-
Malmsten, M.: Making a library catalogue part of the Semantic Web (2008)
0.04
0.038759433 = product of:
0.05813915 = sum of:
0.0071490034 = weight(_text_:a in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071490034 = score(doc=2640,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.050990146 = product of:
0.07648522 = sum of:
0.038415395 = weight(_text_:29 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038415395 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.038069822 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038069822 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Library catalogues contain an enormous amount of structured, high-quality data, however, this data is generally not made available to semantic web applications. In this paper we describe the tools and techniques used to make the Swedish Union Catalogue (LIBRIS) part of the Semantic Web and Linked Data. The focus is on links to and between resources and the mechanisms used to make data available, rather than perfect description of the individual resources. We also present a method of creating links between records of the same work.
- Date
- 20. 2.2009 10:29:39
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
- Type
- a
-
Hooland, S. van; Verborgh, R.; Wilde, M. De; Hercher, J.; Mannens, E.; Wa, R.Van de: Evaluating the success of vocabulary reconciliation for cultural heritage collections (2013)
0.03
0.03441113 = product of:
0.05161669 = sum of:
0.0079108495 = weight(_text_:a in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0079108495 = score(doc=662,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
0.043705843 = product of:
0.06555876 = sum of:
0.032927483 = weight(_text_:29 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032927483 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
0.032631278 = weight(_text_:22 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032631278 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The concept of Linked Data has made its entrance in the cultural heritage sector due to its potential use for the integration of heterogeneous collections and deriving additional value out of existing metadata. However, practitioners and researchers alike need a better understanding of what outcome they can reasonably expect of the reconciliation process between their local metadata and established controlled vocabularies which are already a part of the Linked Data cloud. This paper offers an in-depth analysis of how a locally developed vocabulary can be successfully reconciled with the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and the Arts and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) through the help of a general-purpose tool for interactive data transformation (OpenRefine). Issues negatively affecting the reconciliation process are identified and solutions are proposed in order to derive maximum value from existing metadata and controlled vocabularies in an automated manner.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:29:20
- Type
- a
-
Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010)
0.03
0.032472737 = product of:
0.048709102 = sum of:
0.00500326 = weight(_text_:a in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00500326 = score(doc=4649,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.043705843 = product of:
0.06555876 = sum of:
0.032927483 = weight(_text_:29 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032927483 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.032631278 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032631278 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- More and more cultural heritage institutions publish their collections, vocabularies and metadata on the Web. The resulting Web of linked cultural data opens up exciting new possibilities for searching and browsing through these cultural heritage collections. We report on ongoing work in which we investigate the estimation of relevance in this Web of Culture. We study existing measures of semantic distance and how they apply to two use cases. The use cases relate to the structured, multilingual and multimodal nature of the Culture Web. We distinguish between measures using the Web, such as Google distance and PMI, and measures using the Linked Data Web, i.e. the semantic structure of metadata vocabularies. We perform a small study in which we compare these semantic distance measures to human judgements of relevance. Although it is too early to draw any definitive conclusions, the study provides new insights into the applicability of semantic distance measures to the Web of Culture, and clear starting points for further research.
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
26.12.2011 13:40:22
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.03
0.027922511 = product of:
0.041883767 = sum of:
0.031877246 = product of:
0.12750898 = sum of:
0.12750898 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12750898 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34031555 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01000652 = weight(_text_:a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01000652 = score(doc=701,freq=36.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Metadata and semantics research : 7th Research Conference, MTSR 2013 Thessaloniki, Greece, November 19-22, 2013. Proceedings (2013)
0.02
0.024392372 = product of:
0.036588557 = sum of:
0.005837137 = weight(_text_:a in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005837137 = score(doc=1155,freq=16.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.03075142 = product of:
0.04612713 = sum of:
0.019207697 = weight(_text_:29 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019207697 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.026919432 = weight(_text_:22 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026919432 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata and semantics are integral to any information system and significant to the sphere of Web data. Research focusing on metadata and semantics is crucial for advancing our understanding and knowledge of metadata; and, more profoundly for being able to effectively discover, use, archive, and repurpose information. In response to this need, researchers are actively examining methods for generating, reusing, and interchanging metadata. Integrated with these developments is research on the application of computational methods, linked data, and data analytics. A growing body of work also targets conceptual and theoretical designs providing foundational frameworks for metadata and semantic applications. There is no doubt that metadata weaves its way into nearly every aspect of our information ecosystem, and there is great motivation for advancing the current state of metadata and semantics. To this end, it is vital that scholars and practitioners convene and share their work.
The MTSR 2013 program and the contents of these proceedings show a rich diversity of research and practices, drawing on problems from metadata and semantically focused tools and technologies, linked data, cross-language semantics, ontologies, metadata models, and semantic system and metadata standards. The general session of the conference included 18 papers covering a broad spectrum of topics, proving the interdisciplinary field of metadata, and was divided into three main themes: platforms for research data sets, system architecture and data management; metadata and ontology validation, evaluation, mapping and interoperability; and content management. Metadata as a research topic is maturing, and the conference also supported the following five tracks: Metadata and Semantics for Open Repositories, Research Information Systems and Data Infrastructures; Metadata and Semantics for Cultural Collections and Applications; Metadata and Semantics for Agriculture, Food and Environment; Big Data and Digital Libraries in Health, Science and Technology; and European and National Projects, and Project Networking. Each track had a rich selection of papers, giving broader diversity to MTSR, and enabling deeper exploration of significant topics.
All the papers underwent a thorough and rigorous peer-review process. The review and selection this year was highly competitive and only papers containing significant research results, innovative methods, or novel and best practices were accepted for publication. Only 29 of 89 submissions were accepted as full papers, representing 32.5% of the total number of submissions. Additional contributions covering noteworthy and important results in special tracks or project reports were accepted, totaling 42 accepted contributions. This year's conference included two outstanding keynote speakers. Dr. Stefan Gradmann, a professor arts department of KU Leuven (Belgium) and director of university library, addressed semantic research drawing from his work with Europeana. The title of his presentation was, "Towards a Semantic Research Library: Digital Humanities Research, Europeana and the Linked Data Paradigm". Dr. Michail Salampasis, associate professor from our conference host institution, the Department of Informatics of the Alexander TEI of Thessaloniki, presented new potential, intersecting search and linked data. The title of his talk was, "Rethinking the Search Experience: What Could Professional Search Systems Do Better?"
- Date
- 17.12.2013 12:51:22
-
Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J.; Lassila, O.: ¬The Semantic Web : a new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities (2001)
0.02
0.01900394 = product of:
0.02850591 = sum of:
0.010212863 = weight(_text_:a in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010212863 = score(doc=376,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
0.018293047 = product of:
0.05487914 = sum of:
0.05487914 = weight(_text_:29 in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05487914 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 31.12.1996 19:29:41
- Type
- a
-
Tennis, J.T.: Scheme versioning in the Semantic Web (2006)
0.02
0.016788159 = product of:
0.025182236 = sum of:
0.010547799 = weight(_text_:a in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010547799 = score(doc=4939,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
0.014634437 = product of:
0.04390331 = sum of:
0.04390331 = weight(_text_:29 in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04390331 = score(doc=4939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a conceptual framework and methodology for managing scheme versioning for the Semantic Web. The first part of the paper introduces the concept of vocabulary encoding schemes, distinguished from metadata schemas, and discusses the characteristics of changes in schemes. The paper then presents a proposal to use a value record-similar to a term record in thesaurus management techniques-to manage scheme versioning challenges for the Semantic Web. The conclusion identifies future research directions.
- Date
- 23.12.2007 10:14:29
- Type
- a
-
Papadakis, I. et al.: Highlighting timely information in libraries through social and semantic Web technologies (2016)
0.02
0.016016591 = product of:
0.024024887 = sum of:
0.0058963983 = weight(_text_:a in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058963983 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
0.018128488 = product of:
0.054385465 = sum of:
0.054385465 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054385465 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
- Type
- a
-
Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J.; Lassila, O.: Mein Computer versteht mich (2001)
0.02
0.015203151 = product of:
0.022804726 = sum of:
0.00817029 = weight(_text_:a in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00817029 = score(doc=4550,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
0.014634437 = product of:
0.04390331 = sum of:
0.04390331 = weight(_text_:29 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04390331 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 31.12.1996 19:29:41
- Footnote
- Dt. Übersetzung von: The Semantic Web: a new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. In: Scientific American. 284(2001) no.5, S.34-43.
