Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.03
    0.027370533 = product of:
      0.054741066 = sum of:
        0.054741066 = sum of:
          0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004812876 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.04992819 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04992819 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
    Source
    Journal of educational media and library sciences. 47(2006) no.2, S.153-171
  2. Dousa, T.M.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.: Epistemological and methodological eclecticism in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs) : the case of analytico-synthetic KOSs (2014) 0.02
    0.017106583 = product of:
      0.034213167 = sum of:
        0.034213167 = sum of:
          0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0030080476 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
          0.03120512 = weight(_text_:22 in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03120512 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.152-159
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Dousa, T.M.: Categories and the architectonics of system in Julius Otto Kaiser's method of systematic indexing (2014) 0.02
    0.017106583 = product of:
      0.034213167 = sum of:
        0.034213167 = sum of:
          0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0030080476 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
          0.03120512 = weight(_text_:22 in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03120512 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.160-167
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  4. Grolier, E. de: ¬A study of general categories applicable to classification and coding in documentation (1962) 0.00
    0.002406438 = product of:
      0.004812876 = sum of:
        0.004812876 = product of:
          0.009625752 = sum of:
            0.009625752 = weight(_text_:s in 3388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009625752 = score(doc=3388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 3388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3388)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    248 S
  5. Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬A brief introduction to facets in knowledge organization (2017) 0.00
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = product of:
          0.007219314 = sum of:
            0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 1131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007219314 = score(doc=1131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1131)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.1-6
  6. Austin, D.: Basic concept classes and primitive relations (1982) 0.00
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = product of:
          0.007219314 = sum of:
            0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 6580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007219314 = score(doc=6580,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 6580, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6580)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.86-94
  7. Smiraglia, R.P.: Facets for clustering and disambiguation : the domain discourse of facets in knowledge organization (2017) 0.00
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = product of:
          0.007219314 = sum of:
            0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 4153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007219314 = score(doc=4153,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4153, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4153)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.115-138
  8. LaBarre, K.: Interrogating facet theory : decolonizing knowledge organization (2017) 0.00
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = product of:
          0.007219314 = sum of:
            0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007219314 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.7-30
  9. Satija, M.P.; Oh, D.-G.: ¬The DDC and the knowledge categories : Dewey did faceting without knowing it (2017) 0.00
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = product of:
          0.007219314 = sum of:
            0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007219314 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.39-54
  10. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 3: facets (2017) 0.00
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = product of:
          0.007219314 = sum of:
            0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007219314 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.55-68
  11. Szostak, R.: Facet analysis without facet indicators (2017) 0.00
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = product of:
          0.007219314 = sum of:
            0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 4159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007219314 = score(doc=4159,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4159, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4159)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.69-86
  12. Milonas, E.: ¬An examination of facets within search engine result pages (2017) 0.00
    0.0018048285 = product of:
      0.003609657 = sum of:
        0.003609657 = product of:
          0.007219314 = sum of:
            0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007219314 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.87-114
  13. Mills, J.; Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification : Introduction and auxiliary schedules (1992) 0.00
    0.001203219 = product of:
      0.002406438 = sum of:
        0.002406438 = product of:
          0.004812876 = sum of:
            0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004812876 = score(doc=821,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    267 S
  14. Dimensions of knowledge : facets for knowledge organization (2017) 0.00
    0.0010635054 = product of:
      0.0021270108 = sum of:
        0.0021270108 = product of:
          0.0042540217 = sum of:
            0.0042540217 = weight(_text_:s in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042540217 = score(doc=4154,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    151 S
    Type
    s
  15. Star, S.L.: Grounded classification : grounded theory and faceted classification (1998) 0.00
    0.0010528166 = product of:
      0.0021056333 = sum of:
        0.0021056333 = product of:
          0.0042112665 = sum of:
            0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0042112665 = score(doc=851,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 47(1998) no.2, S.218-232
  16. Mills, J.: Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval (2004) 0.00
    9.0241426E-4 = product of:
      0.0018048285 = sum of:
        0.0018048285 = product of:
          0.003609657 = sum of:
            0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003609657 = score(doc=831,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 52(2004) no.3, S.515-540
  17. Raju, A.A.N.: Colon Classification: theory and practice : a self instructional manual (2001) 0.00
    7.520119E-4 = product of:
      0.0015040238 = sum of:
        0.0015040238 = product of:
          0.0030080476 = sum of:
            0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0030080476 = score(doc=1482,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    xxx S
  18. Gnoli, C.: ¬The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications (2006) 0.00
    7.520119E-4 = product of:
      0.0015040238 = sum of:
        0.0015040238 = product of:
          0.0030080476 = sum of:
            0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0030080476 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.11-18
  19. Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains : special issue on facet analysis (2008) 0.00
    7.520119E-4 = product of:
      0.0015040238 = sum of:
        0.0015040238 = product of:
          0.0030080476 = sum of:
            0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0030080476 = score(doc=3262,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 36(2009) no.1, S.62-63 (K. La Barre): "This special issue of Axiomathes presents an ambitious dual agenda. It attempts to highlight aspects of facet analysis (as used in LIS) that are shared by cognate approaches in philosophy, psychology, linguistics and computer science. Secondarily, the issue aims to attract others to the study and use of facet analysis. The authors represent a blend of lifetime involvement with facet analysis, such as Vickery, Broughton, Beghtol, and Dahlberg; those with well developed research agendas such as Tudhope, and Priss; and relative newcomers such as Gnoli, Cheti and Paradisi, and Slavic. Omissions are inescapable, but a more balanced issue would have resulted from inclusion of at least one researcher from the Indian school of facet theory. Another valuable addition might have been a reaction to the issue by one of the chief critics of facet analysis. Potentially useful, but absent, is a comprehensive bibliography of resources for those wishing to engage in further study, that now lie scattered throughout the issue. Several of the papers assume relative familiarity with facet analytical concepts and definitions, some of which are contested even within LIS. Gnoli's introduction (p. 127-130) traces the trajectory, extensions and new developments of this analytico- synthetic approach to subject access, while providing a laundry list of cognate approaches that are similar to facet analysis. This brief essay and the article by Priss (p. 243-255) directly addresses this first part of Gnoli's agenda. Priss provides detailed discussion of facet-like structures in computer science (p. 245- 246), and outlines the similarity between Formal Concept Analysis and facets. This comparison is equally fruitful for researchers in computer science and library and information science. By bridging into a discussion of visualization challenges for facet display, further research is also invited. Many of the remaining papers comprehensively detail the intellectual heritage of facet analysis (Beghtol; Broughton, p. 195-198; Dahlberg; Tudhope and Binding, p. 213-215; Vickery). Beghtol's (p. 131-144) examination of the origins of facet theory through the lens of the textbooks written by Ranganathan's mentor W.C.B. Sayers (1881-1960), Manual of Classification (1926, 1944, 1955) and a textbook written by Mills A Modern Outline of Classification (1964), serves to reveal the deep intellectual heritage of the changes in classification theory over time, as well as Ranganathan's own influence on and debt to Sayers.
    Pages
    144 S
    Source
    Axiomathes. 18(2008) no.2, S.127-271
    Type
    s
  20. Frické, M.: Faceted classification : orthogonal facets and graphs of foci? (2011) 0.00
    7.520119E-4 = product of:
      0.0015040238 = sum of:
        0.0015040238 = product of:
          0.0030080476 = sum of:
            0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 4850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0030080476 = score(doc=4850,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4850, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4850)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 38(2011) no.6, S.491-502