-
Oberhauser, O.; Labner, J.: Relevance Ranking in Online-Katalogen : Informationsstand und Perspektiven (2003)
0.02
0.019017797 = product of:
0.038035594 = sum of:
0.038035594 = product of:
0.057053387 = sum of:
0.021646196 = weight(_text_:h in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021646196 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.035407193 = weight(_text_:j in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035407193 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 56(2003) H.3/4, S.49-63
-
Maylein, L.; Langenstein, A.: Neues vom Relevanz-Ranking im HEIDI-Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg : Perspektiven für bibliothekarische Dienstleistungen (2013)
0.00
0.004123085 = product of:
0.00824617 = sum of:
0.00824617 = product of:
0.02473851 = sum of:
0.02473851 = weight(_text_:h in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02473851 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 16(2013) H.3, S.190-200
-
Hora, M.: Methoden für das Ranking in Discovery-Systemen (2018)
0.00
0.0036076994 = product of:
0.007215399 = sum of:
0.007215399 = product of:
0.021646196 = sum of:
0.021646196 = weight(_text_:h in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021646196 = score(doc=4968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Perspektive Bibliothek. 7(2018) H.2, S.2-23
-
Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004)
0.00
0.0035836874 = product of:
0.0071673747 = sum of:
0.0071673747 = product of:
0.021502124 = sum of:
0.021502124 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021502124 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
-
Oberhauser, O.: Relevance Ranking in den Online-Katalogen der "nächsten Generation" (2010)
0.00
0.0030923137 = product of:
0.0061846273 = sum of:
0.0061846273 = product of:
0.018553881 = sum of:
0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018553881 = score(doc=4308,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04534384 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 63(2010) H.1/2, S.25-37