Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Kaser, R.T."
  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  1. Kaser, R.T.: If information wants to be free . . . then who's going to pay for it? (2000) 0.03
    0.027853543 = product of:
      0.055707086 = sum of:
        0.055707086 = product of:
          0.11141417 = sum of:
            0.11141417 = weight(_text_:i in 1234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11141417 = score(doc=1234,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04274526 = queryNorm
                0.6910539 = fieldWeight in 1234, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1234)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    I have become "brutally honest" of late, at least according to one listener who heard my remarks during a recent whistle stop speaking tour of publishing conventions. This comment caught me a little off guard. Not that I haven't always been frank, but I do try never to be brutal. The truth, I guess, can be painful, even if the intention of the teller is simply objectivity. This paper is based on a "brutally honest" talk I have been giving to publishers, first, in February, to the Association of American Publishers' Professional and Scholarly Publishing Division, at which point I was calling the piece, "The Illusion of Free Information." It was this initial rendition that led to the invitation to publish something here. Since then I've been working on the talk. I gave a second version of it in March to the assembly of the American Society of Information Dissemination Centers, where I called it, "When Sectors Clash: Public Access vs. Private Interest." And, most recently, I gave yet a third version of it to the governing board of the American Institute of Physics. This time I called it: "The Future of Society Publishing." The notion of free information, our government's proper role in distributing free information, and the future of scholarly publishing in a world of free information . . . these are the issues that are floating around in my head. My goal here is to tell you where my thinking is only at this moment, for I reserve the right to continue thinking and developing new permutations on this mentally challenging theme.