Search (121 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Assem, M. van; Menken, M.R.; Schreiber, G.; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.: ¬A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL (2004) 0.09 
    0.091745205 = product of:
  0.18349041 = sum of:
    0.034259215 = weight(_text_:j in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034259215 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
    0.1492312 = weight(_text_:van in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1492312 = score(doc=4644,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24466558 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.60993946 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC'04). Eds. D. Plexousakis and F. van Harmelen
  2. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.05 
    0.04719788 = product of:
  0.09439576 = sum of:
    0.058730084 = weight(_text_:j in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058730084 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
    0.035665676 = product of:
      0.07133135 = sum of:
        0.07133135 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07133135 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1536382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043873694 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  3. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.05 
    0.04719788 = product of:
  0.09439576 = sum of:
    0.058730084 = weight(_text_:j in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058730084 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
    0.035665676 = product of:
      0.07133135 = sum of:
        0.07133135 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07133135 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1536382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043873694 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  4. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.05 
    0.04719788 = product of:
  0.09439576 = sum of:
    0.058730084 = weight(_text_:j in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058730084 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
    0.035665676 = product of:
      0.07133135 = sum of:
        0.07133135 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07133135 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1536382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043873694 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  5. Riege, U.: Thesaurus und Klassifikation Sozialwissenschaften : Entwicklung der elektronischen Versionen (1998) 0.04 
    0.039331567 = product of:
  0.07866313 = sum of:
    0.04894173 = weight(_text_:j in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04894173 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
    0.0297214 = product of:
      0.0594428 = sum of:
        0.0594428 = weight(_text_:22 in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0594428 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1536382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043873694 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  6. Alkämper, H.: ¬Die Neugestaltung des Parlamentsthesaurus PARTHES (1998) 0.04 
    0.039331567 = product of:
  0.07866313 = sum of:
    0.04894173 = weight(_text_:j in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04894173 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
    0.0297214 = product of:
      0.0594428 = sum of:
        0.0594428 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0594428 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1536382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043873694 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  7. Schenkel, M.: Vom Leitkartenthesaurus zum Online-Bibliotheksthesaurus : Die Revision des Dokumentationssystems der Bibliothek des Deutschen Bundestages (1949-1998) (1998) 0.04 
    0.039331567 = product of:
  0.07866313 = sum of:
    0.04894173 = weight(_text_:j in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04894173 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
    0.0297214 = product of:
      0.0594428 = sum of:
        0.0594428 = weight(_text_:22 in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0594428 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1536382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043873694 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  8. Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997) 0.03 
    0.031465255 = product of:
  0.06293051 = sum of:
    0.039153386 = weight(_text_:j in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039153386 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
    0.02377712 = product of:
      0.04755424 = sum of:
        0.04755424 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04755424 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1536382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043873694 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
  9. Viegener, J.; Maurer, A.: ¬Ein Ansatz zur Dynamisierung von Thesauri in Informationssystemen (1993) 0.03 
    0.030840017 = product of:
  0.061680034 = sum of:
    0.039153386 = weight(_text_:j in 5590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039153386 = score(doc=5590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 5590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5590)
    0.02252665 = product of:
      0.0450533 = sum of:
        0.0450533 = weight(_text_:den in 5590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0450533 = score(doc=5590,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12575069 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043873694 = queryNorm
            0.35827476 = fieldWeight in 5590, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Im folgenden wird ein Ansatz für die Verbesserung von dokumentbasierten Informationssystemen unter Verwendung von Methoden der Künstlichen Intelligenz vorgestellt. Dabei wird ein dynamischer Thesaurus verwendet, der speziell an den jeweiligen Dokumentenbestand angepaßt ist. Erzeugung und Pflege dieses Thesaurus werden (teil-) automatisiert durch eine Wissensakquisitionskomponente durchgeführt; dies geschieht unter Ausnutzung von Benutzerwissen und durch Analyse des Dokumentenbestandes. Hierzu ist ein erweiterter Thesaurusbegriff notwendig, bei dem dieser als Wissensrepräsentationsstruktur gesehen wird. Die Verwendung einer graphischen Oberfläche (GUI) macht den Thesaurus dem Benutzer direkt zugänglich
  10. Schenk, J.: Konzept Gender Thesaurus : zur Bedeutung einer gemeinsamen Dokumentationssprache für Forschung und Informationseinrichtungen (2016) 0.03 
    0.027541067 = product of:
  0.055082135 = sum of:
    0.039153386 = weight(_text_:j in 3141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039153386 = score(doc=3141,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3141, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3141)
    0.015928747 = product of:
      0.031857494 = sum of:
        0.031857494 = weight(_text_:den in 3141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031857494 = score(doc=3141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12575069 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043873694 = queryNorm
            0.25333852 = fieldWeight in 3141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3141)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Angesichts aktueller und voraussichtlich in naher Zukunft startender Infrastrukturprojekte der Frauen/Gender-Informationseinrichtungen einerseits und der Gender Studies andererseits, soll im Folgenden auf den Sinn und die Notwendigkeit einer gemeinsamen gendersensiblen Dokumentationssprache hingewiesen werden. Dieser Beitrag entstand im Rahmen des Masterstudiums der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaften (MALIS) an der Technischen Hochschule Köln und verfolgt das Ziel, Vorschläge für die Erarbeitung eines Gender Thesaurus zu entwickeln.
