Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.06 
    0.059742056 = product of:
  0.11948411 = sum of:
    0.11948411 = product of:
      0.17922616 = sum of:
        0.080930725 = weight(_text_:j in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080930725 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
        0.09829543 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09829543 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  2. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.03 
    0.028649917 = product of:
  0.057299834 = sum of:
    0.057299834 = product of:
      0.08594975 = sum of:
        0.04908896 = weight(_text_:h in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04908896 = score(doc=590,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.435748 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
        0.036860786 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036860786 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
    Object
    H-Index
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.1, S.124-125
  3. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.02 
    0.02240327 = product of:
  0.04480654 = sum of:
    0.04480654 = product of:
      0.06720981 = sum of:
        0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030349022 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
        0.036860786 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036860786 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  4. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.02 
    0.018471558 = product of:
  0.036943115 = sum of:
    0.036943115 = product of:
      0.05541467 = sum of:
        0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018553881 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
        0.036860786 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036860786 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  5. Gorraiz, J.; Schlögl, C.: Zusammenhang von Zeitschriftennachfrage und -zitationshäufigkeiten : ¬Eine bibliometrische Analyse eines Dokumentlieferdienstes am Beispiel von Subito (2003) 0.02 
    0.016300969 = product of:
  0.032601938 = sum of:
    0.032601938 = product of:
      0.048902903 = sum of:
        0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018553881 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
        0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030349022 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 50(2003) H.3, S.131-140
  6. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.02 
    0.015392965 = product of:
  0.03078593 = sum of:
    0.03078593 = product of:
      0.046178892 = sum of:
        0.015461569 = weight(_text_:h in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015461569 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
        0.030717323 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030717323 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.2, S.14-20
  7. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01 
    0.014480284 = product of:
  0.028960569 = sum of:
    0.028960569 = product of:
      0.086881705 = sum of:
        0.086881705 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086881705 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  8. Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002) 0.01 
    0.011681344 = product of:
  0.023362689 = sum of:
    0.023362689 = product of:
      0.070088066 = sum of:
        0.070088066 = weight(_text_:j in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070088066 = score(doc=3765,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.48645282 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.
  9. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.01 
    0.010867313 = product of:
  0.021734625 = sum of:
    0.021734625 = product of:
      0.032601938 = sum of:
        0.012369255 = weight(_text_:h in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012369255 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
        0.020232681 = weight(_text_:j in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020232681 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
  10. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.008688171 = product of:
  0.017376343 = sum of:
    0.017376343 = product of:
      0.052129027 = sum of:
        0.052129027 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052129027 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  11. Small, H.; Sweeney, E.: Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations (1985) 0.01 
    0.00824617 = product of:
  0.01649234 = sum of:
    0.01649234 = product of:
      0.04947702 = sum of:
        0.04947702 = weight(_text_:h in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04947702 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Pudovkin, A.I.; Garfield, E.: Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals (2002) 0.01 
    0.00730084 = product of:
  0.01460168 = sum of:
    0.01460168 = product of:
      0.04380504 = sum of:
        0.04380504 = weight(_text_:j in 5220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04380504 = score(doc=5220,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.304033 = fieldWeight in 5220, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5220)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Journal Citation Reports provides a classification of journals most heavily cited by a given journal and which most heavily cite that journal, but size variation is not taken into account. Pudovkin and Garfield suggest a procedure for meeting this difficulty. The relatedness of journal i to journal j is determined by the number of citations from journal i to journal j in a given year normalized by the product of the papers published in the j journal in that year times the number of references cited in the i journal in that year. A multiplier of ten to the sixth is suggested to bring the values into an easily perceptible range. While citations received depend upon the overall cumulative number of papers published by a journal, the current year is utilized since that data is available in JCR. Citations to current year papers would be quite low in most fields and thus not included. To produce the final index, the maximum of the A citing B value, and the B citing A value is chosen and used to indicate the closeness of the journals. The procedure is illustrated for the journal Genetics.
  13. Zitatenanalyse und verwandte Verfahren : Vorträge einer öffentlichen Sitzung während der 32. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation, Oktober 1979 (1980) 0.01 
    0.0072886534 = product of:
  0.014577307 = sum of:
    0.014577307 = product of:
      0.04373192 = sum of:
        0.04373192 = weight(_text_:h in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04373192 = score(doc=417,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: NACKE, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne; GERDEL, W.: Datentechnische Methoden in der Referenzanalyse; EISENHARDT, O.-H.: Ergebnisse der Referenzanalyse; KRUG, G.: List-Analyse; LANGE, H.: Requestanalyse; HENZLER, R.G.: Bibliometrische Methoden der Termanalyse; NACKE, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse
  14. Hauffe, H.: ¬The role of citation analysis in the history and evaluation of science : Bericht über einen Vortrag von Eugene Garfield (Wien, 26. Mai 2004) (2004) 0.01 
    0.0072886534 = product of:
  0.014577307 = sum of:
    0.014577307 = product of:
      0.04373192 = sum of:
        0.04373192 = weight(_text_:h in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04373192 = score(doc=2492,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.7-9 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]
  15. Nacke, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne (1980) 0.01 
    0.0061846273 = product of:
  0.012369255 = sum of:
    0.012369255 = product of:
      0.037107762 = sum of:
        0.037107762 = weight(_text_:h in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037107762 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  16. Nacke, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse (1980) 0.01 
    0.0061846273 = product of:
  0.012369255 = sum of:
    0.012369255 = product of:
      0.037107762 = sum of:
        0.037107762 = weight(_text_:h in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037107762 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  17. Stock, W.G.: Eugene Garfield und die Folgen : der Weg der Fußnote bis in die Wissenschaftspolitik (2002) 0.01 
    0.0061846273 = product of:
  0.012369255 = sum of:
    0.012369255 = product of:
      0.037107762 = sum of:
        0.037107762 = weight(_text_:h in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037107762 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.3, S.14-19
  18. Glänzel, W.: Visual bibliometrics : eine visuelle Oberfläche zur Erweiterung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten bibliographischer Datenbanken (1996) 0.01 
    0.005901199 = product of:
  0.011802398 = sum of:
    0.011802398 = product of:
      0.035407193 = sum of:
        0.035407193 = weight(_text_:j in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035407193 = score(doc=6110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Herausforderungen an die Informationswirtschaft: Informationsverdichtung, Informationsbewertung und Datenvisualisierung. Proceedings des 5. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'96), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 17.-19. Oktober 1996. Hrsg.: J. Krause u.a
  19. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsevaluation mittels Datenbanken : methodisch einwandfrei? (1995) 0.01 
    0.0051538562 = product of:
  0.0103077125 = sum of:
    0.0103077125 = product of:
      0.030923137 = sum of:
        0.030923137 = weight(_text_:h in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030923137 = score(doc=2443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 1995, H.11, S.118-121
  20. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.01 
    0.0051538562 = product of:
  0.0103077125 = sum of:
    0.0103077125 = product of:
      0.030923137 = sum of:
        0.030923137 = weight(_text_:h in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030923137 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04534384 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.1, S.45-46 (M.J. López Huertas u. E. Jiménez-Contreras); Password 2002, H.3, S.14-19 (W.G. Stock)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 25
  • d 16

Types

  • a 38
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications