Search (58 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.05
    0.052274298 = product of:
      0.104548596 = sum of:
        0.104548596 = product of:
          0.15682289 = sum of:
            0.070814386 = weight(_text_:j in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070814386 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
            0.0860085 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0860085 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  2. Na, S.-H.; Kang, I.-S.; Roh, J.-E.; Lee, J.-H.: ¬An empirical study of query expansion and cluster-based retrieval in language modeling approach (2007) 0.03
    0.026895225 = product of:
      0.05379045 = sum of:
        0.05379045 = product of:
          0.080685675 = sum of:
            0.030612344 = weight(_text_:h in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030612344 = score(doc=906,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
            0.05007333 = weight(_text_:j in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05007333 = score(doc=906,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.34753868 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003) 0.02
    0.02240327 = product of:
      0.04480654 = sum of:
        0.04480654 = product of:
          0.06720981 = sum of:
            0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030349022 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
            0.036860786 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036860786 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 9.2004 17:32:22
  4. Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005) 0.02
    0.021550149 = product of:
      0.043100297 = sum of:
        0.043100297 = product of:
          0.064650446 = sum of:
            0.021646196 = weight(_text_:h in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021646196 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
            0.04300425 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04300425 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 3.2005 16:23:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.2, S.87-92
  5. Oberhauser, O.; Labner, J.: Relevance Ranking in Online-Katalogen : Informationsstand und Perspektiven (2003) 0.02
    0.019017797 = product of:
      0.038035594 = sum of:
        0.038035594 = product of:
          0.057053387 = sum of:
            0.021646196 = weight(_text_:h in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021646196 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
            0.035407193 = weight(_text_:j in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035407193 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 56(2003) H.3/4, S.49-63
  6. Ding, Y.; Yan, E.; Frazho, A.; Caverlee, J.: PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks (2009) 0.02
    0.018862724 = product of:
      0.03772545 = sum of:
        0.03772545 = product of:
          0.056588173 = sum of:
            0.026239151 = weight(_text_:h in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026239151 = score(doc=3161,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
            0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030349022 = score(doc=3161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper studies how varied damping factors in the PageRank algorithm influence the ranking of authors and proposes weighted PageRank algorithms. We selected the 108 most highly cited authors in the information retrieval (IR) area from the 1970s to 2008 to form the author co-citation network. We calculated the ranks of these 108 authors based on PageRank with the damping factor ranging from 0.05 to 0.95. In order to test the relationship between different measures, we compared PageRank and weighted PageRank results with the citation ranking, h-index, and centrality measures. We found that in our author co-citation network, citation rank is highly correlated with PageRank with different damping factors and also with different weighted PageRank algorithms; citation rank and PageRank are not significantly correlated with centrality measures; and h-index rank does not significantly correlate with centrality measures but does significantly correlate with other measures. The key factors that have impact on the PageRank of authors in the author co-citation network are being co-cited with important authors.
  7. Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004) 0.02
    0.018471558 = product of:
      0.036943115 = sum of:
        0.036943115 = product of:
          0.05541467 = sum of:
            0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018553881 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
            0.036860786 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036860786 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 5.2004 19:22:06
  8. Daniowicz, C.; Baliski, J.: Document ranking based upon Markov chains (2001) 0.01
    0.011802398 = product of:
      0.023604795 = sum of:
        0.023604795 = product of:
          0.070814386 = sum of:
            0.070814386 = weight(_text_:j in 5388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070814386 = score(doc=5388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 5388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Ackermann, J.: Knuth-Morris-Pratt (2005) 0.01
    0.010867313 = product of:
      0.021734625 = sum of:
        0.021734625 = product of:
          0.032601938 = sum of:
            0.012369255 = weight(_text_:h in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012369255 = score(doc=865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
            0.020232681 = weight(_text_:j in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020232681 = score(doc=865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des Seminars Suchmaschinen und Suchalgorithmen beschäftigt sich diese Arbeit mit dem Auffinden bestimmter Wörter oder Muster in Texten. Der Begriff "Text" wird hier in einem sehr allgemeinen Sinne als strukturierte Folge beliebiger Länge von Zeichen aus einem endlichen Alphabet verstanden. Somit fällt unter diesen Bereich ganz allgemein die Suche nach einem Muster in einer Sequenz von Zeichen. Beispiele hierfür sind neben der Suche von Wörtern in "literarischen" Texten, z.B. das Finden von Pixelfolgen in Bildern oder gar das Finden von Mustern in DNS-Strängen. Das Anwendungsgebiet für eine solche Suche ist weit gefächert. Man denke hier allein an Texteditoren, Literaturdatenbanken, digitale Lexika oder die besagte DNADatenbank. Betrachtet man allein das 1989 publizierte Oxford English Dictionary mit seinen etwa 616500 definierten Stichworten auf gedruckten 21728 Seiten, so gilt es, einen möglichst effizienten Algorithmus für die Suche in Texten zu nutzen. Der in der Arbeit zugrunde liegende Datentyp ist vom Typ String (Zeichenkette), wobei hier offen gelassen wird, wie der Datentyp programmtechnisch realisiert wird. Algorithmen zur Verarbeitung von Zeichenketten (string processing) umfassen ein bestimmtes Spektrum an Anwendungsgebieten [Ot96, S.617 f.], wie z.B. das Komprimieren, das Verschlüssen, das Analysieren (parsen), das Übersetzen von Texten sowie das Suchen in Texten, welches Thema dieses Seminars ist. Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit wird der Knuth-Morris-Pratt Algorithmus vorgestellt, der wie der ebenfalls in diesem Seminar vorgestellte Boyer-Moore Algorithmus einen effizienten Suchalgorithmus darstellt. Dabei soll ein gegebenes Suchwort oder Muster (pattern) in einer gegeben Zeichenkette erkannt werden (pattern matching). Gesucht werden dabei ein oder mehrere Vorkommen eines bestimmten Suchwortes (exact pattern matching). Der Knuth-Morris-Pratt Algorithmus wurde erstmals 1974 als Institutbericht der Stanford University beschrieben und erschien 1977 in der Fachzeitschrift Journal of Computing unter dem Titel "Fast Pattern Matching in Strings" [Kn77]. Der Algorithmus beschreibt eine Suche in Zeichenketten mit linearer Laufzeit. Der Name des Algorithmus setzt sich aus den Entwicklern des Algorithmus Donald E. Knuth, James H. Morris und Vaughan R. Pratt zusammen.