  11. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.03 
    0.027532097 = product of:
  0.055064194 = sum of:
    0.034259215 = weight(_text_:j in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034259215 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
    0.020804979 = product of:
      0.041609958 = sum of:
        0.041609958 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041609958 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1536382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043873694 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  12. Stys, T.; Klos, J.; Kunkel, P.: Thesauri entwickeln und anwenden mit MIDOSThesaurus (2003) 0.03 
    0.026985016 = product of:
  0.05397003 = sum of:
    0.034259215 = weight(_text_:j in 1765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034259215 = score(doc=1765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 1765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1765)
    0.019710818 = product of:
      0.039421637 = sum of:
        0.039421637 = weight(_text_:den in 1765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039421637 = score(doc=1765,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12575069 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043873694 = queryNorm
            0.31349042 = fieldWeight in 1765, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1765)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Das Thesaurusprogramm MIDOSThesaurus wird hinsichtlich seiner Funktionalität und Handhabung vorgestellt. Mit MIDOSThesaurus können polyhierarchische, mehrsprachige Thesauri aufgebaut, gepflegt und genutzt werden. MIDOSThesaurus ist kompatibel mit den einschlägigen Internationalen Normen, geht aber in seiner Funktionalität weit über diese Grundanforderungen hinaus. MIDOSThesaurus bietet leistungsfähige Importfunktionen, komfortable Möglichkeiten zur Thesauruspflege und übersichtliche Display- und Navigationsmöglichkeiten. Für den Exportfertiger Thesauri werden neben einer Textausgabe die Ausgabe von weitgehend satzfertigen Druckmanuskripten und die Generierung von internetfähigen HTML-Anwendungen aufKnopfdruck angeboten. Ein Thesaurus-Export im XML-Format ist ebenfalls vorgesehen. MIDOSThesaurus kann als selbstständiges Einzelsystem zur Thesauruspflege benutzt werden. Es kann aber auch über eine Programmschnittstelle, die mit Ouelltext dokumentiert ist, mit anderen Datenbanksystem gekoppelt und so für Recherche und Indexierung genutzt werden.
  13. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesauri facing new challenges (1990) 0.03 
    0.026380597 = product of:
  0.10552239 = sum of:
    0.10552239 = weight(_text_:van in 2218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10552239 = score(doc=2218,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24466558 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.43129233 = fieldWeight in 2218, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2218)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The chairman of the thesaurus software seminar held on 14.8.1990 in Darmstadt, introduces into the topics by asking the following 10 questions and by providing his answers to them: (1) what is new in the view? (2) what is the real point of attraction? (3) cannot information retrieval profit from machine processing of language? (4) can we do better now? (5) how van we do better? (6) when does fully automatic IR arrive? (7) thesauri for machine-aided IR - how do we get there? (8) which is the right way, which is the model, what to standardize? (9) can IR people do it alone? (10) are there advanced information services with a truly human interface
  14. Raupp, J.: Konzeption eines Standard-Thesaurus für Ökologischen Landbau (1994) 0.02 
    0.024098434 = product of:
  0.048196867 = sum of:
    0.034259215 = weight(_text_:j in 8606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034259215 = score(doc=8606,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 8606, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8606)
    0.013937653 = product of:
      0.027875306 = sum of:
        0.027875306 = weight(_text_:den in 8606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027875306 = score(doc=8606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12575069 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043873694 = queryNorm
            0.2216712 = fieldWeight in 8606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8606)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die Vergabe von Keywords mit Hilfe eines (poly)hierarchisch gegliederten Thesaurus hat gegenüber der freien Verschlagwortung eine Reihe von Vorteilen. Ein Nachteil des Thesaurus ist jedoch, daß er einigen Aufwand für Planung, Aufbau und Pflege erfordert. Ein Standard-Thesaurus, der für die eigenen Bedürfnisse modifiziert wird, kann deshalb ein Weg sein, um die Vorteile des Thesaurus nutzen zu können, ohne gleichzeitig den erwähnten Aufwand in vollem Umfang leisten zu müssen. Konzeption, Aufbau und Inhalt eines Standard-Thesaurus Ökologischer Landbau werden hier vorgestellt. Der Vergleich mit dem üblicherweise verwendeten Vokabular AGROVOC macht die Überlegenheit des Standard-Thesuaurs im Hinblick auf korrekte Verschlagwortung deutlich
  15. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Teil 1 der Thesaurus-Norm ISO 25964 veröffentlicht (2012) 0.02 
    0.024098434 = product of:
  0.048196867 = sum of:
    0.034259215 = weight(_text_:j in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034259215 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
    0.013937653 = product of:
      0.027875306 = sum of:
        0.027875306 = weight(_text_:den in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027875306 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12575069 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043873694 = queryNorm
            0.2216712 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die neue internationale Thesaurus-Norm ISO 25964-1 ersetzt die Normen ISO 2788 und ISO 5964. Ihr englischer Titel lautet "Information and documentation - Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies - Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval". Die Norm umfasst ein- und mehrsprachige Thesauri und berück sichtigt die Notwendigkeit von Datenaustausch, Vernetzung und Interoperabilität. Zu den Inhalten gehören - Konstruktion ein- und mehrsprachiger Thesauri - Unterschied zwischen Begriff und Benennung und ihren Beziehungen - Facettenanalyse und Layout - Einsatz von Thesauri in computergestützten und vernetzten Systemen - Management und Pflege von Thesauri - Richtlinien für Thesaurusmanagement-Software - Datenmodell für ein- und mehrsprachige Thesauri - Empfehlungen
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2012.63.issue-2/iwp-2012-0008/iwp-2012-0008.xml?format=INT.