- Type
- a
-
Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003)
0.02
0.015200106 = product of:
0.022800159 = sum of:
0.010110217 = weight(_text_:a in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010110217 = score(doc=1026,freq=12.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
0.012689941 = product of:
0.038069822 = sum of:
0.038069822 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038069822 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- We have created software applications that allow users to both author and use Semantic Web metadata. To create and use a layer of semantic content on top of the existing Web, we have (1) implemented a user interface that expedites the task of attributing metadata to resources on the Web, and (2) augmented a Web browser to leverage this semantic metadata to provide relevant information and tasks to the user. This project provides a framework for annotating and reorganizing existing files, pages, and sites on the Web that is similar to Vannevar Bushrsquos original concepts of trail blazing and associative indexing.
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
- Type
- a
-
O'Hara, K.; Hall, W.: Semantic Web (2009)
0.01
0.014689637 = product of:
0.022034455 = sum of:
0.009229324 = weight(_text_:a in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009229324 = score(doc=3871,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
0.012805132 = product of:
0.038415395 = sum of:
0.038415395 = weight(_text_:29 in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038415395 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The "semantic web (SW)" is a vision of a web of linked data, allowing querying, integration, and sharing of data from distributed sources in heterogeneous formats, using ontologies to provide an associated and explicit semantic interpretation. This entry describes the series of layered formalisms and standards that underlie this vision, and chronicles their historical and ongoing development. A number of applications, scientific and otherwise, academic and commercial, are reviewed. The SW has often been a controversial enterprise, and some of the controversies are reviewed, and misconceptions defused.
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:29:18
- Type
- a
-
Stamou, G.; Chortaras, A.: Ontological query answering over semantic data (2017)
0.01
0.014203634 = product of:
0.021305451 = sum of:
0.006671014 = weight(_text_:a in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006671014 = score(doc=3926,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
0.014634437 = product of:
0.04390331 = sum of:
0.04390331 = weight(_text_:29 in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04390331 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Pages
- S.29-63
- Type
- a
-
Ilik, V.: Distributed person data : using Semantic Web compliant data in subject name headings (2015)
0.01
0.014182603 = product of:
0.021273904 = sum of:
0.008338767 = weight(_text_:a in 2292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008338767 = score(doc=2292,freq=16.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 2292, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2292)
0.012935137 = product of:
0.03880541 = sum of:
0.03880541 = weight(_text_:29 in 2292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03880541 = score(doc=2292,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 2292, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2292)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Providing efficient access to information is a crucial library mission. Subject classification is one of the major pillars that guarantees the accessibility of records in libraries. In this paper we discuss the need to associate person IDs and URIs with subjects when a named person happens to be the subject of the document. This is often the case with biographies, schools of thought in philosophy, politics, art, and literary criticism. Using Semantic Web compliant data in subject name headings enhances the ability to collocate topics about a person. Also, in retrieval, books about a person would be easily linked to works by that same person. In the context of the Semantic Web, it is expected that, as the available information grows, one would be more effective in the task of information retrieval. Information about a person or, as in the case of this paper, about a researcher exist in various databases, which can be discipline specific or publishers' databases, and in such cases they have an assigned identifier. They also exist in institutional directory databases. We argue that these various databases can be leveraged to support improved discoverability and retrieval of research output for individual authors and institutions, as well as works about those authors.
- Date
- 8.11.2015 21:30:29
- Source
- Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
- Type
- a
-
Dunsire, G.: FRBR and the Semantic Web (2012)
0.01
0.01404006 = product of:
0.02106009 = sum of:
0.008254958 = weight(_text_:a in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008254958 = score(doc=1928,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
0.012805132 = product of:
0.038415395 = sum of:
0.038415395 = weight(_text_:29 in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038415395 = score(doc=1928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Each of the FR family of models has been represented in Resource Description Framework (RDF), the basis of the Semantic Web. This has involved analysis of the entity-relationship diagrams and text of the models to identify and create the RDF classes, properties, definitions and scope notes required. The work has shown that it is possible to seamlessly connect the models within a semantic framework, specifically in the treatment of names, identifiers, and subjects, and link the RDF elements to those in related namespaces.
