Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02

0.018536398 = product of:
  0.037072796 = sum of:
    0.037072796 = product of:
      0.07414559 = sum of:
        0.07414559 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07414559 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1596997 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 9.2007 15:41:14

Peters, I.: Benutzerzentrierte Erschließungsverfahren (2013) 0.01

0.013506081 = product of:
  0.027012162 = sum of:
    0.027012162 = product of:
      0.054024324 = sum of:
        0.054024324 = weight(_text_:u in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054024324 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried

Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.01

0.010922678 = product of:
  0.021845356 = sum of:
    0.021845356 = product of:
      0.04369071 = sum of:
        0.04369071 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04369071 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1596997 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Pages: S.14-22
Source: Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006) 0.01

0.010812899 = product of:
  0.021625798 = sum of:
    0.021625798 = product of:
      0.043251596 = sum of:
        0.043251596 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043251596 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1596997 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 5. 1.2008 19:22:48

Spiteri, L.: ¬The structure and form of folksonomy tags : the road to the public library catalogue (2007) 0.01

0.010804865 = product of:
  0.02160973 = sum of:
    0.02160973 = product of:
      0.04321946 = sum of:
        0.04321946 = weight(_text_:u in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04321946 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez

Watters, C.; Nizam, N.: Knowledge organization on the Web : the emergent role of social classification (2012) 0.01

0.009454256 = product of:
  0.018908512 = sum of:
    0.018908512 = product of:
      0.037817024 = sum of:
        0.037817024 = weight(_text_:u in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037817024 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan

Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008) 0.01

0.009268199 = product of:
  0.018536398 = sum of:
    0.018536398 = product of:
      0.037072796 = sum of:
        0.037072796 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037072796 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1596997 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 1. 8.2008 12:39:22

Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval (2008) 0.01
```
0.008103648 = product of:
  0.016207296 = sum of:
    0.016207296 = product of:
      0.032414593 = sum of:
        0.032414593 = weight(_text_:u in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032414593 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Die populären Web 2.0-Dienste werden von Prosumern - Produzenten und gleichsam Konsumenten - nicht nur dazu genutzt, Inhalte zu produzieren, sondern auch, um sie inhaltlich zu erschließen. Folksonomies erlauben es dem Nutzer, Dokumente mit eigenen Schlagworten, sog. Tags, zu beschreiben, ohne dabei auf gewisse Regeln oder Vorgaben achten zu müssen. Neben einigen Vorteilen zeigen Folksonomies aber auch zahlreiche Schwächen (u. a. einen Mangel an Präzision). Um diesen Nachteilen größtenteils entgegenzuwirken, schlagen wir eine Interpretation der Tags als natürlichsprachige Wörter vor. Dadurch ist es uns möglich, Methoden des Natural Language Processing (NLP) auf die Tags anzuwenden und so linguistische Probleme der Tags zu beseitigen. Darüber hinaus diskutieren wir Ansätze und weitere Vorschläge (Tagverteilungen, Kollaboration und akteurspezifische Aspekte) hinsichtlich eines Relevance Rankings von getaggten Dokumenten. Neben Vorschlägen auf ähnliche Dokumente ("more like this!") erlauben Folksonomies auch Hinweise auf verwandte Nutzer und damit auf Communities ("more like me!").

Peters, I.: Folksonomies, social tagging and information retrieval (2011) 0.01

0.008103648 = product of:
  0.016207296 = sum of:
    0.016207296 = product of:
      0.032414593 = sum of:
        0.032414593 = weight(_text_:u in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032414593 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Innovations in information retrieval: perspectives for theory and practice. Eds.: A. Foster, u. P. Rafferty

Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008) 0.01

0.0077234996 = product of:
  0.015446999 = sum of:
    0.015446999 = product of:
      0.030893998 = sum of:
        0.030893998 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030893998 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1596997 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

Kim, H.H.: Toward video semantic search based on a structured folksonomy (2011) 0.01

0.0067530405 = product of:
  0.013506081 = sum of:
    0.013506081 = product of:
      0.027012162 = sum of:
        0.027012162 = weight(_text_:u in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027012162 = score(doc=4350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Theme: Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

Braun, M.: Lesezeichen zum Stöbern : "Social bookmark"-Seiten setzen auf die Empfehlungen ihrer Nutzer (2007) 0.01

0.0061787996 = product of:
  0.012357599 = sum of:
    0.012357599 = product of:
      0.024715198 = sum of:
        0.024715198 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024715198 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1596997 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 3. 5.1997 8:44:22

Peters, I.: Folksonomies : indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0 (2009) 0.01
```
0.0054024323 = product of:
  0.010804865 = sum of:
    0.010804865 = product of:
      0.02160973 = sum of:
        0.02160973 = weight(_text_:u in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02160973 = score(doc=4203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Footnote

Zugl.: Düsseldorf, Univ., Diss., 2009 u.d.T.: Peters, Isabella: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval Rez. in: IWP - Information Wissenschaft & Praxis, 61(2010) Heft 8, S.469-470 (U. Spree): "... Nachdem sich die Rezensentin durch 418 Seiten Text hindurch gelesen hat, bleibt sie unentschieden, wie der auffällige Einsatz langer Zitate (im Durchschnitt drei Zitate, die länger als vier kleingedruckte Zeilen sind, pro Seite) zu bewerten ist, zumal die Zitate nicht selten rein illustrativen Charakter haben bzw. Isabella Peters noch einmal zitiert, was sie bereits in eigenen Worten ausgedrückt hat. Redundanz und Verlängerung der Lesezeit halten sich hier die Waage mit der Möglichkeit, dass sich die Leserin einen unmittelbaren Eindruck von Sprache und Duktus der zitierten Literatur verschaffen kann. Eindeutig unschön ist das Beenden eines Gedankens oder einer Argumentation durch ein Zitat (z. B. S. 170). Im deutschen Original entstehen auf diese Weise die für deutsche wissenschaftliche Qualifikationsarbeiten typischen denglischen Texte. Für alle, die sich für Wissensrepräsentation, Information Retrieval und kollaborative Informationsdienste interessieren, ist "Folksonomies : Indexing and Retrieval in Web 2.0" trotz der angeführten kleinen Mängel zur Lektüre und Anschaffung - wegen seines beinahe enzyklopädischen Charakters auch als Nachschlage- oder Referenzwerk geeignet - unbedingt zu empfehlen. Abschließend möchte ich mich in einem Punkt der Produktinfo von de Gruyter uneingeschränkt anschließen: ein "Grundlagenwerk für Folksonomies".

Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications