-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.04
0.0442965 = product of:
0.06644475 = sum of:
0.00817029 = weight(_text_:a in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00817029 = score(doc=1171,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.058274455 = product of:
0.08741168 = sum of:
0.04390331 = weight(_text_:29 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04390331 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.04350837 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04350837 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- All classifications are based on ideologies and Dewey is marked by its author's origins in 19th century North America. Subsequent revisions indicate changed ways of understanding the world. Section 157 (psycho-pathology) is now included with 616.89 (mental troubles), reflecting the move to a genetic-based approach. Table 5 (racial, ethnic and national groups) is however unchanged, despite changing views on such categorisation
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 16:50:24
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
- Type
- a
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.04
0.036745086 = product of:
0.055117626 = sum of:
0.004127479 = weight(_text_:a in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004127479 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.050990146 = product of:
0.07648522 = sum of:
0.038415395 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038415395 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.038069822 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038069822 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
- Type
- a
-
Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015)
0.03
0.029840205 = product of:
0.044760305 = sum of:
0.008338767 = weight(_text_:a in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008338767 = score(doc=2282,freq=16.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.036421537 = product of:
0.054632302 = sum of:
0.02743957 = weight(_text_:29 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02743957 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.027192732 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027192732 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The structure of a classification system contributes in a variety of ways to representing semantic relationships between its topics in the context of subject authority control. We explore this claim using the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system as a case study. The DDC links its classes into a notational hierarchy, supplemented by a network of relationships between topics, expressed in class descriptions and in the Relative Index (RI). Topics/subjects are expressed both by the natural language text of the caption and notes (including Manual notes) in a class description and by the controlled vocabulary of the RI's alphabetic index, which shows where topics are treated in the classificatory structure. The expression of relationships between topics depends on paradigmatic and syntagmatic relationships between natural language terms in captions, notes, and RI terms; on the meaning of specific note types; and on references recorded between RI terms. The specific means used in the DDC for capturing hierarchical (including disciplinary), equivalence and associative relationships are surveyed.
- Date
- 8.11.2015 21:27:22
- Source
- Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
- Type
- a
-
Foskett, A.C.: ¬The future of facetted classification (2000)
0.02
0.024856359 = product of:
0.03728454 = sum of:
0.011674274 = weight(_text_:a in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011674274 = score(doc=3162,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
0.025610264 = product of:
0.07683079 = sum of:
0.07683079 = weight(_text_:29 in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07683079 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 27. 1.2002 19:30:29
- Source
- The future of classification. Ed. R. Marcella u. A. Maltby
- Type
- a
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.02
0.01921991 = product of:
0.028829865 = sum of:
0.0070756786 = weight(_text_:a in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070756786 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.021754187 = product of:
0.065262556 = sum of:
0.065262556 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065262556 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Type
- a
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.02
0.01921991 = product of:
0.028829865 = sum of:
0.0070756786 = weight(_text_:a in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070756786 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.021754187 = product of:
0.065262556 = sum of:
0.065262556 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065262556 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Type
- a
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.02
0.01921991 = product of:
0.028829865 = sum of:
0.0070756786 = weight(_text_:a in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070756786 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.021754187 = product of:
0.065262556 = sum of:
0.065262556 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065262556 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
- Type
- a
-
Cheti, A.: ¬Le categorie nell'indicizzazione (1990)
0.02
0.016045783 = product of:
0.024068674 = sum of:
0.009434237 = weight(_text_:a in 3527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009434237 = score(doc=3527,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3527, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3527)
0.014634437 = product of:
0.04390331 = sum of:
0.04390331 = weight(_text_:29 in 3527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04390331 = score(doc=3527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3527)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Psychologists, philosophers and linguists analyse concepts and investigate their relationship to words. Concepts are also relevant to the issue of bibliographic classification, i.e. "catagorisation". Examines from a chronological point of view the various theories for the analysis and organisation of concepts ranging from the Vickery developed in 1954, to Austin's hypotheses, to Ranganathan's "fundamental categories" and the contribution made by CRG, the Classification Research Group. Illustrates other approaches to categorisation such as Farradane's (relationship between couples of concepts) and calls for a closer study of categories and concepts.
