Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01
    0.008191286 = product of:
      0.016382571 = sum of:
        0.016382571 = product of:
          0.049147714 = sum of:
            0.049147714 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049147714 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  2. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.01
    0.0061434647 = product of:
      0.012286929 = sum of:
        0.012286929 = product of:
          0.036860786 = sum of:
            0.036860786 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036860786 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  3. Wainer, J.; Valle, E.: What happens to computer science research after it is published? : Tracking CS research lines (2013) 0.01
    0.005901199 = product of:
      0.011802398 = sum of:
        0.011802398 = product of:
          0.035407193 = sum of:
            0.035407193 = weight(_text_:j in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035407193 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Ardanuy, J.: Sixty years of citation analysis studies in the humanities (1951-2010) (2013) 0.01
    0.0050581703 = product of:
      0.010116341 = sum of:
        0.010116341 = product of:
          0.030349022 = sum of:
            0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030349022 = score(doc=1015,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Gorraiz, J.; Purnell, P.J.; Glänzel, W.: Opportunities for and limitations of the Book Citation Index (2013) 0.00
    0.0042151418 = product of:
      0.0084302835 = sum of:
        0.0084302835 = product of:
          0.02529085 = sum of:
            0.02529085 = weight(_text_:j in 966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02529085 = score(doc=966,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 966, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=966)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Klitzing, N.; Hoekstra, R.; Strijbos, J.-W,: Literature practices : processes leading up to a citation (2019) 0.00
    0.0042151418 = product of:
      0.0084302835 = sum of:
        0.0084302835 = product of:
          0.02529085 = sum of:
            0.02529085 = weight(_text_:j in 4628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02529085 = score(doc=4628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4628)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Boyack, K.W.; Small, H.; Klavans, R.: Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text (2013) 0.00
    0.0030923137 = product of:
      0.0061846273 = sum of:
        0.0061846273 = product of:
          0.018553881 = sum of:
            0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 1036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018553881 = score(doc=1036,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1036, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1036)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Cardona, M.: Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods (2010) 0.00
    0.0025769281 = product of:
      0.0051538562 = sum of:
        0.0051538562 = product of:
          0.015461569 = sum of:
            0.015461569 = weight(_text_:h in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015461569 = score(doc=3998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this study, reference standards and reference multipliers are suggested as a means to compare the citation impact of earlier research publications in physics (from the period of "Little Science" in the early 20th century) with that of contemporary papers (from the period of "Big Science," beginning around 1960). For the development of time-specific reference standards, the authors determined (a) the mean citation rates of papers in selected physics journals as well as (b) the mean citation rates of all papers in physics published in 1900 (Little Science) and in 2000 (Big Science); this was accomplished by relying on the processes of field-specific standardization in bibliometry. For the sake of developing reference multipliers with which the citation impact of earlier papers can be adjusted to the citation impact of contemporary papers, they combined the reference standards calculated for 1900 and 2000 into their ratio. The use of reference multipliers is demonstrated by means of two examples involving the time adjusted h index values for Max Planck and Albert Einstein.