-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.05
0.04591006 = product of:
0.09182012 = sum of:
0.09182012 = sum of:
0.005071722 = weight(_text_:s in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005071722 = score(doc=590,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.0495451 = weight(_text_:h in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0495451 = score(doc=590,freq=14.0), product of:
0.11370127 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.435748 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.0372033 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0372033 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
- Object
- H-Index
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.1, S.124-125
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.04
0.039677225 = product of:
0.07935445 = sum of:
0.07935445 = sum of:
0.004781665 = weight(_text_:s in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004781665 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.024968384 = weight(_text_:h in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024968384 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11370127 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.049604405 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049604405 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.401-406
-
Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007)
0.04
0.039677225 = product of:
0.07935445 = sum of:
0.07935445 = sum of:
0.004781665 = weight(_text_:s in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004781665 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.024968384 = weight(_text_:h in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024968384 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11370127 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.049604405 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049604405 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30.12.2007 11:22:39
- Pages
- S.341-350
-
Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010)
0.04
0.039064787 = product of:
0.078129575 = sum of:
0.078129575 = sum of:
0.0029885406 = weight(_text_:s in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029885406 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
0.044138286 = weight(_text_:h in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044138286 = score(doc=4147,freq=16.0), product of:
0.11370127 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
0.031002752 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031002752 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This review aims to show, broadly, how the h-index has become a subject of widespread debate, how it has spawned many variants and diverse applications since first introduced in 2005 and some of the issues in its use. Design/methodology/approach - The review drew on a range of material published in 1990 or so sources published since 2005. From these sources, a number of themes were identified and discussed ranging from the h-index's advantages to which citation database might be selected for its calculation. Findings - The analysis shows how the h-index has quickly established itself as a major subject of interest in the field of bibliometrics. Study of the index ranges from its mathematical underpinning to a range of variants perceived to address the indexes' shortcomings. The review illustrates how widely the index has been applied but also how care must be taken in its application. Originality/value - The use of bibliometric indicators to measure research performance continues, with the h-index as its latest addition. The use of the h-index, its variants and many applications to which it has been put are still at the exploratory stage. The review shows the breadth and diversity of this research and the need to verify the veracity of the h-index by more studies.
- Date
- 8. 1.2011 19:22:13
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 66(2010) no.5, S.681-705
-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.04
0.036587298 = product of:
0.073174596 = sum of:
0.073174596 = sum of:
0.009488323 = weight(_text_:s in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009488323 = score(doc=402,freq=14.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.19069082 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.02648297 = weight(_text_:h in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02648297 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11370127 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.0372033 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0372033 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.157-182
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.04
0.03625738 = product of:
0.07251476 = sum of:
0.07251476 = product of:
0.108772136 = sum of:
0.00956333 = weight(_text_:s in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00956333 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.09920881 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09920881 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.04
0.03625738 = product of:
0.07251476 = sum of:
0.07251476 = product of:
0.108772136 = sum of:
0.00956333 = weight(_text_:s in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00956333 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.09920881 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09920881 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008)
0.04
0.036108084 = product of:
0.07221617 = sum of:
0.07221617 = sum of:
0.0029885406 = weight(_text_:s in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029885406 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
0.038224876 = weight(_text_:h in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038224876 = score(doc=2352,freq=12.0), product of:
0.11370127 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.3361869 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
0.031002752 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031002752 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.11, S.1711-1726
-
Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013)
0.03
0.034717575 = product of:
0.06943515 = sum of:
0.06943515 = sum of:
0.004183957 = weight(_text_:s in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004183957 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.021847336 = weight(_text_:h in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021847336 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11370127 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.043403853 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043403853 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 14:04:09
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.1, S.1-8
-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.03
0.032880574 = product of:
0.06576115 = sum of:
0.06576115 = product of:
0.09864172 = sum of:
0.011834018 = weight(_text_:s in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011834018 = score(doc=5666,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.086807705 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.086807705 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
- Pages
- 185 S
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.03
0.031725205 = product of:
