Search (529 results, page 1 of 27)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.04
    0.0410558 = product of:
      0.0821116 = sum of:
        0.0821116 = sum of:
          0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007219314 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
          0.07489228 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07489228 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  2. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.04
    0.03658085 = product of:
      0.0731617 = sum of:
        0.0731617 = product of:
          0.2926468 = sum of:
            0.2926468 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2926468 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39053032 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  3. Eyert, F.: Mathematische Wissenschaftskommunikation in der digitalen Gesellschaft (2023) 0.03
    0.034213167 = product of:
      0.06842633 = sum of:
        0.06842633 = sum of:
          0.006016095 = weight(_text_:s in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.006016095 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
          0.06241024 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06241024 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2023, H.1, S.22-25
  4. Scheven, E.: Geokoordinaten in Bibliotheksdaten : Grundlage für innovative Nachnutzung (2015) 0.03
    0.027370533 = product of:
      0.054741066 = sum of:
        0.054741066 = sum of:
          0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004812876 = score(doc=308,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 308, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=308)
          0.04992819 = weight(_text_:22 in 308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04992819 = score(doc=308,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 308, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=308)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2015 18:22:47
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 2(2015) Nr.1, S.15-26
  5. Schleim, S.: Warum die Wissenschaft nicht frei ist (2017) 0.03
    0.027370533 = product of:
      0.054741066 = sum of:
        0.054741066 = sum of:
          0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004812876 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
          0.04992819 = weight(_text_:22 in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04992819 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.10.2017 15:48:22
  6. Schaat, S.: Von der automatisierten Manipulation zur Manipulation der Automatisierung (2019) 0.03
    0.027370533 = product of:
      0.054741066 = sum of:
        0.054741066 = sum of:
          0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004812876 = score(doc=4996,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
          0.04992819 = weight(_text_:22 in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04992819 = score(doc=4996,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 2.2019 17:22:00
  7. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.03
    0.027370533 = product of:
      0.054741066 = sum of:
        0.054741066 = sum of:
          0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004812876 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
          0.04992819 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04992819 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  8. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021) 0.03
    0.027370533 = product of:
      0.054741066 = sum of:
        0.054741066 = sum of:
          0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004812876 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
          0.04992819 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04992819 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  9. Bager, J.: ¬Die Text-KI ChatGPT schreibt Fachtexte, Prosa, Gedichte und Programmcode (2023) 0.03
    0.027370533 = product of:
      0.054741066 = sum of:
        0.054741066 = sum of:
          0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004812876 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
          0.04992819 = weight(_text_:22 in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04992819 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29.12.2022 18:22:55
    Source
    c't. 2023, H.1, S.46- [https://www.heise.de/select/ct/2023/1/2233908274346530870]
  10. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.02
    0.023949215 = product of:
      0.04789843 = sum of:
        0.04789843 = sum of:
          0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0042112665 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.043687165 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043687165 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  11. Pany, T.: Konfusion in der Medienrepublik : Der Überraschungseffekt der Youtuber (2019) 0.02
    0.023949215 = product of:
      0.04789843 = sum of:
        0.04789843 = sum of:
          0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 5244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0042112665 = score(doc=5244,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5244, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5244)
          0.043687165 = weight(_text_:22 in 5244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043687165 = score(doc=5244,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5244, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5244)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: Dörner, S.:"CDU-Zerstörer" Rezo: Es kamen "Diskreditierung, Lügen, Trump-Wordings und keine inhaltliche Auseinandersetzung" [22. Mai 2019]. Interview mit Rezo. Unter: https://www.heise.de/tp/features/CDU-Zerstoerer-Rezo-Es-kamen-Diskreditierung-Luegen-Trump-Wordings-und-keine-inhaltliche-4428522.html?view=print [http://www.heise.de/-4428522].
