Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.014366019 = product of:
  0.028732037 = sum of:
    0.028732037 = product of:
      0.057464074 = sum of:
        0.057464074 = weight(_text_:m in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057464074 = score(doc=81,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045820985 = queryNorm
            0.5039684 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Papers written by several authors can be classified according to the countries of the author affiliations. The empirical part of this paper consists of two datasets. One dataset consists of 1,035 papers retrieved via the search "pedagog*" in the years 2004 and 2005 (up to October) in Academic Search Elite which is a case where phi(m) = the number of papers with m =1, 2,3 ... authors is decreasing, hence most of the papers have a low number of authors. Here we find that #, m = the number of times a country occurs j times in a m-authored paper, j =1, ..., m-1 is decreasing and that # m, m is much higher than all the other #j, m values. The other dataset consists of 3,271 papers retrieved via the search "enzyme" in the year 2005 (up to October) in the same database which is a case of a non-decreasing phi(m): most papers have 3 or 4 authors and we even find many papers with a much higher number of authors. In this case we show again that # m, m is much higher than the other #j, m values but that #j, m is not decreasing anymore in j =1, ..., m-1, although #1, m is (apart from # m, m) the largest number amongst the #j,m. The combinatorial part gives a proof of the fact that #j,m decreases for j = 1, m-1, supposing that all cases are equally possible. This shows that the first dataset is more conform with this model than the second dataset. Explanations for these findings are given. From the data we also find the (we think: new) distribution of number of papers with n =1, 2,3,... countries (i.e. where there are n different countries involved amongst the m (a n) authors of a paper): a fast decreasing function e.g. as a power law with a very large Lotka exponent.

0.012539689 = product of:
  0.025079379 = sum of:
    0.025079379 = product of:
      0.050158758 = sum of:
        0.050158758 = weight(_text_:m in 3058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050158758 = score(doc=3058,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045820985 = queryNorm
            0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 3058, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3058)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article studies the probabilities of the occurence of multi-word (m-word) phrases (m=2,3,...) in relation to the probabilities of occurence of the single words. It is well known that, in the latter case, the lae of Zipf is valid (i.e., a power law). We prove that in the case of m-word phrases (m>=2), this is not the case. We present 2 independent proof of this

0.009312166 = product of:
  0.018624332 = sum of:
    0.018624332 = product of:
      0.037248664 = sum of:
        0.037248664 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037248664 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045820985 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170

0.005486114 = product of:
  0.010972228 = sum of:
    0.010972228 = product of:
      0.021944456 = sum of:
        0.021944456 = weight(_text_:m in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021944456 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045820985 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Type

m

0.003918653 = product of:
  0.007837306 = sum of:
    0.007837306 = product of:
      0.015674612 = sum of:
        0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015674612 = score(doc=5226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045820985 = queryNorm
            0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Type

m