- Source
- Biblioteche oggi. 8(1990) no.1, S.29-49
- Type
- a
-
Beghtol, C.: ¬The facet concept as a universal principle of subdivision (2006)
0.02
0.015816946 = product of:
0.023725417 = sum of:
0.010920283 = weight(_text_:a in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010920283 = score(doc=1483,freq=14.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
0.012805132 = product of:
0.038415395 = sum of:
0.038415395 = weight(_text_:29 in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038415395 = score(doc=1483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Facet analysis has been one of the foremost contenders as a design principle for information retrieval classifications, both manual and electronic in the last fifty years. Evidence is presented that the facet concept has a claim to be considered as a method of subdivision that is cognitively available to human beings, regardless of language, culture, or academic discipline. The possibility that faceting is a universal method of subdivision enhances the claim that facet analysis as an unusually useful design principle for information retrieval classifications in any field. This possibility needs further investigation in an age when information access across boundaries is both necessary and possible.
- Date
- 29. 2.2008 19:19:30
- Source
- Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
- Type
- a
-
Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995)
0.02
0.0152769 = product of:
0.022915348 = sum of:
0.010110217 = weight(_text_:a in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010110217 = score(doc=4940,freq=12.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.012805132 = product of:
0.038415395 = sum of:
0.038415395 = weight(_text_:29 in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038415395 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A detailed examination of the UDC's history, function and future prospects. Among topics discussed are: the early pioneering work of P. Otlet and H. LaFontaine; the development of Colon Classification; the 'UDC versus switching language' debate in the 1970s; the FID standard reference code project; and the recent scheme by Williamson and McIlwaine to restructure UDC completely, converting it into a Colon Classification and also creating a thesaurus drawn from the same classification. Comments that UDC, far from being a 'prehistoric monster', is becoming a sort of test laboratory for developing new and interesting documentation structures
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 17:18:10
- Type
- a
-
Grimaldi, T.: ¬L'indicizzazione dal punto di vista cognitivo (II) (1996)
0.02
0.015203151 = product of:
0.022804726 = sum of:
0.00817029 = weight(_text_:a in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00817029 = score(doc=992,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.014634437 = product of:
0.04390331 = sum of:
0.04390331 = weight(_text_:29 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04390331 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In relation to indexing, one of the chief implications of cognitive epistemology is the necessity for redefining knowledge representation concepts for information filing and retrieval purposes. Such a redefinition involves abandoning the traditional, hierarchical, closed-structure classification model. Considers the following in detail: a semiotic critique of classification principles; Ranganathan's classification theory; Ranganathan and cognitive epistemology; and some reflections on the DDC and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification
- Date
- 14. 7.1996 13:29:45
- Type
- a
-
Tennis, J.T.: Structure of classification theory : on foundational and the higher layers of classification theory (2016)
0.02
0.015203151 = product of:
0.022804726 = sum of:
0.00817029 = weight(_text_:a in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00817029 = score(doc=4889,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
0.014634437 = product of:
0.04390331 = sum of:
0.04390331 = weight(_text_:29 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04390331 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
- Type
- a
-
Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018)
0.02
0.015073854 = product of:
0.02261078 = sum of:
0.011733686 = weight(_text_:a in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011733686 = score(doc=4152,freq=22.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.25351265 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.010877093 = product of:
0.032631278 = sum of:
0.032631278 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032631278 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This is the fourth in a series of papers on classification based on phenomena instead of disciplines. Together with types, levels and facets that have been discussed in the previous parts, themes and rhemes are further structural components of such a classification. In a statement or in a longer document, a base theme and several particular themes can be identified. Base theme should be cited first in a classmark, followed by particular themes, each with its own facets. In some cases, rhemes can also be expressed, that is new information provided about a theme, converting an abstract statement ("wolves, affected by cervids") into a claim that some thing actually occurs ("wolves are affected by cervids"). In the Integrative Levels Classification rhemes can be expressed by special deictic classes, including those for actual specimens, anaphoras, unknown values, conjunctions and spans, whole universe, anthropocentric favoured classes, and favoured host classes. These features, together with rules for pronounciation, make a classification of phenomena a true language, that may be suitable for many uses.
- Date
- 17. 2.2018 18:22:25
- Type
- a
-
Loehrlein, A.J.; Lemieux, V.L.; Bennett, M.: ¬The classification of financial products (2014)
0.02
0.01506523 = product of:
0.022597846 = sum of:
0.0070756786 = weight(_text_:a in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070756786 = score(doc=1196,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
0.015522166 = product of:
0.046566498 = sum of:
0.046566498 = weight(_text_:29 in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046566498 = score(doc=1196,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In the wake of the global financial crisis, the U.S. Dodd- Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank) was enacted to provide increased transparency in financial markets. In response to Dodd-Frank, a series of rules relating to swaps record keeping have been issued, and one such rule calls for the creation of a financial products classification system. The manner in which financial products are classified will have a profound effect on data integration and analysis in the financial industry. This article considers various approaches that can be taken when classifying financial products and recommends the use of facet analysis. The article argues that this type of analysis is flexible enough to accommodate multiple viewpoints and rigorous enough to facilitate inferences that are based on the hierarchical structure. Various use cases are examined that pertain to the organization of financial products. The use cases confirm the practical utility of taxonomies that are designed according to faceted principles.
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 16:29:52
- Type
- a
-
Poli, R.: Framing information (2003)
0.01
0.014203634 = product of:
0.021305451 = sum of:
0.006671014 = weight(_text_:a in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006671014 = score(doc=2711,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
0.014634437 = product of:
0.04390331 = sum of:
0.04390331 = weight(_text_:29 in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04390331 = score(doc=2711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The distinction between semiotic, semantic and ontological classifications is introduced. A few examples of semantic and ontological categories are then provided and discussed. The thesis is defended that semantic categories depend an ontological categories.
- Date
- 11. 9.2004 15:29:04
- Type
- a
-
Maple, A.: Faceted access : a review of the literature (1995)
0.01
0.014203634 = product of:
0.021305451 = sum of:
0.006671014 = weight(_text_:a in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006671014 = score(doc=5099,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
0.014634437 = product of:
0.04390331 = sum of:
0.04390331 = weight(_text_:29 in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04390331 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 20. 8.2006 12:29:16
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.01
0.014115869 = product of:
0.021173803 = sum of:
0.006671014 = weight(_text_:a in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006671014 = score(doc=7242,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.01450279 = product of:
0.04350837 = sum of:
0.04350837 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04350837 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a comparative study of 3 classification schemes: LCC, DDC and NLM Classification to determine their effectiveness in classifying materials on health insurance. Examined 2 hypotheses: that there would be no differences in the scatter of the 3 classification schemes; and that there would be overlap between all 3 schemes but no difference in the classes into which the subject was placed. There was subject scatter in all 3 classification schemes and litlle overlap between the 3 systems
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
- Type
- a
-
Kublik, A.; Clevette, V.; Ward, D.; Olson, H.A.: Adapting dominant classifications to particular contexts (2003)
0.01
0.013988232 = product of:
0.020982347 = sum of:
0.01000652 = weight(_text_:a in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01000652 = score(doc=5516,freq=16.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
0.010975828 = product of:
0.032927483 = sum of:
0.032927483 = weight(_text_:29 in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032927483 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper addresses the process of adapting to a particular culture or context a classification that has grown out of western culture to become a global standard. The authors use a project that adapts DDC for use in a feminist/women's issues context to demonstrate an approach that works. The project is particularly useful as an interdisciplinary example. Discussion consists of four parts: (1) definition of the problem indicating the need for adaptation and efforts to date; (2) description of the methodology developed for creating an expansion; (3) description of the interface developed for actually doing the work, with its potential for a distributed group to work on it together (could even be internationally distributed); and (4) generalization of how the methodology could be used for particular contexts by country, ethnicity, perspective or other defining factors.
- Date
- 30. 7.2006 16:38:29
- Type
- a
-
Frické, M.: Faceted classification, analysis and search : some questions on their interrelations (2017)
0.01
0.013988232 = product of:
0.020982347 = sum of:
0.01000652 = weight(_text_:a in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01000652 = score(doc=4121,freq=16.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.010975828 = product of:
0.032927483 = sum of:
0.032927483 = weight(_text_:29 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032927483 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A description is provided of basic faceted classification, which involves combinations of foci across facets, where the foci within a facet are dependent (i.e., exclusive) and the foci across facets are independent (i.e., orthogonal). This is shown to be suitable for organizing the basic goods that Amazon, the online retailer, sells and for progressive filtering as a mode of search. However, on closer inspection, the Amazon case involves a sorted domain. This is problematic for basic faceted classification. Additionally, books from Amazon would typically carry subject classification, which also is difficult for basic faceted classification. It does not support filtering as a mode of search. Subject classification really requires relatively sophisticated linguistic and logical constructors and modifiers, such as adjectives, adverbs, functions, binary relations, and transitive verbs. These can be part of a synthetic subject classification scheme, but they pose a challenge for faceting.
- Date
- 29. 9.2017 18:53:46
- Type
- a
-
Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.013922408 = product of:
0.020883612 = sum of:
0.01000652 = weight(_text_:a in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01000652 = score(doc=2464,freq=16.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.010877093 = product of:
0.032631278 = sum of:
0.032631278 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032631278 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
- Source
- Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
- Type
- a