  12. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.02206535 = product of:
      0.0441307 = sum of:
        0.0441307 = product of:
          0.0882614 = sum of:
            0.0882614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0882614 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  13. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.02
    0.02206535 = product of:
      0.0441307 = sum of:
        0.0441307 = product of:
          0.0882614 = sum of:
            0.0882614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0882614 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  14. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.02
    0.021843582 = product of:
      0.043687165 = sum of:
        0.043687165 = product of:
          0.08737433 = sum of:
            0.08737433 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08737433 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046063907 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  15. Zanibbi, R.; Yuan, B.: Keyword and image-based retrieval for mathematical expressions (2011) 0.02
    0.021275483 = product of:
      0.042550966 = sum of:
        0.042550966 = sum of:
          0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0051048263 = score(doc=3449,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
          0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03744614 = score(doc=3449,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Two new methods for retrieving mathematical expressions using conventional keyword search and expression images are presented. An expression-level TF-IDF (term frequency-inverse document frequency) approach is used for keyword search, where queries and indexed expressions are represented by keywords taken from LATEX strings. TF-IDF is computed at the level of individual expressions rather than documents to increase the precision of matching. The second retrieval technique is a form of Content-Base Image Retrieval (CBIR). Expressions are segmented into connected components, and then components in the query expression and each expression in the collection are matched using contour and density features, aspect ratios, and relative positions. In an experiment using ten randomly sampled queries from a corpus of over 22,000 expressions, precision-at-k (k= 20) for the keyword-based approach was higher (keyword: µ= 84.0,s= 19.0, image-based:µ= 32.0,s= 30.7), but for a few of the queries better results were obtained using a combination of the two techniques.
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:53:49
  16. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.02
    0.0205279 = product of:
      0.0410558 = sum of:
        0.0410558 = sum of:
          0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003609657 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03744614 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  17. Franke, F.: ¬Das Framework for Information Literacy : neue Impulse für die Förderung von Informationskompetenz in Deutschland?! (2017) 0.02
    0.0205279 = product of:
      0.0410558 = sum of:
        0.0410558 = sum of:
          0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 2248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003609657 = score(doc=2248,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2248, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2248)
          0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 2248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03744614 = score(doc=2248,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2248, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2248)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 4(2017) Nr.4, S.22-29
  18. Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.02
    0.0205279 = product of:
      0.0410558 = sum of:
        0.0410558 = sum of:
          0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003609657 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
          0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03744614 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The term "facet" was introduced into the field of library classification systems by Ranganathan in the 1930's [Ranganathan, 1962]. A facet is a viewpoint or aspect. In contrast to traditional classification systems, faceted systems are modular in that a domain is analyzed in terms of baseline facets which are then synthesized. In this paper, the term "facet" is used in a broader meaning. Facets can describe different aspects on the same level of abstraction or the same aspect on different levels of abstraction. The notion of facets is related to database views, multicontexts and conceptual scaling in formal concept analysis [Ganter and Wille, 1999], polymorphism in object-oriented design, aspect-oriented programming, views and contexts in description logic and semantic networks. This paper presents a definition of facets in terms of faceted knowledge representation that incorporates the traditional narrower notion of facets and potentially facilitates translation between different knowledge representation formalisms. A goal of this approach is a modular, machine-aided knowledge base design mechanism. A possible application is faceted thesaurus construction for information retrieval and data mining. Reasoning complexity depends on the size of the modules (facets). A more general analysis of complexity will be left for future research.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  19. Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016) 0.02
    0.0205279 = product of:
      0.0410558 = sum of:
        0.0410558 = sum of:
          0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003609657 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
          0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03744614 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 5.2016 19:22:40
    Source
    Jlis.it. 7(2016) no.2, S.25-47
  20. Knoll, A.: Kompetenzprofil von Information Professionals in Unternehmen (2016) 0.02
    0.0205279 = product of:
      0.0410558 = sum of:
        0.0410558 = sum of:
          0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003609657 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03744614 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046063907 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 7.2016 16:22:54
    Source
    Young information scientists. 1(2016), S.1-11

Languages

  • e 289
  • d 229
  • i 6
  • f 2
  • a 1
  • el 1
  • es 1
  • More… Less…