-
Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010)
0.03
0.027370533 = product of:
0.054741066 = sum of:
0.054741066 = sum of:
0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004812876 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.04992819 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04992819 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.112-123
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013)
0.02
0.0205279 = product of:
0.0410558 = sum of:
0.0410558 = sum of:
0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003609657 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03744614 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.libreas.eu/09treude.htm. Bezug zu: Alon Friedman, Richard P. Smiraglia, (2013): Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization. In: Journal of Documentation, Vol. 69/1, S.27-48.
- Source
- LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
-
Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012)
0.02
0.017729571 = product of:
0.035459142 = sum of:
0.035459142 = sum of:
0.0042540217 = weight(_text_:s in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0042540217 = score(doc=33,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
0.03120512 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03120512 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The concept of concept has seldom been examined in its entirety, and the term very seldom defined. The rigidity, or lack thereof, and the homogeneity, or lack thereof, of concepts, are only two of their characteristics that have been debated. These issues are reviewed in this paper, namely: 1) does a concept represent its referent(s), or is it a free creation of the mind?; 2) can a concept be analyzed in parts or elements?; 3) must a concept be general, i.e., refer to a category or a type, or can it refer to a single object, physical or mental?; 4) are concepts as clearly delimited as terms are? Are concepts voiceless terms?; and, 5) what do terms contribute to an individual's and a community's conceptual richness? As regards the relationship of concepts with their referents in the stage of formation, it seems reasonable to conclude that said relationship may be close in some concepts, less close in others, and lacking altogether in some cases. The set of elements of a concept, which varies from individual to individual and across time inside the same individual, is called the intension of a concept. The set of referents of a concept is called the extension of that concept. Most concepts don't have a clearly delimited extension: their referents form a fuzzy set. The aspects of a concept's intension form a scale of generality. A concept is not equal to the term that describes it; rather, many terms are joined to concepts. Language, therefore, renders a gamut of services to the development, consolidation, and communication of conceptual richness.
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:11:25
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.29-54
-
Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014)
0.02
0.017106583 = product of:
0.034213167 = sum of:
0.034213167 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.03120512 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03120512 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.312-319
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Onofri, A.: Concepts in context (2013)
0.00
0.0010528166 = product of:
0.0021056333 = sum of:
0.0021056333 = product of:
0.0042112665 = sum of:
0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 1077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0042112665 = score(doc=1077,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1077, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- My thesis discusses two related problems that have taken center stage in the recent literature on concepts: 1) What are the individuation conditions of concepts? Under what conditions is a concept Cv(1) the same concept as a concept Cv(2)? 2) What are the possession conditions of concepts? What conditions must be satisfied for a thinker to have a concept C? The thesis defends a novel account of concepts, which I call "pluralist-contextualist": 1) Pluralism: Different concepts have different kinds of individuation and possession conditions: some concepts are individuated more "coarsely", have less demanding possession conditions and are widely shared, while other concepts are individuated more "finely" and not shared. 2) Contextualism: When a speaker ascribes a propositional attitude to a subject S, or uses his ascription to explain/predict S's behavior, the speaker's intentions in the relevant context determine the correct individuation conditions for the concepts involved in his report. In chapters 1-3 I defend a contextualist, non-Millian theory of propositional attitude ascriptions. Then, I show how contextualism can be used to offer a novel perspective on the problem of concept individuation/possession. More specifically, I employ contextualism to provide a new, more effective argument for Fodor's "publicity principle": if contextualism is true, then certain specific concepts must be shared in order for interpersonally applicable psychological generalizations to be possible. In chapters 4-5 I raise a tension between publicity and another widely endorsed principle, the "Fregean constraint" (FC): subjects who are unaware of certain identity facts and find themselves in so-called "Frege cases" must have distinct concepts for the relevant object x. For instance: the ancient astronomers had distinct concepts (HESPERUS/PHOSPHORUS) for the same object (the planet Venus). First, I examine some leading theories of concepts and argue that they cannot meet both of our constraints at the same time. Then, I offer principled reasons to think that no theory can satisfy (FC) while also respecting publicity. (FC) appears to require a form of holism, on which a concept is individuated by its global inferential role in a subject S and can thus only be shared by someone who has exactly the same inferential dispositions as S. This explains the tension between publicity and (FC), since holism is clearly incompatible with concept shareability. To solve the tension, I suggest adopting my pluralist-contextualist proposal: concepts involved in Frege cases are holistically individuated and not public, while other concepts are more coarsely individuated and widely shared; given this "plurality" of concepts, we will then need contextual factors (speakers' intentions) to "select" the specific concepts to be employed in our intentional generalizations in the relevant contexts. In chapter 6 I develop the view further by contrasting it with some rival accounts. First, I examine a very different kind of pluralism about concepts, which has been recently defended by Daniel Weiskopf, and argue that it is insufficiently radical. Then, I consider the inferentialist accounts defended by authors like Peacocke, Rey and Jackson. Such views, I argue, are committed to an implausible picture of reference determination, on which our inferential dispositions fix the reference of our concepts: this leads to wrong predictions in all those cases of scientific disagreement where two parties have very different inferential dispositions and yet seem to refer to the same natural kind.
- Pages
- 243 S
-
Gemberling, T.: FRSAD, Semiotics, and FRBR-LRM (2016)
0.00
0.0010528166 = product of:
0.0021056333 = sum of:
0.0021056333 = product of:
0.0042112665 = sum of:
0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0042112665 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 54(2016) no.2, S.136-144
-
Hjoerland, B.: Concepts, paradigms and knowledge organization (2010)
0.00
9.0241426E-4 = product of:
0.0018048285 = sum of:
0.0018048285 = product of:
0.003609657 = sum of:
0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 3512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003609657 = score(doc=3512,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3512, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3512)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.38-42
-
Friedman, A.; Thellefsen, M.: Concept theory and semiotics in knowledge organization (2011)
0.00
9.0241426E-4 = product of:
0.0018048285 = sum of:
0.0018048285 = product of:
0.003609657 = sum of:
0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003609657 = score(doc=292,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 67(2011) no.4, S.644-674
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Kammerer, K.A.; Bennett, R.: ¬The aboutness of words (2017)
0.00
9.0241426E-4 = product of:
0.0018048285 = sum of:
0.0018048285 = product of:
0.003609657 = sum of:
0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 3835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003609657 = score(doc=3835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.10, S.2471-2483
-
Tognoli, N.B.; Rodrigues, A.C.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.: Archival knowledge : conceptual frameworks for recent terminology in the KO domain (2019)
0.00
9.0241426E-4 = product of:
0.0018048285 = sum of:
0.0018048285 = product of:
0.003609657 = sum of:
0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 5637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003609657 = score(doc=5637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5637)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 46(2019) no.7, S.522-529
-
Brandom, R.B.: Begründen und Begreifen : eine Einführung in den Inferentialismus (2016)
0.00
9.0241426E-4 = product of:
0.0018048285 = sum of:
0.0018048285 = product of:
0.003609657 = sum of:
0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003609657 = score(doc=493,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 493, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=493)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- 263 S
-
ISO/DIS 5127: Information and documentation - foundation and vocabulary (2013)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 6070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=6070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 6070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6070)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- 221 S
-
Szostak, R.: Complex concepts into basic concepts (2011)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 4926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=4926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4926)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.11, S.2247-2265
-
Hjoerland, B.: Are relations in thesauri "context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds"? (2015)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1367-1373
-
Thellefsen, M.M.; Thellefsen, T.; Sørensen, B.: Information as signs : a semiotic analysis of the information concept, determining its ontological and epistemological foundations (2018)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 4241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=4241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 74(2018) no.2, S.372-382
-
Machado, L.M.O.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Simões, M.da Graça de Melo: Concept theory in library and information science : an epistemological analysis (2019)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 5457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=5457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5457)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 75(2019) no.4, S.876-891
