-
HaCohen-Kerner, Y. et al.: Classification using various machine learning methods and combinations of key-phrases and visual features (2016)
0.01
0.0126770465 = product of:
0.025354093 = sum of:
0.025354093 = product of:
0.050708186 = sum of:
0.050708186 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050708186 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Fagni, T.; Sebastiani, F.: Selecting negative examples for hierarchical text classification: An experimental comparison (2010)
0.01
0.010652391 = product of:
0.021304782 = sum of:
0.021304782 = product of:
0.042609565 = sum of:
0.042609565 = weight(_text_:c in 4101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042609565 = score(doc=4101,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.3300501 = fieldWeight in 4101, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Hierarchical text classification (HTC) approaches have recently attracted a lot of interest on the part of researchers in human language technology and machine learning, since they have been shown to bring about equal, if not better, classification accuracy with respect to their "flat" counterparts while allowing exponential time savings at both learning and classification time. A typical component of HTC methods is a "local" policy for selecting negative examples: Given a category c, its negative training examples are by default identified with the training examples that are negative for c and positive for the categories which are siblings of c in the hierarchy. However, this policy has always been taken for granted and never been subjected to careful scrutiny since first proposed 15 years ago. This article proposes a thorough experimental comparison between this policy and three other policies for the selection of negative examples in HTC contexts, one of which (BEST LOCAL (k)) is being proposed for the first time in this article. We compare these policies on the hierarchical versions of three supervised learning algorithms (boosting, support vector machines, and naïve Bayes) by performing experiments on two standard TC datasets, REUTERS-21578 and RCV1-V2.
-
Qu, B.; Cong, G.; Li, C.; Sun, A.; Chen, H.: ¬An evaluation of classification models for question topic categorization (2012)
0.01
0.008697641 = product of:
0.017395282 = sum of:
0.017395282 = product of:
0.034790564 = sum of:
0.034790564 = weight(_text_:c in 237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034790564 = score(doc=237,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 237, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=237)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We study the problem of question topic classification using a very large real-world Community Question Answering (CQA) dataset from Yahoo! Answers. The dataset comprises 3.9 million questions and these questions are organized into more than 1,000 categories in a hierarchy. To the best knowledge, this is the first systematic evaluation of the performance of different classification methods on question topic classification as well as short texts. Specifically, we empirically evaluate the following in classifying questions into CQA categories: (a) the usefulness of n-gram features and bag-of-word features; (b) the performance of three standard classification algorithms (naive Bayes, maximum entropy, and support vector machines); (c) the performance of the state-of-the-art hierarchical classification algorithms; (d) the effect of training data size on performance; and (e) the effectiveness of the different components of CQA data, including subject, content, asker, and the best answer. The experimental results show what aspects are important for question topic classification in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency. We believe that the experimental findings from this study will be useful in real-world classification problems.
-
Zhu, W.Z.; Allen, R.B.: Document clustering using the LSI subspace signature model (2013)
0.01
0.0076062274 = product of:
0.015212455 = sum of:
0.015212455 = product of:
0.03042491 = sum of:
0.03042491 = weight(_text_:22 in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03042491 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 23. 3.2013 13:22:36
-
Egbert, J.; Biber, D.; Davies, M.: Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification (2015)
0.01
0.0076062274 = product of:
0.015212455 = sum of:
0.015212455 = product of:
0.03042491 = sum of:
0.03042491 = weight(_text_:22 in 2158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03042491 = score(doc=2158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 8.2015 19:22:04
-
Sojka, P.; Lee, M.; Rehurek, R.; Hatlapatka, R.; Kucbel, M.; Bouche, T.; Goutorbe, C.; Anghelache, R.; Wojciechowski, K.: Toolset for entity and semantic associations : Final Release (2013)
0.01
0.007380193 = product of:
0.014760386 = sum of:
0.014760386 = product of:
0.029520772 = sum of:
0.029520772 = weight(_text_:c in 1057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029520772 = score(doc=1057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1057)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Liu, R.-L.: ¬A passage extractor for classification of disease aspect information (2013)
0.01
0.0063385232 = product of:
0.0126770465 = sum of:
0.0126770465 = product of:
0.025354093 = sum of:
0.025354093 = weight(_text_:22 in 1107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025354093 = score(doc=1107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28.10.2013 19:22:57
-
Wartena, C.; Sommer, M.: Automatic classification of scientific records using the German Subject Heading Authority File (SWD) (2012)
0.01
0.0061501605 = product of:
0.012300321 = sum of:
0.012300321 = product of:
0.024600642 = sum of:
0.024600642 = weight(_text_:c in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024600642 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Vilares, D.; Alonso, M.A.; Gómez-Rodríguez, C.: On the usefulness of lexical and syntactic processing in polarity classification of Twitter messages (2015)
0.01
0.0061501605 = product of:
0.012300321 = sum of:
0.012300321 = product of:
0.024600642 = sum of:
0.024600642 = weight(_text_:c in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024600642 = score(doc=2161,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Chae, G.; Park, J.; Park, J.; Yeo, W.S.; Shi, C.: Linking and clustering artworks using social tags : revitalizing crowd-sourced information on cultural collections (2016)
0.01
0.0061501605 = product of:
0.012300321 = sum of:
0.012300321 = product of:
0.024600642 = sum of:
0.024600642 = weight(_text_:c in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024600642 = score(doc=2852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ru, C.; Tang, J.; Li, S.; Xie, S.; Wang, T.: Using semantic similarity to reduce wrong labels in distant supervision for relation extraction (2018)
0.01
0.0061501605 = product of:
0.012300321 = sum of:
0.012300321 = product of:
0.024600642 = sum of:
0.024600642 = weight(_text_:c in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024600642 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.037426826 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
