Search (92 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.07
    0.07303337 = product of:
      0.10955005 = sum of:
        0.07904324 = weight(_text_:f in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07904324 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
        0.030506812 = product of:
          0.061013624 = sum of:
            0.061013624 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061013624 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15769821 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503309 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
    Source
    Productivity in the information age : proceedings of the 46th ASIS annual meeting, 1983. Ed.: Raymond F Vondra
  2. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.06
    0.058426693 = product of:
      0.08764004 = sum of:
        0.06323459 = weight(_text_:f in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06323459 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
        0.02440545 = product of:
          0.0488109 = sum of:
            0.0488109 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0488109 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15769821 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503309 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Language
    f
  3. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Sobczyk, G.; Duffin, R.: Information skills, searching behaviour and cognitive styles for student-centred learning : a computer-assisted learning approach (1996) 0.04
    0.04382002 = product of:
      0.06573003 = sum of:
        0.04742594 = weight(_text_:f in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04742594 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
        0.018304085 = product of:
          0.03660817 = sum of:
            0.03660817 = weight(_text_:22 in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03660817 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15769821 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503309 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.2, S.79-92
  4. Crestani, F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Information retrieval by imaging (1996) 0.04
    0.04382002 = product of:
      0.06573003 = sum of:
        0.04742594 = weight(_text_:f in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04742594 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
        0.018304085 = product of:
          0.03660817 = sum of:
            0.03660817 = weight(_text_:22 in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03660817 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15769821 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503309 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  5. Kaltenborn, K.-F.: Endnutzerrecherchen in der CD-ROM-Datenbank Medline : T.1: Evaluations- und Benutzerforschung über Nutzungscharakteristika, Bewertung der Rechercheergebnisse und künftige Informationsgewinnung; T.2: Evaluations- und Benutzerforschung über Recherchequalität und Nutzer-Computer/Datenbank-Interaktion (1991) 0.04
    0.041634273 = product of:
      0.062451407 = sum of:
        0.04742594 = weight(_text_:f in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04742594 = score(doc=5105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
        0.015025468 = product of:
          0.030050935 = sum of:
            0.030050935 = weight(_text_:von in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030050935 = score(doc=5105,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12014598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503309 = queryNorm
                0.2501202 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die Einführung von CD-ROM Datenbanken als neue Informationstechnologie hat die Formen der Informationsgewinnung in bestimmten wissenschaftlichen Fachgebieten grundlegend geändert. Der Beitrag berichtet über Ergebnisse wissenschaftlicher Begleitforschung bei Endnutzerrecherchen in der CD-ROM-Version der Datenbank MEDLINE. Hierzu wurden drei verschiedene Erhebungen durchgeführt. Hiernach ist die überwiegende Zahl der Endnutzer (89,3%) mit dem jeweiligen Rechercheresultat zufrieden, wobei Benutzer mit geringer Rechercheerfahrung eine höhere Zufriedenheitsrate erreichen als Benutzer mit umfangreicheren Recherchekenntnissen. Die Gründe zur Nutzung von CD-ROM-Systemen resultieren voriwegend aus der klinischen Alltagsroutine oder täglichen Forschungspraxis, während vermittelte Online-Literatursuchen tendenziell häufiger im Zusammenhang mit einmaligen Ereignissen der wissenschaftlichen Aus- und Weiterbildung stehen. Die selbständige CD-ROM Literaturrecherche stellt für die befragten Ärzte und Wissenschaftler die bevorzugte Methode der Informationsgewinnung dar. Die analysierten Endnutzerrecherchen weisen allerdings Fehler und Defizite hinsichtlich einer optimalen Suchstrategie auf, die zu unbemerktn Informationsverlusten und zu Fehlbeurteilungen des wissenschaftlichen Kenntnisstandes führen
  6. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.04
    0.035158496 = product of:
      0.105475485 = sum of:
        0.105475485 = sum of:
          0.056664582 = weight(_text_:von in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056664582 = score(doc=261,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.12014598 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04503309 = queryNorm
              0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.0488109 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0488109 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15769821 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04503309 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  7. Reichert, S.; Mayr, P.: Untersuchung von Relevanzeigenschaften in einem kontrollierten Eyetracking-Experiment (2012) 0.03
    0.02636887 = product of:
      0.07910661 = sum of:
        0.07910661 = sum of:
          0.042498436 = weight(_text_:von in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042498436 = score(doc=328,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.12014598 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04503309 = queryNorm
              0.35372335 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
          0.03660817 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03660817 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15769821 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04503309 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Artikel wird ein Eyetracking-Experiment beschrieben, bei dem untersucht wurde, wann und auf Basis welcher Informationen Relevanzentscheidungen bei der themenbezogenen Dokumentenbewertung fallen und welche Faktoren auf die Relevanzentscheidung einwirken. Nach einer kurzen Einführung werden relevante Studien aufgeführt, in denen Eyetracking als Untersuchungsmethode für Interaktionsverhalten mit Ergebnislisten (Information Seeking Behavior) verwendet wurde. Nutzerverhalten wird hierbei vor allem durch unterschiedliche Aufgaben-Typen, dargestellte Informationen und durch das Ranking eines Ergebnisses beeinflusst. Durch EyetrackingUntersuchungen lassen sich Nutzer außerdem in verschiedene Klassen von Bewertungs- und Lesetypen einordnen. Diese Informationen können als implizites Feedback genutzt werden, um so die Suche zu personalisieren und um die Relevanz von Suchergebnissen ohne aktives Zutun des Users zu erhöhen. In einem explorativen Eyetracking-Experiment mit 12 Studenten der Hochschule Darmstadt werden anhand der Länge der Gesamtbewertung, Anzahl der Fixationen, Anzahl der besuchten Metadatenelemente und Länge des Scanpfades zwei typische Bewertungstypen identifiziert. Das Metadatenfeld Abstract wird im Experiment zuverlässig als wichtigste Dokumenteigenschaft für die Zuordnung von Relevanz ermittelt.
