Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.08 
    0.08188704 = product of:
  0.122830555 = sum of:
    0.055330265 = weight(_text_:f in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055330265 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04503309 = queryNorm
        0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
    0.06750029 = sum of:
      0.024790756 = weight(_text_:von in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024790756 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12014598 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04503309 = queryNorm
          0.20633863 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.042709537 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042709537 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15769821 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04503309 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  2. Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998) 0.05 
    0.05112336 = product of:
  0.076685034 = sum of:
    0.055330265 = weight(_text_:f in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055330265 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04503309 = queryNorm
        0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
    0.021354768 = product of:
      0.042709537 = sum of:
        0.042709537 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042709537 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15769821 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Language
    f
  3. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008) 0.05 
    0.04515043 = product of:
  0.06772564 = sum of:
    0.055330265 = weight(_text_:f in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055330265 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04503309 = queryNorm
        0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
    0.012395378 = product of:
      0.024790756 = sum of:
        0.024790756 = weight(_text_:von in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024790756 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12014598 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.20633863 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. Am Beispiel des Gegenstandsbereichs "Theater" der Schlagwortnormdatei wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, welche eine detaillierte und damit funktionale Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Die Relationierung des Gegenstandsbereichs wird als Ontologie im OWL-Format modelliert. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines vorgegebenen Gegenstandsbereichs heraus. Das entwickelte Inventar wird als eine hierarchisch strukturierte Taxonomie gestaltet, was einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität bringt.
  4. Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997) 0.04 
    0.04382002 = product of:
  0.06573003 = sum of:
    0.04742594 = weight(_text_:f in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04742594 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04503309 = queryNorm
        0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
    0.018304085 = product of:
      0.03660817 = sum of:
        0.03660817 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03660817 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15769821 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Language
    f
  5. Maille, B.: ¬Les relations sémantiques des thésaurus (1991) 0.04 
    0.042156395 = product of:
  0.12646918 = sum of:
    0.12646918 = weight(_text_:f in 5525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12646918 = score(doc=5525,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04503309 = queryNorm
        0.7045941 = fieldWeight in 5525, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5525)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Language
    f
  6. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008) 0.04 
    0.03870037 = product of:
  0.05805055 = sum of:
    0.04742594 = weight(_text_:f in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04742594 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04503309 = queryNorm
        0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
    0.010624609 = product of:
      0.021249218 = sum of:
        0.021249218 = weight(_text_:von in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021249218 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12014598 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.17686167 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. Am Beispiel des Gegenstandsbereichs "Theater" der Schlagwortnormdatei wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, welche eine detaillierte und damit funktionale Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Die Relationierung des Gegenstandsbereichs wird als Ontologie im OWL-Format modelliert. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines vorgegebenen Gegenstandsbereichs heraus. Das entwickelte Inventar wird als eine hierarchisch strukturierte Taxonomie gestaltet, was einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität bringt.
  7. Maniez, J.: Actualité des langages documentaires : fondements théoriques de la recherche d'information (2002) 0.03 
    0.031617295 = product of:
  0.09485188 = sum of:
    0.09485188 = weight(_text_:f in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09485188 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04503309 = queryNorm
        0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Language
    f
  8. Courrier, Y.: SYNTOL (2009) 0.02 
    0.018443422 = product of:
  0.055330265 = sum of:
    0.055330265 = weight(_text_:f in 3887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055330265 = score(doc=3887,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04503309 = queryNorm
        0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 3887, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3887)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Location
    F
  9. Mazzocchi, F.; Plini, P.: Refining thesaurus relational structure : implications and opportunities (2008) 0.02 
    0.015808647 = product of:
  0.04742594 = sum of:
    0.04742594 = weight(_text_:f in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04742594 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04503309 = queryNorm
