Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Isaac, A."
  1. Freire, N.; Charles, V.; Isaac, A.: Subject information and multilingualism in European bibliographic datasets : experiences with Universal Decimal Classification (2015) 0.03
    0.029496435 = product of:
      0.05899287 = sum of:
        0.05899287 = product of:
          0.11798574 = sum of:
            0.11798574 = weight(_text_:v in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11798574 = score(doc=2289,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044999957 = queryNorm
                0.5382217 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Manguinhas, H.; Charles, V.; Isaac, A.; Miles, T.; Lima, A.; Neroulidis, A.; Ginouves, V.; Atsidis, D.; Hildebrand, M.; Brinkerink, M.; Gordea, S.: Linking subject labels in cultural heritage metadata to MIMO vocabulary using CultuurLink (2016) 0.03
    0.025028555 = product of:
      0.05005711 = sum of:
        0.05005711 = product of:
          0.10011422 = sum of:
            0.10011422 = weight(_text_:v in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10011422 = score(doc=3107,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044999957 = queryNorm
                0.45669627 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Isaac, A.: After EDLproject : controlled Vocabularies in TELPlus (2007) 0.02
    0.018290618 = product of:
      0.036581237 = sum of:
        0.036581237 = product of:
          0.073162474 = sum of:
            0.073162474 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073162474 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15758218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044999957 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  4. Hennicke, S.; Olensky, M.; Boer, V. de; Isaac, A.; Wielemaker, J.: ¬A data model for cross-domain data representation : the "Europeana Data Model" in the case of archival and museum data (2010) 0.02
    0.01769786 = product of:
      0.03539572 = sum of:
        0.03539572 = product of:
          0.07079144 = sum of:
            0.07079144 = weight(_text_:v in 4664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07079144 = score(doc=4664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044999957 = queryNorm
                0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 4664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Boer, V. de; Wielemaker, J.; Gent, J. van; Hildebrand, M.; Isaac, A.; Ossenbruggen, J. van; Schreiber, G.: Supporting linked data production for cultural heritage institutes : the Amsterdam Museum case study (2012) 0.01
    0.014748218 = product of:
      0.029496435 = sum of:
        0.029496435 = product of:
          0.05899287 = sum of:
            0.05899287 = weight(_text_:v in 265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05899287 = score(doc=265,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044999957 = queryNorm
                0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 265, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=265)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Wallis, R.; Isaac, A.; Charles, V.; Manguinhas, H.: Recommendations for the application of Schema.org to aggregated cultural heritage metadata to increase relevance and visibility to search engines : the case of Europeana (2017) 0.01
    0.014748218 = product of:
      0.029496435 = sum of:
        0.029496435 = product of:
          0.05899287 = sum of:
            0.05899287 = weight(_text_:v in 3372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05899287 = score(doc=3372,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044999957 = queryNorm
                0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 3372, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3372)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Summers, E.; Isaac, A.; Redding, C.; Krech, D.: LCSH, SKOS and Linked Data (2008) 0.01
    0.010669528 = product of:
      0.021339055 = sum of:
        0.021339055 = product of:
          0.04267811 = sum of:
            0.04267811 = weight(_text_:22 in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04267811 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15758218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044999957 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  8. Isaac, A.: Aligning thesauri for an integrated access to Cultural Heritage Resources (2007) 0.01
    0.010323753 = product of:
      0.020647505 = sum of:
        0.020647505 = product of:
          0.04129501 = sum of:
            0.04129501 = weight(_text_:v in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04129501 = score(doc=553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044999957 = queryNorm
                0.1883776 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Currently, a number of efforts are being carried out to integrate collections from different institutions and containing heterogeneous material. Examples of such projects are The European Library [1] and the Memory of the Netherlands [2]. A crucial point for the success of these is the availability to provide a unified access on top of the different collections, e.g. using one single vocabulary for querying or browsing the objects they contain. This is made difficult by the fact that the objects from different collections are often described using different vocabularies - thesauri, classification schemes - and are therefore not interoperable at the semantic level. To solve this problem, one can turn to semantic links - mappings - between the elements of the different vocabularies. If one knows that a concept C from a vocabulary V is semantically equivalent to a concept to a concept D from vocabulary W, then an appropriate search engine can return all the objects that were indexed against D for a query for objects described using C. We thus have an access to other collections, using a single one vocabulary. This is however an ideal situation, and hard alignment work is required to reach it. Several projects in the past have tried to implement such a solution, like MACS [3] and Renardus [4]. They have demonstrated very interesting results, but also highlighted the difficulty of aligning manually all the different vocabularies involved in practical cases, which sometimes contain hundreds of thousands of concepts. To alleviate this problem, a number of tools have been proposed in order to provide with candidate mappings between two input vocabularies, making alignment a (semi-) automatic task. Recently, the Semantic Web community has produced a lot of these alignment tools'. Several techniques are found, depending on the material they exploit: labels of concepts, structure of vocabularies, collection objects and external knowledge sources. Throughout our presentation, we will present a concrete heterogeneity case where alignment techniques have been applied to build a (pilot) browser, developed in the context of the STITCH project [5]. This browser enables a unified access to two collections of illuminated manuscripts, using the description vocabulary used in the first collection, Mandragore [6], or the one used by the second, Iconclass [7]. In our talk, we will also make the point for using unified representations the vocabulary semantic and lexical information. Additionally to ease the use of the alignment tools that have these vocabularies as input, turning to a standard representation format helps designing applications that are more generic, like the browser we demonstrate. We give pointers to SKOS [8], an open and web-enabled format currently developed by the Semantic Web community.