Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.024832444 = product of:
      0.04966489 = sum of:
        0.04966489 = product of:
          0.09932978 = sum of:
            0.09932978 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09932978 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  2. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.021948986 = product of:
      0.04389797 = sum of:
        0.04389797 = product of:
          0.08779594 = sum of:
            0.08779594 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08779594 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  3. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.013169393 = product of:
      0.026338786 = sum of:
        0.026338786 = product of:
          0.05267757 = sum of:
            0.05267757 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05267757 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  4. Nacke, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne (1980) 0.01
    0.009404767 = product of:
      0.018809535 = sum of:
        0.018809535 = product of:
          0.03761907 = sum of:
            0.03761907 = weight(_text_:m in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03761907 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  5. Nacke, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse (1980) 0.01
    0.009404767 = product of:
      0.018809535 = sum of:
        0.018809535 = product of:
          0.03761907 = sum of:
            0.03761907 = weight(_text_:m in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03761907 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  6. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01
    0.009312166 = product of:
      0.018624332 = sum of:
        0.018624332 = product of:
          0.037248664 = sum of:
            0.037248664 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037248664 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  7. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.01
    0.009312166 = product of:
      0.018624332 = sum of:
        0.018624332 = product of:
          0.037248664 = sum of:
            0.037248664 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037248664 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  8. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01
    0.009312166 = product of:
      0.018624332 = sum of:
        0.018624332 = product of:
          0.037248664 = sum of:
            0.037248664 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037248664 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  9. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.01
    0.007837306 = product of:
      0.015674612 = sum of:
        0.015674612 = product of:
          0.031349223 = sum of:
            0.031349223 = weight(_text_:m in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031349223 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  10. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.01
    0.0077601387 = product of:
      0.015520277 = sum of:
        0.015520277 = product of:
          0.031040555 = sum of:
            0.031040555 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031040555 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
  11. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Abdoli, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: In which fields are citations indicators of research quality? (2023) 0.01
    0.0067873057 = product of:
      0.013574611 = sum of:
        0.013574611 = product of:
          0.027149223 = sum of:
            0.027149223 = weight(_text_:m in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027149223 = score(doc=1033,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.2381027 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Persson, O.; Beckmann, M.: Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialities (1995) 0.01
    0.0062698447 = product of:
      0.012539689 = sum of:
        0.012539689 = product of:
          0.025079379 = sum of:
            0.025079379 = weight(_text_:m in 3300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025079379 = score(doc=3300,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 3300, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3300)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005) 0.01
    0.0062698447 = product of:
      0.012539689 = sum of:
        0.012539689 = product of:
          0.025079379 = sum of:
            0.025079379 = weight(_text_:m in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025079379 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01
    0.006208111 = product of:
      0.012416222 = sum of:
        0.012416222 = product of:
          0.024832444 = sum of:
            0.024832444 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024832444 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
  15. Magri, M.; Solari, A.: ¬The SCI Journal Citation Reports : a potential tool for studying journals? (1996) 0.01
    0.005486114 = product of:
      0.010972228 = sum of:
        0.010972228 = product of:
          0.021944456 = sum of:
            0.021944456 = weight(_text_:m in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021944456 = score(doc=5076,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Tsay, M.-Y.: From Science Citation Index to Journal Citation Reports, amd criteria for journals evaluation (1997) 0.01
    0.005486114 = product of:
      0.010972228 = sum of:
        0.010972228 = product of:
          0.021944456 = sum of:
            0.021944456 = weight(_text_:m in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021944456 = score(doc=657,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Leydesdorff, L.: Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures (2002) 0.01
    0.005486114 = product of:
      0.010972228 = sum of:
        0.010972228 = product of:
          0.021944456 = sum of:
            0.021944456 = weight(_text_:m in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021944456 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Can the inclusion of new journals in the Science Citation Index be used for the indication of structural change in the database, and how can this change be compared with reorganizations of reiations among previously included journals? Change in the number of journals (n) is distinguished from change in the number of journal categories (m). Although the number of journals can be considered as a given at each moment in time, the number of journal categories is based an a reconstruction that is time-stamped ex post. The reflexive reconstruction is in need of an update when new information becomes available in a next year. Implications of this shift towards an evolutionary perspective are specified.
  18. Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000) 0.00
    0.0047023837 = product of:
      0.009404767 = sum of:
        0.009404767 = product of:
          0.018809535 = sum of:
            0.018809535 = weight(_text_:m in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018809535 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
  19. Prime-Claverie, C.; Beigbeder, M.; Lafouge, T.: Transposition of the cocitation method with a view to classifying Web pages (2004) 0.00
    0.0047023837 = product of:
      0.009404767 = sum of:
        0.009404767 = product of:
          0.018809535 = sum of:
            0.018809535 = weight(_text_:m in 3095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018809535 = score(doc=3095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 3095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3095)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.00
    0.00443345 = product of:
      0.0088669 = sum of:
        0.0088669 = product of:
          0.0177338 = sum of:
            0.0177338 = weight(_text_:m in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0177338 = score(doc=3585,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.15552804 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
    Type
    m