0.06345041 = sum of:
0.06345041 = product of:
0.09517562 = sum of:
0.008367914 = weight(_text_:s in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008367914 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.086807705 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.086807705 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.5, S.368-375
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990)
0.03
0.031725205 = product of:
0.06345041 = sum of:
0.06345041 = product of:
0.09517562 = sum of:
0.008367914 = weight(_text_:s in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008367914 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.086807705 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.086807705 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:55
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.5, S.376-386
-
Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998)
0.03
0.031222034 = product of:
0.06244407 = sum of:
0.06244407 = product of:
0.0936661 = sum of:
0.005977081 = weight(_text_:s in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005977081 = score(doc=3690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.08768902 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08768902 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:22:35
- Source
- Scientometrics. 42(1998) no.2, S.259-265
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.03
0.029757919 = product of:
0.059515838 = sum of:
0.059515838 = sum of:
0.0035862487 = weight(_text_:s in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035862487 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.018726287 = weight(_text_:h in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018726287 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11370127 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.0372033 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0372033 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1263-1274
-
Jovanovic, M.: ¬Eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie (2012)
0.03
0.029757919 = product of:
0.059515838 = sum of:
0.059515838 = sum of:
0.0035862487 = weight(_text_:s in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035862487 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.018726287 = weight(_text_:h in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018726287 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11370127 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.0372033 = weight(_text_:22 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0372033 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:23:32
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.2, S.71-80
-
Wan, X.; Liu, F.: Are all literature citations equally important? : automatic citation strength estimation and its applications (2014)
0.03
0.029757919 = product of:
0.059515838 = sum of:
0.059515838 = sum of:
0.0035862487 = weight(_text_:s in 1350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035862487 = score(doc=1350,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1350, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1350)
0.018726287 = weight(_text_:h in 1350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018726287 = score(doc=1350,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11370127 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1350, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1350)
0.0372033 = weight(_text_:22 in 1350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0372033 = score(doc=1350,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1350, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1350)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Literature citation analysis plays a very important role in bibliometrics and scientometrics, such as the Science Citation Index (SCI) impact factor, h-index. Existing citation analysis methods assume that all citations in a paper are equally important, and they simply count the number of citations. Here we argue that the citations in a paper are not equally important and some citations are more important than the others. We use a strength value to assess the importance of each citation and propose to use the regression method with a few useful features for automatically estimating the strength value of each citation. Evaluation results on a manually labeled data set in the computer science field show that the estimated values can achieve good correlation with human-labeled values. We further apply the estimated citation strength values for evaluating paper influence and author influence, and the preliminary evaluation results demonstrate the usefulness of the citation strength values.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:12:35
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1929-1938
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.03
0.029757919 = product of:
0.059515838 = sum of:
0.059515838 = sum of:
0.0035862487 = weight(_text_:s in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035862487 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.018726287 = weight(_text_:h in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018726287 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11370127 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.0372033 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0372033 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1917-1928
-
Ntuli, H.; Inglesi-Lotz, R.; Chang, T.; Pouris, A.: Does research output cause economic growth or vice versa? : evidence from 34 OECD countries (2015)
0.03
0.029757919 = product of:
0.059515838 = sum of:
0.059515838 = sum of:
0.0035862487 = weight(_text_:s in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0035862487 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
0.018726287 = weight(_text_:h in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018726287 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11370127 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
0.0372033 = weight(_text_:22 in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0372033 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 7.2015 22:00:42
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.8, S.1709-1716
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.03
0.027193032 = product of:
0.054386064 = sum of:
0.054386064 = product of:
0.0815791 = sum of:
0.0071724975 = weight(_text_:s in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071724975 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.0744066 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0744066 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
- Source
- Aslib proceedings. 57(2005) no.3, S.200-
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.03
0.027193032 = product of:
0.054386064 = sum of:
0.054386064 = product of:
0.0815791 = sum of:
0.0071724975 = weight(_text_:s in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071724975 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04975763 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.0744066 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0744066 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16026187 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045765184 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.866-867
