere deutsche Bibliotheksverbünde sowie der Österreichische Bibliothekenverbund und die Schweizerische Landesbibliothek eingebunden.
Die hier anzuzeigende Druckausgabe wurde mit Hilfe eines speziell dafür entwickelten, datenbankgestützten Editionssystems erstellt. Parallel wurde ein Online-Dienst ('Melvil') aufgebaut, der im Vergleich zur Printversion mancherlei Vorteile besitzt. So wird Melvil halbjährlich aktualisiert und erweitert: Dabei werden nicht nur die amerikanischen Ergänzungslieferungen eingespielt, sondern auch synthetische, d.h. 'zusammengebaute' Notationen aus der praktischen Anwendung der DNB. Auch die Suchfunktionalitäten gehen deutlich über die Möglichkeiten der Druckausgabe hinaus - nicht zuletzt auf Grund einer sukzessiven Anreicherung mit Suchbegriffen aus der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) im Rahmen eines weiteren DFG-Projekts ('CrissCross'). So könnte man sich durchaus fragen, warum überhaupt eine Druckausgabe produziert wurde. Diese hat jedoch den unschätzbaren Vorteil, mit einer einmaligen Zahlung (wenn auch eines stattlichen Preises!) abgegolten zu sein, während für die Nutzung von Melvil jährliche Lizenzgebühren anfallen. Trotz ihres Umfangs von zusammen über 4000 Seiten sind die vier Bände vom Gewicht her erfreulich leicht ausgefallen. Das sehr dünne Papier hat allerdings den Nachteil, daß der Text der Rückseite deutlich durchschlägt. Als ausgesprochen gelungen empfand die Rezensentin die Umschlaggestaltung, bei der das klassische Dunkelgrün der DDC-Ausgaben mit dem bekannten (um nicht zu sagen: berüchtigten) Orange des Saur-Verlags kombiniert wurde. Der erste Band enthält - neben verschiedenen Vorworten und Begleittexten - eine kurz gefaßte Einführung in die DDC (im Original: Introduction to Dewey Decimal Classification; im Deutschen etwas unglücklich wiedergegeben als Einleitung in die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation), die Praxishilfe und die Hilfstafeln. In der Praxishilfe (im Original: Manual) werden schwierige Fälle erläutert, z.B. die Abgrenzung inhaltlich eng verwandter Klassen. Obwohl die Praxishilfe für die 22. Auflage komplett überarbeitet wurde, ist der Text noch immer recht schwer zu lesen. In der deutschen Fassung ergeben sich dabei z.T. komplizierte Schachtelsätze, die sich über fünf oder gar sechs Zeilen erstrecken.3 Die Haupttafeln finden sich im zweiten und dritten Band, das Register im abschließenden vierten Band.
Wer die deutsche DDC das erste Mal in die Hand nimmt, wird vielleicht überrascht sein vom hohen Grad der Übereinstimmung mit dem amerikanischen Vorbild. Dies zeigt sich nicht nur im identischen Aufbau, sondern auch im bis ins kleinste Detail kopierten Layout. Dazu muß man wissen, daß OCLC als Copyright-Inhaber für Übersetzungen der DDC äußerst strenge Vorgaben macht und deren Einhaltung genauestens kontrolliert. Das Projektteam arbeitete daher in einem sehr engen 'Korsett' und besaß nur wenig Spielraum für Anpassungen an deutsche Gepflogenheiten und das Setzen eigener Akzente. Die gewaltige Übersetzungsleistung, die im Laufe des Projekts erbracht wurde, zerfällt in zwei Bereiche: Zum einen mußten die Klassenbenennungen und Registerbegriffe übertragen werden, zum anderen die Erläuterungen und Anweisungen (sozusagen die 'Metatexte'). Beim ersten Teil der Aufgabe wurde das Team von ca. 70 Fachreferenten unterstützt, wobei man sich bemüht hat, jedes Fach doppelt zu besetzen. Durch dieses Verfahren ist eine ausgesprochen gute Qualität gewährleistet. Wieviel Arbeit in diesem Bereich geleistet wurde, läßt sich schon erahnen, wenn man nur die obersten 1000 Klassen der DDC (d.h. die ersten drei Ebenen) betrachtet: Diese wurden 2003 erstmals in deutscher Fassung herausgegeben. In der zweiten Auflage der kleinen Broschüre, die zum Ende des Übersetzungsprojekts erschien, waren in mehr als der Hälfte der Fälle die Klassenbenennungen geändert worden!

0.03063853 = product of:
  0.06127706 = sum of:
    0.06127706 = product of:
      0.18383119 = sum of:
        0.18383119 = weight(_text_:d.h in 6169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18383119 = score(doc=6169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26960507 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.6818536 = fieldWeight in 6169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6169)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.03050038 = product of:
  0.06100076 = sum of:
    0.06100076 = product of:
      0.18300228 = sum of:
        0.18300228 = weight(_text_:l in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18300228 = score(doc=2443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            1.0539389 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.030355891 = product of:
  0.060711782 = sum of:
    0.060711782 = product of:
      0.24284713 = sum of:
        0.24284713 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24284713 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3703701 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.029166631 = product of:
  0.058333263 = sum of:
    0.058333263 = product of:
      0.087499894 = sum of:
        0.055149354 = weight(_text_:d.h in 3085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055149354 = score(doc=3085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26960507 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.20455608 = fieldWeight in 3085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3085)
        0.03235054 = weight(_text_:l in 3085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03235054 = score(doc=3085,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.18631184 = fieldWeight in 3085, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3085)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Mit Beiträgen von: DEREMETZ, A.: Metaphor, organization and building of knowledge in textual sciences; ALBRECHTSEN, H. u. E.K. JACOB: The role of classificatory structures as boundary objects in information ecologies; MYLOPOULOS, J. et al.: Computational mechanisms for knowledge organization; PHELAN, A.: Database and knowledge representation: the Greek legacy; POLANCO, X. et al.: An artificial neural network perspective on knowledge representation from databases: the use of a multilayer preception for data clusters cartography; SUOMINEN, V.: Linguistic / semiotic conditions of retrieval / documentation in the light of a sausurean conception of language: 'organising knowledge' or 'communication concerning documents?'; BÉGUIN, A.: Thesaurus usage and mental development; SUKIASYAN, E.: Classification systems in their historical development: problems of typology and terminology; SALLET FERREIRA NOVELLINO, M.: Information transfer considering the production and use contexts: information retrieval languages; FISCHER, D.H.: From thesauri towards ontologies?; LYKKE NIELSEN, M.: Future thesauri: what kind of conceptual knowledge do searchers need?; LACROIX, S. et al.: OK: a model of ontologies by differentiation; LEE, M. u. R. MIZOGUCHI; Ontology models for supporting exploratory information needs;
OLSON, H.A. u. D.B. WARD: Charting a journey across knowledge domains: feminism in the Dewey Decimal Classification; RIESTHUIS, G.J.A.: Decomposition of UDC-numbers and the text of the UDC Master Reference File; MEO-EVOLI, L. u.a.: ICC and ICS: comparison and relations between two systems based on different principles; BARTOLO, L.M. et al.: The ALCOM/NIST heterogeneous structures database: knowledge structure for basic and applied research in an interdisciplinary scientific collaboration; BOWKER, L.: Peering through the linguistic keyhole: what can term choice tell us about knowledge organization?; ROUAULT, J.: About abuctive reasoning; GRUSELLE, J.-P.: A cognitive sciences system for symbol grounding; BEEBE, C. u. E.K. JACOB: Graphic language documents: structures and functions; METZGER, J.-P.: Information systems and professional activities; MUSTAFA EL-HADI, W.: Automatic term recognition & extraction tools: examining the new interfaces and their effective communication role in LSP discourse;

0.025857959 = product of:
  0.051715918 = sum of:
    0.051715918 = product of:
      0.15514775 = sum of:
        0.15514775 = weight(_text_:l in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15514775 = score(doc=1515,freq=92.0), product of:
            0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.8935202 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              9.591663 = tf(freq=92.0), with freq of:
                92.0 = termFreq=92.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Contains a reprinted Counterpoise interview with Sandy Berman plus 45 of his U*L columns dealing with such topics as book-burning, genocide, government secrecy and repression, cataloging, indexing, Banned Books Week, classism, self-censorship, and free speech for library staff

