Search (164 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.06
    0.06474403 = product of:
      0.12948807 = sum of:
        0.12948807 = sum of:
          0.09268634 = weight(_text_:x in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09268634 = score(doc=590,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045271195 = queryNorm
              0.48484772 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.03680173 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03680173 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045271195 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  2. Wan, X.; Liu, F.: Are all literature citations equally important? : automatic citation strength estimation and its applications (2014) 0.05
    0.045157105 = product of:
      0.09031421 = sum of:
        0.09031421 = sum of:
          0.053512476 = weight(_text_:x in 1350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053512476 = score(doc=1350,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045271195 = queryNorm
              0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 1350, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1350)
          0.03680173 = weight(_text_:22 in 1350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03680173 = score(doc=1350,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045271195 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1350, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1350)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:35
  3. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.04
    0.043982495 = product of:
      0.08796499 = sum of:
        0.08796499 = sum of:
          0.044593733 = weight(_text_:x in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044593733 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045271195 = queryNorm
              0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
          0.043371256 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043371256 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045271195 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
  4. Ye, F.Y.: ¬A theoretical approach to the unification of informetric models by wave-heat equations (2011) 0.03
    0.025226025 = product of:
      0.05045205 = sum of:
        0.05045205 = product of:
          0.1009041 = sum of:
            0.1009041 = weight(_text_:x in 4464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1009041 = score(doc=4464,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.5278353 = fieldWeight in 4464, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A simple distribution function f(x, t)=p(x+q)**-ße**alpha*t obeys wave and heat equations, that constructs a theoretical approach to the unification of informetric models, with which we can unify all informetric laws. While its space-type distributions deduce naturally Lotka-type laws in size approaches and Zipf-type laws in rank approaches, its time-type distributions introduce the mechanism of Price-type and Brookes-type laws.
  5. Liu, X.; Chen, X.: Authors' noninstitutional emails and their correlation with retraction (2021) 0.03
    0.025226025 = product of:
      0.05045205 = sum of:
        0.05045205 = product of:
          0.1009041 = sum of:
            0.1009041 = weight(_text_:x in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1009041 = score(doc=152,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.5278353 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.02
    0.024534488 = product of:
      0.049068976 = sum of:
        0.049068976 = product of:
          0.09813795 = sum of:
            0.09813795 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09813795 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  7. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.024534488 = product of:
      0.049068976 = sum of:
        0.049068976 = product of:
          0.09813795 = sum of:
            0.09813795 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09813795 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  8. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.02
    0.024534488 = product of:
      0.049068976 = sum of:
        0.049068976 = product of:
          0.09813795 = sum of:
            0.09813795 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09813795 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  9. Rip, A.: Qualitative conditions of scientometrics : the new challenges (1997) 0.02
    0.022296866 = product of:
      0.044593733 = sum of:
        0.044593733 = product of:
          0.089187466 = sum of:
            0.089187466 = weight(_text_:x in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089187466 = score(doc=408,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.4665449 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Explains how a closer look at how scientometricians aggregate building blocks into artfully made products, and point-represent these (e.g. as the map of field X) allows one to overcome the dependence on judgements of scientists for validation, and replace or complement these with intrinsic validation, based on quality checks of the several steps
  10. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.02
    0.021685628 = product of:
      0.043371256 = sum of:
        0.043371256 = product of:
          0.08674251 = sum of:
            0.08674251 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08674251 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  11. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.021685628 = product of:
      0.043371256 = sum of:
        0.043371256 = product of:
          0.08674251 = sum of:
            0.08674251 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08674251 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  12. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02
    0.021467676 = product of:
      0.042935353 = sum of:
        0.042935353 = product of:
          0.085870706 = sum of:
            0.085870706 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085870706 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  13. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02
    0.021467676 = product of:
      0.042935353 = sum of:
        0.042935353 = product of:
          0.085870706 = sum of:
            0.085870706 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085870706 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  14. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.02
    0.021467676 = product of:
      0.042935353 = sum of:
        0.042935353 = product of:
          0.085870706 = sum of:
            0.085870706 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085870706 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  15. Cui, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.: Multidimensional scholarly citations : characterizing and understanding scholars' citation behaviors (2023) 0.02
    0.019309655 = product of:
      0.03861931 = sum of:
        0.03861931 = product of:
          0.07723862 = sum of:
            0.07723862 = weight(_text_:x in 847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07723862 = score(doc=847,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.40403977 = fieldWeight in 847, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=847)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.02
    0.018400865 = product of:
      0.03680173 = sum of:
        0.03680173 = product of:
          0.07360346 = sum of:
            0.07360346 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07360346 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  17. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.02
    0.018400865 = product of:
      0.03680173 = sum of:
        0.03680173 = product of:
          0.07360346 = sum of:
            0.07360346 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07360346 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15853201 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  18. Hu, X.: Loads of special authorship functions : linear growth in the percentage of "equal first authors" and corresponding authors (2009) 0.02
    0.017837493 = product of:
      0.035674985 = sum of:
        0.035674985 = product of:
          0.07134997 = sum of:
            0.07134997 = weight(_text_:x in 3159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07134997 = score(doc=3159,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.3732359 = fieldWeight in 3159, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3159)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Prathap, G.: Fractionalized exergy for evaluating research performance (2011) 0.02
    0.017837493 = product of:
      0.035674985 = sum of:
        0.035674985 = product of:
          0.07134997 = sum of:
            0.07134997 = weight(_text_:x in 4918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07134997 = score(doc=4918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.3732359 = fieldWeight in 4918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4918)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The approach based on "thermodynamic" considerations that can quantify research performance using an exergy term defined as X = iC, where i is the impact and C is the number of citations is now extended to cases where fractionalized counting of citations is used instead of integer counting.
  20. Doré, J.-C.; Ojasoo, T.: How to analyze publication time trends by correspondece factor analysis : analysis of publications by 48 countries in 18 disciplines over 12 years (2001) 0.02
    0.015766267 = product of:
      0.031532533 = sum of:
        0.031532533 = product of:
          0.06306507 = sum of:
            0.06306507 = weight(_text_:x in 6030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06306507 = score(doc=6030,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19116588 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045271195 = queryNorm
                0.32989708 = fieldWeight in 6030, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6030)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study is a follow-up to a published Correspondence Factorial Analysis (CFA) of a dataset of over 6 million bibliometric entries (Doré et al. JASIS, 47(8), 588-602,1996), which compared the publication output patterns of 48 countries in 18 disciplines over a 12-year period (1981-1992). It analyzes by methods suitable for investigating short time series how these output patterns evolved over the 12-year span. Three types of approach are described. (1) the chi**2 distances of the publication output patterns from the center of gravity of the multidimensional system-which represents an average world pattern-were calculated for each country and for each year. We noted whether the patterns moved toward or away from the center with time; (2) individual annual output patterns were introduced as supplementary variables into an existing global overview covering the whole time-span [CFA map of (countries x disciplines)]. We observed how these patterns moved about within the map year by year; (3) the matrix (disciplines x time) was analyzed by CFA to derive time trends for each country. CFA revealed the "inner clocks" governing publication trends. The time scale that best fitted the data was not a linear but an elastic scale. Although different countries laid emphasis on publication in different disciplines, the overall tendency was toward greater uniformity in publication patterns with time

Years

Languages

  • e 151
  • d 10
  • f 1
  • m 1
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 157
  • s 3
  • x 3
  • el 2
  • m 2
  • More… Less…