Search (142 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.09
    0.08998393 = product of:
      0.17996787 = sum of:
        0.17996787 = sum of:
          0.030923137 = weight(_text_:h in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030923137 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04534384 = queryNorm
              0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.08761008 = weight(_text_:j in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08761008 = score(doc=3103,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04534384 = queryNorm
              0.608066 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.061434645 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061434645 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04534384 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  2. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.05
    0.052274298 = product of:
      0.104548596 = sum of:
        0.104548596 = product of:
          0.15682289 = sum of:
            0.070814386 = weight(_text_:j in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070814386 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
            0.0860085 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0860085 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  3. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.04
    0.043100297 = product of:
      0.086200595 = sum of:
        0.086200595 = product of:
          0.12930089 = sum of:
            0.043292392 = weight(_text_:h in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043292392 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
            0.0860085 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0860085 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1983, Göttingen, 3.-7.10.1983: Fachinformation und Bildschirmtext. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  4. Reichert, S.; Mayr, P.: Untersuchung von Relevanzeigenschaften in einem kontrollierten Eyetracking-Experiment (2012) 0.04
    0.042881846 = product of:
      0.08576369 = sum of:
        0.08576369 = sum of:
          0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018553881 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04534384 = queryNorm
              0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
          0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030349022 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04534384 = queryNorm
              0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
          0.036860786 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036860786 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04534384 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2012.63.issue-3/iwp-2012-0029/iwp-2012-0029.xml?format=INT. Vgl. auch: http://www.ib.hu-berlin.de/~mayr/arbeiten/iwp-2012-final.pdf.
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:25:54
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.145-156
  5. Schoger, A.; Frommer, J.: Heterogen - was nun? : Evaluierung heterogener bibliographischer Metadaten (2000) 0.03
    0.032601938 = product of:
      0.065203875 = sum of:
        0.065203875 = product of:
          0.097805806 = sum of:
            0.037107762 = weight(_text_:h in 4465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037107762 = score(doc=4465,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 4465, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4465)
            0.060698044 = weight(_text_:j in 4465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060698044 = score(doc=4465,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 4465, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4465)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 47(2000) H.1, S.110-128
  6. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.03
    0.03078593 = product of:
      0.06157186 = sum of:
        0.06157186 = product of:
          0.092357785 = sum of:
            0.030923137 = weight(_text_:h in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030923137 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
            0.061434645 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061434645 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  7. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.03
    0.030665359 = product of:
      0.061330717 = sum of:
        0.061330717 = product of:
          0.09199607 = sum of:
            0.042848356 = weight(_text_:h in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042848356 = score(doc=261,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.38035205 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
            0.049147714 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049147714 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch den Bericht in: nfd 53(2002) H.2, S.71
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 52(2001) H.7, S.381-392
  8. Hull, D.; Grefenstette, G.; Schulze, B.M.; Gaussier, E.; Schütze, H.; Pedersen, J.: Xerox TREC-5 site reports : routing, filtering, NLP, and Spanisch tracks (1997) 0.03
    0.02716828 = product of:
      0.05433656 = sum of:
        0.05433656 = product of:
          0.08150484 = sum of:
            0.030923137 = weight(_text_:h in 3096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030923137 = score(doc=3096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 3096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3096)
            0.0505817 = weight(_text_:j in 3096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0505817 = score(doc=3096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 3096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3096)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.03
    0.026417308 = product of:
      0.052834615 = sum of:
        0.052834615 = product of:
          0.07925192 = sum of:
            0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018553881 = score(doc=6386,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
            0.060698044 = weight(_text_:j in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060698044 = score(doc=6386,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 52(2001) H.5, S.251-262
  10. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.02
    0.02240327 = product of:
      0.04480654 = sum of:
        0.04480654 = product of:
          0.06720981 = sum of:
            0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030349022 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
            0.036860786 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036860786 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31
    Source
    ASIS'89. Managing information and technology. Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Washington D.C., 30.10.-2.11.1989. Vol.26. Ed.by J. Katzer and G.B. Newby
  11. Turtle, H.; Flood, J.: Query evaluation : strategies and optimizations (1995) 0.02
    0.021734625 = product of:
      0.04346925 = sum of:
        0.04346925 = product of:
          0.065203875 = sum of:
            0.02473851 = weight(_text_:h in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02473851 = score(doc=4087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
            0.040465362 = weight(_text_:j in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040465362 = score(doc=4087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Krause, J.; Womser-Hacker, C.: PADOK-II : Retrievaltests zur Bewertung von Volltextindexierungsvarianten für das deutsche Patentinformationssystem (1990) 0.02
    0.021734625 = product of:
      0.04346925 = sum of:
        0.04346925 = product of:
          0.065203875 = sum of:
            0.02473851 = weight(_text_:h in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02473851 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
            0.040465362 = weight(_text_:j in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040465362 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 41(1990) H.1, S.13-19
  13. Lepsky, K.; Siepmann, J.; Zimmermann, A.: Automatische Indexierung für Online-Kataloge : Ergebnisse eines Retrievaltests (1996) 0.02
    0.019017797 = product of:
      0.038035594 = sum of:
        0.038035594 = product of:
          0.057053387 = sum of:
            0.021646196 = weight(_text_:h in 3251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021646196 = score(doc=3251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 3251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3251)
            0.035407193 = weight(_text_:j in 3251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035407193 = score(doc=3251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 3251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3251)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 43(1996) H.1, S.47-56
  14. Strzalkowski, T.; Guthrie, L.; Karlgren, J.; Leistensnider, J.; Lin, F.; Perez-Carballo, J.; Straszheim, T.; Wang, J.; Wilding, J.: Natural language information retrieval : TREC-5 report (1997) 0.02
    0.018850688 = product of:
      0.037701376 = sum of:
        0.037701376 = product of:
          0.11310413 = sum of:
            0.11310413 = weight(_text_:j in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11310413 = score(doc=3100,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.78500986 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011) 0.02
    0.018669393 = product of:
      0.037338786 = sum of:
        0.037338786 = product of:
          0.056008175 = sum of:
            0.02529085 = weight(_text_:j in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02529085 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
            0.030717323 = weight(_text_:22 in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030717323 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:20:56
  16. Yerbury, H.; Parker, J.: Novice searchers' use of familiar structures in searching bibliographic information retrieval systems (1998) 0.02
    0.016300969 = product of:
      0.032601938 = sum of:
        0.032601938 = product of:
          0.048902903 = sum of:
            0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018553881 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
            0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030349022 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Chen, H.; Martinez, J.; Kirchhoff, A.; Ng, T.D.; Schatz, B.R.: Alleviating search uncertainty through concept associations : automatic indexing, co-occurence analysis, and parallel computing (1998) 0.02
    0.016300969 = product of:
      0.032601938 = sum of:
        0.032601938 = product of:
          0.048902903 = sum of:
            0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018553881 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
            0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030349022 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Oberhauser, O.; Labner, J.: OPAC-Erweiterung durch automatische Indexierung : Empirische Untersuchung mit Daten aus dem Österreichischen Verbundkatalog (2002) 0.02
    0.016300969 = product of:
      0.032601938 = sum of:
        0.032601938 = product of:
          0.048902903 = sum of:
            0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018553881 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
            0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030349022 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ABI-Technik. 23(2003) H.4, S.305-314
  19. Munkelt, J.; Schaer, P.; Lepsky, K.: Towards an IR test collection for the German National Library (2018) 0.02
    0.016300969 = product of:
      0.032601938 = sum of:
        0.032601938 = product of:
          0.048902903 = sum of:
            0.018553881 = weight(_text_:h in 4311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018553881 = score(doc=4311,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4311, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4311)
            0.030349022 = weight(_text_:j in 4311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030349022 = score(doc=4311,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14407988 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4311, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4311)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Automatic content indexing is one of the innovations that are increasingly changing the way libraries work. In theory, it promises a cataloguing service that would hardly be possible with humans in terms of speed, quantity and maybe quality. The German National Library (DNB) has also recognised this potential and is increasingly relying on the automatic indexing of their catalogue content. The DNB took a major step in this direction in 2017, which was announced in two papers. The announcement was rather restrained, but the content of the papers is all the more explosive for the library community: Since September 2017, the DNB has discontinued the intellectual indexing of series Band H and has switched to an automatic process for these series. The subject indexing of online publications (series O) has been purely automatical since 2010; from September 2017, monographs and periodicals published outside the publishing industry and university publications will no longer be indexed by people. This raises the question: What is the quality of the automatic indexing compared to the manual work or in other words to which degree can the automatic indexing replace people without a signi cant drop in regards to quality?
  20. Chu, H.: Factors affecting relevance judgment : a report from TREC Legal track (2011) 0.02
    0.015392965 = product of:
      0.03078593 = sum of:
        0.03078593 = product of:
          0.046178892 = sum of:
            0.015461569 = weight(_text_:h in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015461569 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11265446 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
            0.030717323 = weight(_text_:22 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030717323 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1587864 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04534384 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 7.2011 18:29:22

Languages

  • e 100
  • d 32
  • chi 3
  • nl 3
  • f 2
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 128
  • m 5
  • s 5
  • el 2
  • p 2
  • r 2
  • x 2
  • More… Less…