- Content
- Contribution to a special issue "The FRBR family of conceptual models: toward a linked future"
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 10:50:02
- Type
- a
-
Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000)
0.01
0.013963266 = product of:
0.020944899 = sum of:
0.008254958 = weight(_text_:a in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008254958 = score(doc=759,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
0.012689941 = product of:
0.038069822 = sum of:
0.038069822 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038069822 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- XML will have a profound impact on the way data is exchanged on the Internet. An important feature of this language is the separation of content from presentation, which makes it easier to select and/or reformat the data. However, due to the likelihood of numerous industry and domain specific DTDs, those who wish to integrate information will still be faced with the problem of semantic interoperability. In this paper we discuss why this problem is not solved by XML, and then discuss why the Resource Description Framework is only a partial solution. We then present the SHOE language, which we feel has many of the features necessary to enable a semantic web, and describe an existing set of tools that make it easy to use the language.
- Date
- 11. 5.2013 19:22:18
- Type
- a
-
Padmavathi, T.; Krishnamurthy, M.: Semantic Web tools and techniques for knowledge organization : an overview (2017)
0.01
0.013302757 = product of:
0.019954136 = sum of:
0.0071490034 = weight(_text_:a in 3618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071490034 = score(doc=3618,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 3618, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3618)
0.012805132 = product of:
0.038415395 = sum of:
0.038415395 = weight(_text_:29 in 3618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038415395 = score(doc=3618,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3618, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3618)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The enormous amount of information generated every day and spread across the web is diversified in nature far beyond human consumption. To overcome this difficulty, the transformation of current unstructured information into a structured form called a "Semantic Web" was proposed by Tim Berners-Lee in 1989 to enable computers to understand and interpret the information they store. The aim of the semantic web is the integration of heterogeneous and distributed data spread across the web for knowledge discovery. The core of sematic web technologies includes knowledge representation languages RDF and OWL, ontology editors and reasoning tools, and ontology query languages such as SPARQL have also been discussed.
- Date
- 29. 9.2017 18:30:57
- Type
- a
-
Blumauer, A.; Pellegrini, T.: Semantic Web Revisited : Eine kurze Einführung in das Social Semantic Web (2009)
0.01
0.013225963 = product of:
0.019838944 = sum of:
0.0071490034 = weight(_text_:a in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071490034 = score(doc=4855,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
0.012689941 = product of:
0.038069822 = sum of:
0.038069822 = weight(_text_:22 in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038069822 = score(doc=4855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Pages
- S.3-22
- Source
- Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
- Type
- a
-
Franklin, R.A.: Re-inventing subject access for the semantic web (2003)
0.01
0.013028663 = product of:
0.019542994 = sum of:
0.008665901 = weight(_text_:a in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008665901 = score(doc=2556,freq=12.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
0.010877093 = product of:
0.032631278 = sum of:
0.032631278 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032631278 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14056681 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- First generation scholarly research on the Web lacked a firm system of authority control. Second generation Web research is beginning to model subject access with library science principles of bibliographic control and cataloguing. Harnessing the Web and organising the intellectual content with standards and controlled vocabulary provides precise search and retrieval capability, increasing relevance and efficient use of technology. Dublin Core metadata standards permit a full evaluation and cataloguing of Web resources appropriate to highly specific research needs and discovery. Current research points to a type of structure based on a system of faceted classification. This system allows the semantic and syntactic relationships to be defined. Controlled vocabulary, such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, can be assigned, not in a hierarchical structure, but rather as descriptive facets of relating concepts. Web design features such as this are adding value to discovery and filtering out data that lack authority. The system design allows for scalability and extensibility, two technical features that are integral to future development of the digital library and resource discovery.
- Date
- 30.12.2008 18:22:46
- Type
- a
-
Siwecka, D.: Knowledge organization systems used in European national libraries towards interoperability of the semantic Web (2018)
0.01
0.012901037 = product of:
0.019351555 = sum of:
0.0047171186 = weight(_text_:a in 4815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047171186 = score(doc=4815,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4815, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4815)
0.014634437 = product of:
0.04390331 = sum of:
0.04390331 = weight(_text_:29 in 4815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04390331 = score(doc=4815,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4815, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4815)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 18. 1.2019 18:46:29
- Type
- a
-
Aslam, S.; Sonkar, S.K.: Semantic Web : an overview (2019)
0.01
0.012901037 = product of:
0.019351555 = sum of:
0.0047171186 = weight(_text_:a in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0047171186 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04628442 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.014634437 = product of:
0.04390331 = sum of:
0.04390331 = weight(_text_:29 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04390331 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14120336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040140964 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 10.12.2020 9:29:12
- Type
- a
