Search (470 results, page 1 of 24)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.04
    0.037745655 = product of:
      0.05661848 = sum of:
        0.012227163 = weight(_text_:m in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012227163 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
        0.044391315 = product of:
          0.073985524 = sum of:
            0.02533864 = weight(_text_:28 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02533864 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1280415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
            0.024433337 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024433337 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12573336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
            0.024213543 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024213543 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12516655 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.6 = coord(3/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    12. 3.2021 18:41:28
  2. Egghe, L.: Empirical and combinatorial study of country occurrences in multi-authored papers (2006) 0.03
    0.032586467 = product of:
      0.048879698 = sum of:
        0.044825517 = weight(_text_:m in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044825517 = score(doc=81,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.5039684 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
        0.0040541827 = product of:
          0.020270912 = sum of:
            0.020270912 = weight(_text_:28 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020270912 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1280415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Papers written by several authors can be classified according to the countries of the author affiliations. The empirical part of this paper consists of two datasets. One dataset consists of 1,035 papers retrieved via the search "pedagog*" in the years 2004 and 2005 (up to October) in Academic Search Elite which is a case where phi(m) = the number of papers with m =1, 2,3 ... authors is decreasing, hence most of the papers have a low number of authors. Here we find that #, m = the number of times a country occurs j times in a m-authored paper, j =1, ..., m-1 is decreasing and that # m, m is much higher than all the other #j, m values. The other dataset consists of 3,271 papers retrieved via the search "enzyme" in the year 2005 (up to October) in the same database which is a case of a non-decreasing phi(m): most papers have 3 or 4 authors and we even find many papers with a much higher number of authors. In this case we show again that # m, m is much higher than the other #j, m values but that #j, m is not decreasing anymore in j =1, ..., m-1, although #1, m is (apart from # m, m) the largest number amongst the #j,m. The combinatorial part gives a proof of the fact that #j,m decreases for j = 1, m-1, supposing that all cases are equally possible. This shows that the first dataset is more conform with this model than the second dataset. Explanations for these findings are given. From the data we also find the (we think: new) distribution of number of papers with n =1, 2,3,... countries (i.e. where there are n different countries involved amongst the m (a n) authors of a paper): a fast decreasing function e.g. as a power law with a very large Lotka exponent.
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:28:10
  3. Herfurth, M.: Voraussetzungen und Entwicklungsperspektiven scientometrischer Analysen auf der Grundlage von Datenbanken (1994) 0.03
    0.032283798 = product of:
      0.048425693 = sum of:
        0.034236055 = weight(_text_:m in 8824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034236055 = score(doc=8824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 8824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8824)
        0.014189638 = product of:
          0.07094819 = sum of:
            0.07094819 = weight(_text_:28 in 8824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07094819 = score(doc=8824,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1280415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.5541031 = fieldWeight in 8824, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8824)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Qualität und Information: Deutscher Dokumentartag 1993; Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 28.-30.9.1993. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer
  4. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.03
    0.03186376 = product of:
      0.04779564 = sum of:
        0.034236055 = weight(_text_:m in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034236055 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
        0.013559583 = product of:
          0.067797914 = sum of:
            0.067797914 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067797914 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12516655 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
    Type
    m
  5. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.03
    0.029573519 = product of:
      0.044360276 = sum of:
        0.017118027 = weight(_text_:m in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017118027 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.027242249 = product of:
          0.06810562 = sum of:
            0.03420667 = weight(_text_:29 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03420667 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12573336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
            0.033898957 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033898957 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12516655 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
    Source
    Art documentation. 17(1998) no.1, S.29-33
  6. Springer, M.: Erlahmt die Forschung? (2023) 0.03
    0.027671825 = product of:
      0.041507736 = sum of:
        0.02934519 = weight(_text_:m in 985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02934519 = score(doc=985,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 985, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=985)
        0.012162547 = product of:
          0.060812734 = sum of:
            0.060812734 = weight(_text_:28 in 985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060812734 = score(doc=985,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1280415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.4749455 = fieldWeight in 985, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=985)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    18. 2.2023 19:12:28
  7. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.03
    0.025858684 = product of:
      0.038788024 = sum of:
        0.024454325 = weight(_text_:m in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024454325 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
        0.0143337 = product of:
          0.0716685 = sum of:
            0.0716685 = weight(_text_:28 in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0716685 = score(doc=461,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1280415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.5597286 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    20. 4.2002 18:28:13
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.1, S.45-46 (M.J. López Huertas u. E. Jiménez-Contreras); Password 2002, H.3, S.14-19 (W.G. Stock)
    Type
    m
  8. Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018) 0.03
    0.025638428 = product of:
      0.03845764 = sum of:
        0.014672595 = weight(_text_:m in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014672595 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
        0.023785045 = product of:
          0.059462614 = sum of:
            0.030406367 = weight(_text_:28 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030406367 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1280415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
            0.02905625 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02905625 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12516655 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    28. 7.2018 10:00:22
  9. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.03
    0.02534873 = product of:
      0.038023096 = sum of:
        0.014672595 = weight(_text_:m in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014672595 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
        0.023350501 = product of:
          0.058376253 = sum of:
            0.029320003 = weight(_text_:29 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029320003 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12573336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
