-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Levene, M.: ¬The hw-rank : an h-index variant for ranking web pages (2015)
0.03
0.02716828 = product of:
0.05433656 = sum of:
0.05433656 = product of:
0.08150484 = sum of:
0.030923137 = weight(_text_:h in 1694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030923137 = score(doc=1694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1694)
0.0505817 = weight(_text_:j in 1694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0505817 = score(doc=1694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1694)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ding, Y.; Yan, E.; Frazho, A.; Caverlee, J.: PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks (2009)
0.02
0.018862724 = product of:
0.03772545 = sum of:
0.03772545 = product of:
0.056588173 = sum of:
0.026239151 = weight(_text_:h in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026239151 = score(doc=3161,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030349022 = score(doc=3161,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper studies how varied damping factors in the PageRank algorithm influence the ranking of authors and proposes weighted PageRank algorithms. We selected the 108 most highly cited authors in the information retrieval (IR) area from the 1970s to 2008 to form the author co-citation network. We calculated the ranks of these 108 authors based on PageRank with the damping factor ranging from 0.05 to 0.95. In order to test the relationship between different measures, we compared PageRank and weighted PageRank results with the citation ranking, h-index, and centrality measures. We found that in our author co-citation network, citation rank is highly correlated with PageRank with different damping factors and also with different weighted PageRank algorithms; citation rank and PageRank are not significantly correlated with centrality measures; and h-index rank does not significantly correlate with centrality measures but does significantly correlate with other measures. The key factors that have impact on the PageRank of authors in the author co-citation network are being co-cited with important authors.
-
Karlsson, A.; Hammarfelt, B.; Steinhauer, H.J.; Falkman, G.; Olson, N.; Nelhans, G.; Nolin, J.: Modeling uncertainty in bibliometrics and information retrieval : an information fusion approach (2015)
0.01
0.0084302835 = product of:
0.016860567 = sum of:
0.016860567 = product of:
0.0505817 = sum of:
0.0505817 = weight(_text_:j in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0505817 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.01
0.008191286 = product of:
0.016382571 = sum of:
0.016382571 = product of:
0.049147714 = sum of:
0.049147714 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049147714 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Jacso, P.: Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster (2008)
0.01
0.006312159 = product of:
0.012624318 = sum of:
0.012624318 = product of:
0.03787295 = sum of:
0.03787295 = weight(_text_:h in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03787295 = score(doc=5586,freq=12.0), product of:
0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.3361869 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper focuses on the practical limitations in the content and software of the databases that are used to calculate the h-index for assessing the publishing productivity and impact of researchers. To celebrate F. W. Lancaster's biological age of seventy-five, and "scientific age" of forty-five, this paper discusses the related features of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS), and demonstrates in the latter how a much more realistic and fair h-index can be computed for F. W. Lancaster than the one produced automatically. Browsing and searching the cited reference index of the 1945-2007 edition of WoS, which in my estimate has over a hundred million "orphan references" that have no counterpart master records to be attached to, and "stray references" that cite papers which do have master records but cannot be identified by the matching algorithm because of errors of omission and commission in the references of the citing works, can bring up hundreds of additional cited references given to works of an accomplished author but are ignored in the automatic process of calculating the h-index. The partially manual process doubled the h-index value for F. W. Lancaster from 13 to 26, which is a much more realistic value for an information scientist and professor of his stature.
- Object
- h-index
-
White, H. D.: Co-cited author retrieval and relevance theory : examples from the humanities (2015)
0.01
0.0061846273 = product of:
0.012369255 = sum of:
0.012369255 = product of:
0.037107762 = sum of:
0.037107762 = weight(_text_:h in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037107762 = score(doc=1687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Li, J.; Willett, P.: ArticleRank : a PageRank-based alternative to numbers of citations for analysing citation networks (2009)
0.00
0.0042151418 = product of:
0.0084302835 = sum of:
0.0084302835 = product of:
0.02529085 = sum of:
0.02529085 = weight(_text_:j in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02529085 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wiggers, G.; Verberne, S.; Loon, W. van; Zwenne, G.-J.: Bibliometric-enhanced legal information retrieval : combining usage and citations as flavors of impact relevance (2023)
0.00
0.0042151418 = product of:
0.0084302835 = sum of:
0.0084302835 = product of:
0.02529085 = sum of:
0.02529085 = weight(_text_:j in 1022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02529085 = score(doc=1022,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1022, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1022)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Mayr, P.: Bradfordizing als Re-Ranking-Ansatz in Literaturinformationssystemen (2011)
0.00
0.0030923137 = product of:
0.0061846273 = sum of:
0.0061846273 = product of:
0.018553881 = sum of:
0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018553881 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.1, S.3-10
-
Mayr, P.: Bradfordizing mit Katalogdaten : Alternative Sicht auf Suchergebnisse und Publikationsquellen durch Re-Ranking (2010)
0.00
0.0030923137 = product of:
0.0061846273 = sum of:
0.0061846273 = product of:
0.018553881 = sum of:
0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018553881 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- BuB. 62(2010) H.1, S.61-63
