Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

0.008697641 = product of:
  0.017395282 = sum of:
    0.017395282 = product of:
      0.034790564 = sum of:
        0.034790564 = weight(_text_:c in 4354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034790564 = score(doc=4354,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 4354, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4354)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In the information age, a common problem for employees is not lack of resources but rather how to sift through multiple resources, both electronic and interpersonal, to retrieve and locate true expert knowledge. The main objective of this study is hence to explore employees' simultaneous usage of both resources and to identify situations where employees showed a clear preference of interpersonal resources over electronic ones, and where employees found these two resources (a) (ir)replaceable and (b) complementary. Both qualitative interview data and quantitative social-network data were collected from a university-affiliated community educational office. Data analysis showed that (a) social relationships were crucial for seeking and gaining actual access to needed knowledge; (b) employees were task-driven in knowledge seeking and obtained different types of knowledge depending on availability; and (c) the choice between interpersonal and electronic resources was determined by the characteristics of the knowledge sought as well as such contextual factors as time, cost, and location. Additional interviews from other study contexts validated most of our findings, except those that require collection of complete social-network data. The article ends with a discussion on how organizations can better leverage their investment in human and technical resources to facilitate knowledge seeking.

0.0076062274 = product of:
  0.015212455 = sum of:
    0.015212455 = product of:
      0.03042491 = sum of:
        0.03042491 = weight(_text_:22 in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03042491 = score(doc=1029,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

19.12.2015 11:57:22

0.0061501605 = product of:
  0.012300321 = sum of:
    0.012300321 = product of:
      0.024600642 = sum of:
        0.024600642 = weight(_text_:c in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024600642 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Im Jänner 2014 wurde das nationale dreijährige HRSM-Projekt e-Infrastructures Austria initiiert. Gesamtziel ist der koordinierte Aufbau und die Weiterentwicklung von Repositorieninfrastrukturen für Forschung und Lehre in ganz Österreich sowie ein effizientes und nachhaltiges Forschungsdatenmanagement an allen teilnehmenden 20 Universitäten und fünf weiteren außeruniversitären Forschungseinrichtungen. Das Projekt gliedert sich in drei Teilprojekte, die thematisch ineinander übergreifen und/oder aufeinander aufbauen. Die Koordination erfolgt durch die Universität Wien. Bis Ende 2016 sollen drei Ziele realisiert werden: - Teilprojekt A (Ziel 1): Aufbau von Dokumentenservern auf lokaler Ebene an den Partneruniversitäten. Zweck: Aufstellung von institutionellen Repositorien an allen teilnehmenden Einrichtungen (alle österreichischen Universitäten mit Ausnahme der Medizinischen Universität Innsbruck) - Teilprojekt B (Ziel 2): Erarbeitung eines strategischen Konzepts für das zukünftige Forschungsdatenmanagement in Österreich - Teilprojekt C (Ziel 3): Aufbau einer Wissensinfrastruktur ("knowledge infrastructure") für alle 25 Projektpartner.