  10. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.008191286 = product of:
      0.016382571 = sum of:
        0.016382571 = product of:
          0.049147714 = sum of:
            0.049147714 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049147714 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  11. Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003) 0.01
    0.008191286 = product of:
      0.016382571 = sum of:
        0.016382571 = product of:
          0.049147714 = sum of:
            0.049147714 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049147714 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:23
  12. Dreßler, H.: Fuzzy Information Retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.0072886534 = product of:
      0.014577307 = sum of:
        0.014577307 = product of:
          0.04373192 = sum of:
            0.04373192 = weight(_text_:h in 2300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04373192 = score(doc=2300,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 2300, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2300)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.6/7, S.351-352
  13. Hubert, G.; Mothe, J.: ¬An adaptable search engine for multimodal information retrieval (2009) 0.01
    0.0067442274 = product of:
      0.013488455 = sum of:
        0.013488455 = product of:
          0.040465362 = sum of:
            0.040465362 = weight(_text_:j in 2951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040465362 = score(doc=2951,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2951, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2951)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Jacso, P.: Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster (2008) 0.01
    0.006312159 = product of:
      0.012624318 = sum of:
        0.012624318 = product of:
          0.03787295 = sum of:
            0.03787295 = weight(_text_:h in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03787295 = score(doc=5586,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.3361869 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper focuses on the practical limitations in the content and software of the databases that are used to calculate the h-index for assessing the publishing productivity and impact of researchers. To celebrate F. W. Lancaster's biological age of seventy-five, and "scientific age" of forty-five, this paper discusses the related features of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS), and demonstrates in the latter how a much more realistic and fair h-index can be computed for F. W. Lancaster than the one produced automatically. Browsing and searching the cited reference index of the 1945-2007 edition of WoS, which in my estimate has over a hundred million "orphan references" that have no counterpart master records to be attached to, and "stray references" that cite papers which do have master records but cannot be identified by the matching algorithm because of errors of omission and commission in the references of the citing works, can bring up hundreds of additional cited references given to works of an accomplished author but are ignored in the automatic process of calculating the h-index. The partially manual process doubled the h-index value for F. W. Lancaster from 13 to 26, which is a much more realistic value for an information scientist and professor of his stature.
    Object
    h-index
  15. Crestani, F.; Dominich, S.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J.K. van: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval : an introduction to the special issue (2003) 0.01
    0.0061434647 = product of:
      0.012286929 = sum of:
        0.012286929 = product of:
          0.036860786 = sum of:
            0.036860786 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036860786 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:27:36
  16. Witschel, H.F.: Global term weights in distributed environments (2008) 0.01
    0.0061434647 = product of:
      0.012286929 = sum of:
        0.012286929 = product of:
          0.036860786 = sum of:
            0.036860786 = weight(_text_:22 in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036860786 = score(doc=2096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2008 9:44:22
  17. Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004) 0.01
    0.0061434647 = product of:
      0.012286929 = sum of:
        0.012286929 = product of:
          0.036860786 = sum of:
            0.036860786 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036860786 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:22:48
  18. Campos, L.M. de; Fernández-Luna, J.M.; Huete, J.F.: Implementing relevance feedback in the Bayesian network retrieval model (2003) 0.01
    0.0061434647 = product of:
      0.012286929 = sum of:
        0.012286929 = product of:
          0.036860786 = sum of:
            0.036860786 = weight(_text_:22 in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036860786 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:30:19
  19. Picard, J.; Savoy, J.: Enhancing retrieval with hyperlinks : a general model based on propositional argumentation systems (2003) 0.01
    0.005961111 = product of:
      0.011922222 = sum of:
        0.011922222 = product of:
          0.035766665 = sum of:
            0.035766665 = weight(_text_:j in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035766665 = score(doc=1427,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Sormunen, E.; Kekäläinen, J.; Koivisto, J.; Järvelin, K.: Document text characteristics affect the ranking of the most relevant documents by expanded structured queries (2001) 0.01
    0.005961111 = product of:
      0.011922222 = sum of:
        0.011922222 = product of:
          0.035766665 = sum of:
            0.035766665 = weight(_text_:j in 4487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035766665 = score(doc=4487,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 4487, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4487)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Languages

  • e 46
  • d 11
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 53
  • m 4
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…