-
Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011)
0.03
0.02997284 = product of:
0.05994568 = sum of:
0.05994568 = sum of:
0.029520772 = weight(_text_:c in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029520772 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.03042491 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03042491 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
-
Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008)
0.01
0.010141637 = product of:
0.020283274 = sum of:
0.020283274 = product of:
0.04056655 = sum of:
0.04056655 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04056655 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.15-22
-
Hänger, C.: Good tags or bad tags? : Tagging im Kontext der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung (2008)
0.01
0.009840257 = product of:
0.019680513 = sum of:
0.019680513 = product of:
0.039361026 = sum of:
0.039361026 = weight(_text_:c in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039361026 = score(doc=2886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hotho, A.; Jäschke, R.; Benz, D.; Grahl, M.; Krause, B.; Schmitz, C.; Stumme, G.: Social Bookmarking am Beispiel BibSonomy (2009)
0.01
0.009840257 = product of:
0.019680513 = sum of:
0.019680513 = product of:
0.039361026 = sum of:
0.039361026 = weight(_text_:c in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039361026 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008)
0.01
0.008873932 = product of:
0.017747864 = sum of:
0.017747864 = product of:
0.03549573 = sum of:
0.03549573 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03549573 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 6.2009 12:22:44
-
Held, C.; Cress, U.: Social Tagging aus kognitionspsychologischer Sicht (2008)
0.01
0.008610224 = product of:
0.017220449 = sum of:
0.017220449 = product of:
0.034440897 = sum of:
0.034440897 = weight(_text_:c in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034440897 = score(doc=2885,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Web-2.0-Dienste als Ergänzung zu algorithmischen Suchmaschinen (2008)
0.01
0.007380193 = product of:
0.014760386 = sum of:
0.014760386 = product of:
0.029520772 = sum of:
0.029520772 = weight(_text_:c in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029520772 = score(doc=4323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Editor
- Lewandowski, D. u. C. Maaß
-
Niemann, C.: Intelligenz im Chaos : erste Schritte zur Analyse des Kreativen Potenzials eines Tagging-Systems (2010)
0.01
0.0061501605 = product of:
0.012300321 = sum of:
0.012300321 = product of:
0.024600642 = sum of:
0.024600642 = weight(_text_:c in 4375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024600642 = score(doc=4375,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4375, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4375)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hänger, C.; Krätzsch, C.; Niemann, C.: Was vom Tagging übrig blieb : Erkenntnisse und Einsichten aus zwei Jahren Projektarbeit (2011)
0.01
0.0053261956 = product of:
0.010652391 = sum of:
0.010652391 = product of:
0.021304782 = sum of:
0.021304782 = weight(_text_:c in 4519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021304782 = score(doc=4519,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.16502506 = fieldWeight in 4519, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4519)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Good tags - bad tags : Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation (2008)
0.00
0.0030750802 = product of:
0.0061501605 = sum of:
0.0061501605 = product of:
0.012300321 = sum of:
0.012300321 = weight(_text_:c in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012300321 = score(doc=3054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.09527725 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Enthält die Beiträge der Tagung "Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" am 21.-22.02.2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen. Volltext unter: http://www.waxmann.com/kat/inhalt/2039Volltext.pdf. Vgl. die Rez. unter: http://sehepunkte.de/2008/11/14934.html. Rez. in: IWP 60(1009) H.4, S.246-247 (C. Wolff): "Tagging-Systeme erfreuen sich in den letzten Jahren einer ungemein großen Beliebtheit, erlauben sie dem Nutzer doch die Informationserschließung "mit eigenen Worten", also ohne Rekurs auf vorgegebene Ordnungs- und Begriffsysteme und für Medien wie Bild und Video, für die herkömmliche Verfahren des Information Retrieval (noch) versagen. Die Beherrschung der Film- und Bilderfülle, wie wir sie bei Flickr oder YouTube vorfinden, ist mit anderen Mitteln als dem intellektuellen Einsatz der Nutzer nicht vorstellbar - eine professionelle Aufbereitung angesichts der Massendaten (und ihrer zu einem großen Teil auch minderen Qualität) nicht möglich und sinnvoll. Insofern hat sich Tagging als ein probates Mittel der Erschließung herausgebildet, das dort Lücken füllen kann, wo andere Verfahren (Erschließung durch information professionals, automatische Indexierung, Erschließung durch Autoren) fehlen oder nicht anwendbar sind. Unter dem Titel "Good Tags - Bad Tags. Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" und der Herausgeberschaft von Birgit Gaiser, Thorsten Hampel und Stefanie Panke sind in der Reihe Medien in der Wissenschaft (Bd. 47) Beiträge eines interdisziplinären Workshops der Gesellschaft für Medien in der Wissenschaft zum Thema Tagging versammelt, der im Frühjahr 2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien in Tübingen stattgefunden hat. . . .