            0.02905625 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02905625 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12516655 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29
  10. Grazia Colonia; Dimmler, E.; Dresel, R.; Messner, C.; Krobath, A.; Petz, S.; Sypien, M.; Boxen, P. van; Harders, M.; Heuer, D.; Jordans, I.; Juchem, K.; Linnertz, M.; Mittelhuber, I.; Schwammel, S.; Schlögl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Informationswissenschaftliche Zeitschriften in szientometrischer Analyse (2002) 0.02
    0.024327088 = product of:
      0.03649063 = sum of:
        0.029649295 = weight(_text_:m in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029649295 = score(doc=1075,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.3333438 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
        0.006841334 = product of:
          0.03420667 = sum of:
            0.03420667 = weight(_text_:29 in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03420667 = score(doc=1075,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12573336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    23. 8.2002 11:51:29
  11. Nicholas, D.; Ritchie, M.: Literature and bibliometrics (1978) 0.02
    0.02305576 = product of:
      0.06916728 = sum of:
        0.06916728 = weight(_text_:m in 1081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06916728 = score(doc=1081,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.7776402 = fieldWeight in 1081, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1081)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Type
    m
  12. Liu, M.; Bu, Y.; Chen, C.; Xu, J.; Li, D.; Leng, Y.; Freeman, R.B.; Meyer, E.T.; Yoon, W.; Sung, M.; Jeong, M.; Lee, J.; Kang, J.; Min, C.; Zhai, Y.; Song, M.; Ding, Y.: Pandemics are catalysts of scientific novelty : evidence from COVID-19 (2022) 0.02
    0.019560663 = product of:
      0.029340994 = sum of:
        0.024454325 = weight(_text_:m in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024454325 = score(doc=633,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
        0.0048866677 = product of:
          0.024433337 = sum of:
            0.024433337 = weight(_text_:29 in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024433337 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12573336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Scientific novelty drives the efforts to invent new vaccines and solutions during the pandemic. First-time collaboration and international collaboration are two pivotal channels to expand teams' search activities for a broader scope of resources required to address the global challenge, which might facilitate the generation of novel ideas. Our analysis of 98,981 coronavirus papers suggests that scientific novelty measured by the BioBERT model that is pretrained on 29 million PubMed articles, and first-time collaboration increased after the outbreak of COVID-19, and international collaboration witnessed a sudden decrease. During COVID-19, papers with more first-time collaboration were found to be more novel and international collaboration did not hamper novelty as it had done in the normal periods. The findings suggest the necessity of reaching out for distant resources and the importance of maintaining a collaborative scientific community beyond nationalism during a pandemic.
  13. Chung, Y.-K.: Bradford distribution and core authors in classification systems literature (1994) 0.02
    0.018254753 = product of:
      0.027382128 = sum of:
        0.01956346 = weight(_text_:m in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01956346 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
        0.007818668 = product of:
          0.039093338 = sum of:
            0.039093338 = weight(_text_:29 in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039093338 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12573336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Bradford's law of scatter was applied to the analysis of the authors of source documents on the subject of classification schemes, published in core periodicals over the period 1981-1990. Results indicated that: core authors of the international classification system literature are Library of Congress, M. Dewey, S. Ranganathan, J. Comaroni, A. Neelameghan, L. Chan and K. Markey; the highly cited authors are linked either to the developers of the classification schemes or to a research centre, or else they authored the most frequently cited books; and the data conforms to Bradford's Law of Scatter
    Source
    Scientometrics. 29(1994) no.2, S.253-269
  14. Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005) 0.02
    0.018254753 = product of:
      0.027382128 = sum of:
        0.01956346 = weight(_text_:m in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01956346 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
        0.007818668 = product of:
          0.039093338 = sum of:
            0.039093338 = weight(_text_:29 in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039093338 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12573336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    27.12.2007 17:16:29
  15. Schreiber, M.: Revisiting the g-index : the average number of citations in the g-core (2009) 0.02
    0.018254753 = product of:
      0.027382128 = sum of:
        0.01956346 = weight(_text_:m in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01956346 = score(doc=3313,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
        0.007818668 = product of:
          0.039093338 = sum of:
            0.039093338 = weight(_text_:29 in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039093338 = score(doc=3313,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12573336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    4. 2.2010 20:56:29
  16. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.02
    0.018207863 = product of:
      0.027311794 = sum of:
        0.01956346 = weight(_text_:m in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01956346 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
        0.0077483333 = product of:
          0.038741667 = sum of:
            0.038741667 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038741667 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12516655 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  17. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.02
    0.018207863 = product of:
      0.027311794 = sum of:
        0.01956346 = weight(_text_:m in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01956346 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
        0.0077483333 = product of:
          0.038741667 = sum of:
            0.038741667 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038741667 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12516655 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
    Type
    m
  18. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02
    0.0181615 = product of:
      0.054484498 = sum of:
        0.054484498 = product of:
          0.13621125 = sum of:
            0.06841334 = weight(_text_:29 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06841334 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12573336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
            0.067797914 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067797914 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12516655 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  19. Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009) 0.02
    0.017707624 = product of:
      0.026561433 = sum of:
        0.020750184 = weight(_text_:m in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020750184 = score(doc=2751,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
        0.00581125 = product of:
          0.02905625 = sum of:
            0.02905625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02905625 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12516655 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:05:07
  20. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.02
    0.017707624 = product of:
      0.026561433 = sum of:
        0.020750184 = weight(_text_:m in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020750184 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08894509 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035743188 = queryNorm
            0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
        0.00581125 = product of:
          0.02905625 = sum of:
            0.02905625 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02905625 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12516655 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035743188 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).

Languages

Types

  • a 438
  • m 25
  • el 11
  • s 5
  • b 2
  • r 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…