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:25:54
  8. Crestani, F.; Ruthven, I.; Sanderson, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The troubles with using a logical model of IR on a large collection of documents : experimenting retrieval by logical imaging on TREC (1996) 0.03
    0.026347747 = product of:
      0.07904324 = sum of:
        0.07904324 = weight(_text_:f in 7522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07904324 = score(doc=7522,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 7522, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7522)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  9. Strzalkowski, T.; Guthrie, L.; Karlgren, J.; Leistensnider, J.; Lin, F.; Perez-Carballo, J.; Straszheim, T.; Wang, J.; Wilding, J.: Natural language information retrieval : TREC-5 report (1997) 0.03
    0.026347747 = product of:
      0.07904324 = sum of:
        0.07904324 = weight(_text_:f in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07904324 = score(doc=3100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  10. López-Ostenero, F.; Peinado, V.; Gonzalo, J.; Verdejo, F.: Interactive question answering : Is Cross-Language harder than monolingual searching? (2008) 0.02
    0.0223568 = product of:
      0.0670704 = sum of:
        0.0670704 = weight(_text_:f in 2023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0670704 = score(doc=2023,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.37366742 = fieldWeight in 2023, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2023)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  11. Buckland, M.; Gey, F.: ¬The relationship between recall and precision (1994) 0.02
    0.021078197 = product of:
      0.06323459 = sum of:
        0.06323459 = weight(_text_:f in 7204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06323459 = score(doc=7204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 7204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7204)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  12. Jochum, F.; Weissmann, V.: Struktur und Elemente des Information Retrieval Experiments (1985) 0.02
    0.021078197 = product of:
      0.06323459 = sum of:
        0.06323459 = weight(_text_:f in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06323459 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  13. Chevallet, J.-P.; Bruandet, M.F.: Impact de l'utilisation de multi terms sur la qualité des résponses dùn système de recherche d'information a indexation automatique (1999) 0.02
    0.021078197 = product of:
      0.06323459 = sum of:
        0.06323459 = weight(_text_:f in 6253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06323459 = score(doc=6253,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 6253, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6253)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Language
    f
  14. Debole, F.; Sebastiani, F.: ¬An analysis of the relative hardness of Reuters-21578 subsets (2005) 0.02
    0.01863067 = product of:
      0.05589201 = sum of:
        0.05589201 = weight(_text_:f in 3456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05589201 = score(doc=3456,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 3456, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3456)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  15. Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Thresholding the postings lists in information retrieval : experiments on TREC data (1995) 0.02
    0.018443422 = product of:
      0.055330265 = sum of:
        0.055330265 = weight(_text_:f in 5804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055330265 = score(doc=5804,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 5804, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5804)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  16. Tombros, T.; Crestani, F.: Users' perception of relevance of spoken documents (2000) 0.02
    0.018443422 = product of:
      0.055330265 = sum of:
        0.055330265 = weight(_text_:f in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055330265 = score(doc=4996,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  17. Kilgour, F.: ¬An experiment using coordinate title word searches (2004) 0.02
    0.018443422 = product of:
      0.055330265 = sum of:
        0.055330265 = weight(_text_:f in 2065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055330265 = score(doc=2065,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 2065, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2065)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  18. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Walsh, C.: ¬The effect of postings information on search behaviour (1994) 0.02
    0.015808647 = product of:
      0.04742594 = sum of:
        0.04742594 = weight(_text_:f in 6890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04742594 = score(doc=6890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 6890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6890)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  19. Ribeiro, F.: Subject indexing and authority control in archives : the need for subject indexing in archives and for an indexing policy using controlled language (1996) 0.02
    0.015808647 = product of:
      0.04742594 = sum of:
        0.04742594 = weight(_text_:f in 6577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04742594 = score(doc=6577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 6577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6577)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  20. ¬The Second Text Retrieval Conference : TREC-2 (1995) 0.02
    0.015808647 = product of:
      0.04742594 = sum of:
        0.04742594 = weight(_text_:f in 1320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04742594 = score(doc=1320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 1320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1320)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: HARMAN, D.: Overview of the Second Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-2); SPRACK JONES, K.: Reflections on TREC; BUCKLEY, C., J. ALLAN u. G. SALTON: Automatic routing and retrieval using SMART: TREC-2; CALLAN, J.P., W.B. CROFT u. J. BROGLIO: TREC and TIPSTER experiments with INQUERY; ROBERTSON, S.R., S. WALKER u. M.M. HANCOCK-BEAULIEU: Large test collection experiments on an operational, interactive system: OKAPI at TREC; ZOBEL, J., A. MOFFAT, R. WILKINSON u. R. SACKS-DAVIS: Efficient retrieval of partial documents; METTLER, M. u. F. NORDBY: TREC routing experiments with the TRW/Paracel Fast Data Finder; EVANS, D.A. u. R.G. LEFFERTS: CLARIT-TREC experiments; STRZALKOWSKI, T.: Natural language information retrieval; CAID, W.R., S.T. DUMAIS u. S.I. GALLANT: Learned vector-space models for document retrieval; BELKIN, N.J. P. KANTOR, E.A. FOX u. J.A. SHAW: Combining the evidence of multiple query representations for information retrieval

Languages

  • e 48
  • d 40
  • f 2
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 77
  • el 6
  • m 4
  • r 4
  • s 4
  • x 4
  • More… Less…