Zhang, J.: Archival context, digital content, and the ethics of digital archival representation : the ethics of identification in digital library metadata (2012)
0.01
0.014748218 = product of:
0.029496435 = sum of:
0.029496435 = product of:
0.05899287 = sum of:
0.05899287 = weight(_text_:v in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05899287 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.219214 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044999957 = queryNorm
0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The findings of a recent study on digital archival representation raise some ethical concerns about how digital archival materials are organized, described, and made available for use on the Web. Archivists have a fundamental obligation to preserve and protect the authenticity and integrity of records in their holdings and, at the same time, have the responsibility to promote the use of records as a fundamental purpose of the keeping of archives (SAA 2005 Code of Ethics for Archivists V & VI). Is it an ethical practice that digital content in digital archives is deeply embedded in its contextual structure and generally underrepresented in digital archival systems? Similarly, is it ethical for archivists to detach digital items from their archival context in order to make them more "digital friendly" and more accessible to meet needs of some users? Do archivists have an obligation to bring the two representation systems together so that the context and content of digital archives can be better represented and archival materials "can be located and used by anyone, for any purpose, while still remaining authentic evidence of the work and life of the creator"? (Millar 2010, 157) This paper discusses the findings of the study and their ethical implications relating to digital archival description and representation.