Content

Introduction (Counterpoise interview with Kristin Hoyer, 2005) -- Why catalog? (u*l 116, 2000) -- Must "the poor" always be among us? (u*l 117, 2000) -- The top censored library stories of 1998-2000 (u*l 118, 2001) -- Updates and additions (u*l 119, 2001) -- Updates and additions (u*l 120, 2001) -- No more shushing : library staff and users speak (part 1) (u*l 121, 2001) -- Harry Potter imperiled, keyword searching as panacea, Robin Hood's noble liege, and other foolishness (u*l 124, 2002) -- "Not in my library!" (u*l 125, 2002) -- Updates and additions (u*l 127, 2003) -- Cuba libre! (u*l 128, 2003) -- No more shushing : library staff and users speak (part 2), more on Cuba (u*l 129, 2003) -- King County responds, "Banned books week" deconstructed, cataloging blues at LAPL, Loompanics' Mike Hoy on censorship, deep-sixed Afghan atrocity film, Cuba again (u*l 130, 2004) -- Access denied (u*l 133, 2004) -- Squelched letters, more access denied (u*l 134, 2005) -- Fighting the USA Patriot Act, updates and additions (u*l 135, 2005) -- UCLA cross-refs, AACR3, library openness (u*l 136, 2005) -- Cataloging zines and widgets (u*l 137, 2005) -- Questions (u*l 138, 2006) -- "Genocide" or merely "massacres"? : the politics of subject cataloging (u*l 139, 2006) -- Darfur revisited, GLBT access denied (u*l 140, 2006) -- Subject cataloging (part 1) (u*l 143, 2007) -- Subject cataloging (part 2) (u*l 142, 2007) -- Subject cataloging (postscript), self-censorship (u*l 143, 2007) -- Obsessions (u*l 144, 2007) -- Huh?, fines and fees, self-censorship (continued) (u*l 145, 2007) -- "Controversial" cataloging (u*l 146, 2008) -- Flawed indexing, erotica selection, subject heading currency, undercataloging (u*l 147, 2008) -- Darfur redux, LC cataloging rescue, subject heading currency (u*l 148, 2008) -- Book, many missed opportunities, or why cataloging matters (when it's done right) (u*l 149, 2008) -- Cats, cataloging, fines, and BBW (Banned books week) (u*l 150, 2009) -- More classism in the stacks (u*l 151, 2009) -- Cataloging stink, truth in materials selection, CEO pay (u*l 152, 2009) -- Liberated foreword, unrequited LC letters (u*l 153, 2009) -- Nation gets it wrong, more unrequited LC letters, LCSH currency (u*l 154, 2010) -- More (attempted) LCSH input, geopolitics versus historical truth (u*l 155, 2010) -- LCSH currency (continued), libraries and politics, retiring the r-word, Celeste West tribute (u*l 156, 2010) -- The kids are not all right (u*l 157, 2010) -- Remembrance of things past, interview excerpts (u*l 158, 2011) -- More interview excerpts, atheist deficit, what Rosa said (u*l 159, 2011) -- No to government secrecy and repression! (u*l 160, 2011) -- Word peeves, "content-enriched metadata," no "sexting" allowed (u*l 161, 2011) -- Really banned books, another word peeve, Clint's fantasy, OWS library trashed, PFC Manning's gift (u*l 162, 2012) -- Post office crisis, LC letters (u*l 163, 2012) -- Another real banning, the trashing of both Hypatia and her library, not-so-funny cataloging (u*l 164, 2012) -- Laureates support PFC Manning, self-censorship affirmed, J'accuse LC of untimeliness and sloth, let's hear it for Robin Hood! (u*l 166, 2013).

0.025416985 = product of:
  0.05083397 = sum of:
    0.05083397 = product of:
      0.15250191 = sum of:
        0.15250191 = weight(_text_:l in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15250191 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.8782824 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.025416985 = product of:
  0.05083397 = sum of:
    0.05083397 = product of:
      0.15250191 = sum of:
        0.15250191 = weight(_text_:l in 3822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15250191 = score(doc=3822,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.8782824 = fieldWeight in 3822, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3822)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.025416985 = product of:
  0.05083397 = sum of:
    0.05083397 = product of:
      0.15250191 = sum of:
        0.15250191 = weight(_text_:l in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15250191 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.8782824 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.025416985 = product of:
  0.05083397 = sum of:
    0.05083397 = product of:
      0.15250191 = sum of:
        0.15250191 = weight(_text_:l in 5721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15250191 = score(doc=5721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17363653 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043685965 = queryNorm
            0.8782824 = fieldWeight in 5721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5721)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)