  16. Aitchison, J.; Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Thesaurus : a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future (2004) 0.02 
    0.02359894 = product of:
  0.04719788 = sum of:
    0.029365042 = weight(_text_:j in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029365042 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
    0.017832838 = product of:
      0.035665676 = sum of:
        0.035665676 = weight(_text_:22 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035665676 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1536382 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043873694 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:46:13
  17. Assem, M. van; Gangemi, A.; Schreiber, G.: Conversion of WordNet to a standard RDF/OWL representation (2006) 0.02 
    0.02261194 = product of:
  0.09044776 = sum of:
    0.09044776 = weight(_text_:van in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09044776 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24466558 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.36967915 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  18. Assem, M. van; Malaisé, V.; Miles, A.; Schreiber, G.: ¬A method to convert thesauri to SKOS (2006) 0.02 
    0.02261194 = product of:
  0.09044776 = sum of:
    0.09044776 = weight(_text_:van in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09044776 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24466558 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.36967915 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  19. Assem, M. van: Converting and integrating vocabularies for the Semantic Web (2010) 0.02 
    0.021318743 = product of:
  0.08527497 = sum of:
    0.08527497 = weight(_text_:van in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08527497 = score(doc=4639,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24466558 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.34853685 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.5765896 = idf(docFreq=454, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    We refine the problem statement into three research questions. The first two focus on the problem of conversion of a vocabulary to a Semantic Web representation from its original format. Conversion of a vocabulary to a representation in a Semantic Web language is necessary to make the vocabulary available to SemanticWeb applications. In the last question we focus on integration of collection metadata schemas in a way that allows for vocabulary representations as produced by our methods. Academisch proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Dutch Research School for Information and Knowledge Systems.
  20. Lindenthal, J.; Scheven, J.E.: ISO 25964 - Standard der Information und Dokumentation (2013) 0.02 
    0.020655802 = product of:
  0.041311603 = sum of:
    0.029365042 = weight(_text_:j in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029365042 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1394085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043873694 = queryNorm
        0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
    0.01194656 = product of:
      0.02389312 = sum of:
        0.02389312 = weight(_text_:den in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02389312 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12575069 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043873694 = queryNorm
            0.19000389 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.866198 = idf(docFreq=6840, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Ein neuer internationaler Standard der Information und Dokumentation - Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies (ISO 25964) ist in Vorbereitung. Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval wurde Mitte August als DIS 25964-1 im ISO Central Secretariat eingereicht. Die Motivation zur Entwicklung eines neuen Vokabularstandards sowie die wesentlichen Änderungen und Erweiterungen gegenüber ISO 2788/ISO 5964 werden vorgestellt. Anhand des Datenmodells zu Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval werden die grundlegenden Elemente, Attribute und Relationen kurz erläutert. Mit der Arbeit an Part 2: Interoperability with other vocabularies wurde Ende Juni 2009 begonnen. Es sollen Richtlinien erarbeitet werden, um Interoperabilität zwischen Thesauri und anderen Vokabularien wie Normdateien für Namen, Schlagwortlisten, Ontologien, Klassifikationen und dgl. zu gewähren. Der erste Commitee Draft (CD 25964-2) ist für Juni 2010 geplant. Über den Stand der Entwicklung des 2. Teiles wird kurz referiert.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 61
  • d 51
  • f 6
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 95
  • el 12
  • m 10
  • x 5
  • n 3
  • s 3
  • r 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications