Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  1. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.02
    0.0205279 = product of:
      0.0410558 = sum of:
        0.0410558 = sum of:
          0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003609657 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03744614 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  2. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.02
    0.0205279 = product of:
      0.0410558 = sum of:
        0.0410558 = sum of:
          0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003609657 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
          0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03744614 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.342-346
  3. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01
    0.0136852665 = product of:
      0.027370533 = sum of:
        0.027370533 = sum of:
          0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.002406438 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.024964094 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024964094 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.6, S.549-568
  4. Rousseau, S.; Rousseau, R.: Metric-wiseness (2015) 0.00
    0.0029778155 = product of:
      0.005955631 = sum of:
        0.005955631 = product of:
          0.011911262 = sum of:
            0.011911262 = weight(_text_:s in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011911262 = score(doc=6069,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.11, S.2389
  5. Rousseau, R.: ¬A table for estimating the exponent in Lotka's law (1993) 0.00
    0.002406438 = product of:
      0.004812876 = sum of:
        0.004812876 = product of:
          0.009625752 = sum of:
            0.009625752 = weight(_text_:s in 5653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009625752 = score(doc=5653,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5653, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5653)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 49(1993) no.4, S.409-412
  6. Yan, S.; Rousseau, R.; Huang, S.: Contributions of chinese authors in PLOS ONE (2016) 0.00
    0.0018235322 = product of:
      0.0036470643 = sum of:
        0.0036470643 = product of:
          0.0072941286 = sum of:
            0.0072941286 = weight(_text_:s in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0072941286 = score(doc=2765,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.14564252 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.3, S.543-549
  7. Rousseau, R.: Egghe's g-index is not a proper concentration measure (2015) 0.00
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = product of:
          0.007219314 = sum of:
            0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007219314 = score(doc=1864,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1518-1519
  8. Rousseau, R.: On Egghe's construction of Lorenz curves (2007) 0.00
    0.0015040238 = product of:
      0.0030080476 = sum of:
        0.0030080476 = product of:
          0.006016095 = sum of:
            0.006016095 = weight(_text_:s in 521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006016095 = score(doc=521,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 521, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=521)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.10, S.1551-1552
  9. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Rousseau, S.: TOP-curves (2007) 0.00
    0.0014889077 = product of:
      0.0029778155 = sum of:
        0.0029778155 = product of:
          0.005955631 = sum of:
            0.005955631 = weight(_text_:s in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005955631 = score(doc=50,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.6, S.777-785
  10. Jin, B.; Li, L.; Rousseau, R.: Long-term influences of interventions in the normal development of science : China and the cultural revolution (2004) 0.00
    0.0012762066 = product of:
      0.0025524131 = sum of:
        0.0025524131 = product of:
          0.0051048263 = sum of:
            0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 2232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0051048263 = score(doc=2232,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 2232, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2232)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Intellectual and technological talents and skills are the driving force for scientific and industrial development, especially in our times characterized by a knowledgebased economy. Major events in society and related political decisions, however, can have a long-term effect an a country's scientific weIl-being. Although the Cultural Revolution took place from 1966 to 1976, its aftermath can still be felt. This is shown by this study of the production and productivity of Chinese scientists as a function of their age. Based an the 1995-2000 data from the Chinese Science Citation database (CSCD), this article investigates the year-by-year age distribution of scientific and technological personnel publishing in China. It is shown that the "Talent Fault" originating during the Cultural Revolution still exists, and that a new gap resulting from recent brain drain might be developing. The purpose of this work is to provide necessary information about the current situation and especially the existing problems of the S&T workforce in China.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.6, S.544-550
  11. Impe, S. van; Rousseau, R.: Web-to-print citations and the humanities (2006) 0.00
    0.0012762066 = product of:
      0.0025524131 = sum of:
        0.0025524131 = product of:
          0.0051048263 = sum of:
            0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0051048263 = score(doc=82,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.422-426
  12. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011) 0.00
    0.0012762066 = product of:
      0.0025524131 = sum of:
        0.0025524131 = product of:
          0.0051048263 = sum of:
            0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0051048263 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Erratum. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1637-1644
  13. Rousseau, S.; Rousseau, R.: Interactions between journal attributes and authors' willingness to wait for editorial decisions (2012) 0.00
    0.0012762066 = product of:
      0.0025524131 = sum of:
        0.0025524131 = product of:
          0.0051048263 = sum of:
            0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0051048263 = score(doc=250,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.6, S.1213-1225
  14. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Duality in information retrieval and the hypegeometric distribution (1997) 0.00
    0.001203219 = product of:
      0.002406438 = sum of:
        0.002406438 = product of:
          0.004812876 = sum of:
            0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004812876 = score(doc=647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 53(1997) no.5, S.499-496
  15. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature (2000) 0.00
    0.001203219 = product of:
      0.002406438 = sum of:
        0.002406438 = product of:
          0.004812876 = sum of:
            0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004812876 = score(doc=4385,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.158-165
  16. Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model (2009) 0.00
    0.001203219 = product of:
      0.002406438 = sum of:
        0.002406438 = product of:
          0.004812876 = sum of:
            0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004812876 = score(doc=6759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.11, S.2362-2365
  17. Rousseau, R.; Ye, F.Y.: ¬A proposal for a dynamic h-type index (2008) 0.00
    0.001203219 = product of:
      0.002406438 = sum of:
        0.002406438 = product of:
          0.004812876 = sum of:
            0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004812876 = score(doc=2351,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.11, S.1853-1855
  18. Zhang, L.; Rousseau, R.; Glänzel, W.: Document-type country profiles (2011) 0.00
    0.001203219 = product of:
      0.002406438 = sum of:
        0.002406438 = product of:
          0.004812876 = sum of:
            0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 4487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004812876 = score(doc=4487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1403-1411
  19. Liu, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Citation analysis and the development of science : a case study using articles by some Nobel prize winners (2014) 0.00
    0.001203219 = product of:
      0.002406438 = sum of:
        0.002406438 = product of:
          0.004812876 = sum of:
            0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 1197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004812876 = score(doc=1197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.281-289
  20. Rousseau, R.: Journal evaluation : technical and practical issues (2002) 0.00
    0.0010635054 = product of:
      0.0021270108 = sum of:
        0.0021270108 = product of:
          0.0042540217 = sum of:
            0.0042540217 = weight(_text_:s in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042540217 = score(doc=816,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This essay provides an overview of journal evaluation indicators. It highlights the strengths and weaknesses of different indicators, together with their range of applicability. The definition of a "quality journal," different notions of impact factors, the meaning of ranking journals, and possible biases in citation databases are also discussed. Attention is given to using the journal impact in evaluation studies. The quality of a journal is a multifaceted notion. Journals can be evaluated for different purposes, and hence the results of such evaluation exercises can be quite different depending on the indicator(s) used. The impact factor, in one of its versions, is probably the most used indicator when it comes to gauging the visibility of a journal on the research front. Generalized impact factors, over periods longer than the traditional two years, are better indicators for the long-term value of a journal. As with all evaluation studies, care must be exercised when considering journal impact factors as a quality indicator. It seems best to use a whole battery of indicators (including several impact factors) and to change this group of indicators depending on the purpose of the evaluation study. Nowadays it goes without saying that special attention is paid to e-journals and specific indicators for this type of journal.
    Source
    Library trends. 50(2002) no.3, S.418-439