        0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  10. Principles underlying subject heading languages (SHLs) (1999) 0.02 
    0.015808647 = product of:
  0.04742594 = sum of:
    0.04742594 = weight(_text_:f in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04742594 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04503309 = queryNorm
        0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Location
    F
  11. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.01 
    0.014236513 = product of:
  0.042709537 = sum of:
    0.042709537 = product of:
      0.08541907 = sum of:
        0.08541907 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08541907 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15769821 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  12. Mazzocchi, F.; Tiberi, M.; De Santis, B.; Plini, P.: Relational semantics in thesauri : an overview and some remarks at theoretical and practical levels (2007) 0.01 
    0.013173874 = product of:
  0.03952162 = sum of:
    0.03952162 = weight(_text_:f in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03952162 = score(doc=1462,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04503309 = queryNorm
        0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1462)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  13. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.01 
    0.011504839 = product of:
  0.034514517 = sum of:
    0.034514517 = product of:
      0.06902903 = sum of:
        0.06902903 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06902903 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15769821 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  14. Neet, H.: Assoziationsrelationen in Dokumentationslexika für die verbale Sacherschließung (1984) 0.01 
    0.010558821 = product of:
  0.031676464 = sum of:
    0.031676464 = product of:
      0.06335293 = sum of:
        0.06335293 = weight(_text_:von in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06335293 = score(doc=1254,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12014598 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.52729964 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Thesauri und Dokumentationslexika können als Varianten von onomasiologischen Wörterbüchern aufgefaßt werden, deren besonderes Interesse für die Linguistik darin besteht, daß Äquivalenz-, Hierarchie- und Assoziationsrelationen angegegeben werden. Regelwerke und Beiträge werden besprochen, die sich mit der Ausweisung von "verwandten" Begriffen in der bibliothekarischen und dokumentarischen Praxis befassen. Belege zu Musterbeispielen von "siehe auch"- und "related term"-Verweisungen werden anhand von drei deutschsprachigen Schlagwortregistern aufgelistet. Die Assoziationsrelationen werden in paradigmatische und syntagmatische Beziehungen eingeteilt. Auch Gruppierungen nach Begriffsfeldern und Assoziationsfeldern sind möglich. Untersuchungen von Assoziationsrelationen im Sachbereich "Buchwesen" bestätigen die Vermutung, daß die Mehrzahl der Verweisungen das gemeinsame Vorkommen bestimmter Begriffe in typischen Kontexten der außersprachlichen Wirklichkeit betrifft.
  15. Mazzocchi, F.: Relations in KOS : is it possible to couple a common nature with different roles? (2017) 0.01 
    0.010539099 = product of:
  0.031617295 = sum of:
    0.031617295 = weight(_text_:f in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031617295 = score(doc=78,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04503309 = queryNorm
        0.17614852 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  16. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.01 
    0.010168938 = product of:
  0.030506812 = sum of:
    0.030506812 = product of:
      0.061013624 = sum of:
        0.061013624 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061013624 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15769821 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Pages
    S.11-22
  17. Krömmelbein, U.: Natürliche Sprache und Strukturprinzipien von Dokumentationssprachen : eine vergleichende Analyse (1981) 0.01 
    0.009444097 = product of:
  0.028332291 = sum of:
    0.028332291 = product of:
      0.056664582 = sum of:
        0.056664582 = weight(_text_:von in 1372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056664582 = score(doc=1372,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12014598 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 1372, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1372)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  18. Fugmann, R.: ¬Die Grenzen des Thesaurus-Verfahrens bei der Wiedergabe von Begriffsrelationen (1975) 0.01 
    0.009444097 = product of:
  0.028332291 = sum of:
    0.028332291 = product of:
      0.056664582 = sum of:
        0.056664582 = weight(_text_:von in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056664582 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12014598 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  19. Dahlberg, I.: Über Gegenstände, Begriffe, Definitionen und Benennungen: zur möglichen Neufassung von DIN 2330 (1976) 0.01 
    0.009444097 = product of:
  0.028332291 = sum of:
    0.028332291 = product of:
      0.056664582 = sum of:
        0.056664582 = weight(_text_:von in 1390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056664582 = score(doc=1390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12014598 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04503309 = queryNorm
            0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 1390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1390)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  20. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.01 
    0.009221711 = product of:
  0.027665133 = sum of:
    0.027665133 = weight(_text_:f in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027665133 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17949225 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04503309 = queryNorm
        0.15412995 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 16
  • e 14
  • f 4

Types

  • a 23
  • r 4
  • m 3
  • x 3
  • el 2
  • n 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications