Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Zitt, M."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Zitt, M.; Lelu, A.; Bassecoulard, E.: Hybrid citation-word representations in science mapping : Portolan charts of research fields? (2011) 0.03 
    0.02909489 = product of:
  0.05818978 = sum of:
    0.05818978 = sum of:
      0.027149223 = weight(_text_:m in 4130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027149223 = score(doc=4130,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045820985 = queryNorm
          0.2381027 = fieldWeight in 4130, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4130)
      0.031040555 = weight(_text_:22 in 4130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031040555 = score(doc=4130,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045820985 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4130, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4130)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The mapping of scientific fields, based on principles established in the seventies, has recently shown a remarkable development and applications are now booming with progress in computing efficiency. We examine here the convergence of two thematic mapping approaches, citation-based and word-based, which rely on quite different sociological backgrounds. A corpus in the nanoscience field was broken down into research themes, using the same clustering technique on the 2 networks separately. The tool for comparison is the table of intersections of the M clusters (here M=50) built on either side. A classical visual exploitation of such contingency tables is based on correspondence analysis. We investigate a rearrangement of the intersection table (block modeling), resulting in pseudo-map. The interest of this representation for confronting the two breakdowns is discussed. The amount of convergence found is, in our view, a strong argument in favor of the reliability of bibliometric mapping. However, the outcomes are not convergent at the degree where they can be substituted for each other. Differences highlight the complementarity between approaches based on different networks. In contrast with the strong informetric posture found in recent literature, where lexical and citation markers are considered as miscible tokens, the framework proposed here does not mix the two elements at an early stage, in compliance with their contrasted logic.
    Date
    8. 1.2011 18:22:50
  2. Zitt, M.: Meso-level retrieval : IR-bibliometrics interplay and hybrid citation-words methods in scientific fields delineation (2015) 0.01 
    0.007837306 = product of:
  0.015674612 = sum of:
    0.015674612 = product of:
      0.031349223 = sum of:
        0.031349223 = weight(_text_:m in 1692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031349223 = score(doc=1692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045820985 = queryNorm
            0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 1692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1692)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Zitt, M.; Perrot, F.; Barré, R.: ¬The transition from 'national' to 'transnational' model and related measures of countries' performance (1998) 0.00 
    0.0047023837 = product of:
  0.009404767 = sum of:
    0.009404767 = product of:
      0.018809535 = sum of:
        0.018809535 = weight(_text_:m in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018809535 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045820985 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  4. Zitt, M.; Small, H.: Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting : the audience factor (2008) 0.00 
    0.0047023837 = product of:
  0.009404767 = sum of:
    0.009404767 = product of:
      0.018809535 = sum of:
        0.018809535 = weight(_text_:m in 2363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018809535 = score(doc=2363,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045820985 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2363, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2363)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Years