Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.008746384 = product of:
  0.017492767 = sum of:
    0.017492767 = product of:
      0.052478302 = sum of:
        0.052478302 = weight(_text_:h in 454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052478302 = score(doc=454,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 454, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=454)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

h-index

0.0071413927 = product of:
  0.014282785 = sum of:
    0.014282785 = product of:
      0.042848356 = sum of:
        0.042848356 = weight(_text_:h in 2350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042848356 = score(doc=2350,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.38035205 = fieldWeight in 2350, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2350)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

I discuss how, given a certain number of articles and citations of these articles, the h-index and the g-index are affected by the level of concentration of the citations. This offers the opportunity for a comparison between these 2 indices from a new perspective.

Object

h-index