Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Spink, A."
  1. Spink, A.; Greisdorf, H.: Regions and levels : Measuring and mapping users' relevance judgements (2001) 0.01
    0.010366008 = product of:
      0.020732015 = sum of:
        0.020732015 = product of:
          0.031098021 = sum of:
            0.015574021 = weight(_text_:m in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015574021 = score(doc=5586,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
            0.015524 = weight(_text_:h in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015524 = score(doc=5586,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The dichotomous bipolar approach to relevance has produced an abundance of information retrieval (M) research. However, relevance studies that include consideration of users' partial relevance judgments are moving to a greater relevance clarity and congruity to impact the design of more effective [R systems. The study reported in this paper investigates the various regions of across a distribution of users' relevance judgments, including how these regions may be categorized, measured, and evaluated. An instrument was designed using four scales for collecting, measuring, and describing enduser relevance judgments. The instrument was administered to 21 end-users who conducted searches on their own information problems and made relevance judgments on a total of 1059 retrieved items. Findings include: (1) overlapping regions of relevance were found to impact the usefulness of precision ratios as a measure of IR system effectiveness, (2) both positive and negative levels of relevance are important to users as they make relevance judgments, (3) topicality was used more to reject rather than accept items as highly relevant, (4) utility was more used to judge items highly relevant, and (5) the nature of relevance judgment distribution suggested a new IR evaluation measure-median effect. Findings suggest that the middle region of a distribution of relevance judgments, also called "partial relevance," represents a key avenue for ongoing study. The findings provide implications for relevance theory, and the evaluation of IR systems
  2. Spink, A.: Information behavior : an evolutionary instinct (2010) 0.01
    0.008292805 = product of:
      0.01658561 = sum of:
        0.01658561 = product of:
          0.024878416 = sum of:
            0.012459217 = weight(_text_:m in 4313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012459217 = score(doc=4313,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 4313, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4313)
            0.0124192 = weight(_text_:h in 4313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0124192 = score(doc=4313,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 4313, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4313)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.1, S.48 (D. Lewandowski): "... Es ist sehr schade, dass die Autorin aus diesem interessanten und für die Zukunft des Fachs sicherlich entscheidenden Thema nicht mehr gemacht hat. Gerade bei einem Thema, das noch nicht intensiv beackert wurde, ist eine ausführliche Darstellung von großer Bedeutung. Auch in Hinblick auf die Unmenge an Literatur, die in diesem Buch zitiert wird, erscheint die Form der Darstellung in keiner Weise angemessen. Ebenso unangemessen wirkt der Preis von 85 Euro für dieses schmale Werk, welches auch gut in der Form von einem oder zwei längeren Aufsätzen hätte veröffentlicht werden können."
    Type
    m
  3. Griesdorf, H.; Spink, A.: Median measure : an approach to IR systems evaluation (2001) 0.01
    0.007244533 = product of:
      0.014489066 = sum of:
        0.014489066 = product of:
          0.043467198 = sum of:
            0.043467198 = weight(_text_:h in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043467198 = score(doc=1774,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Spink, A.; Greisdorf, H.: Partial relevance judgements and changes in users information problems during online searching (1997) 0.01
    0.0062096 = product of:
      0.0124192 = sum of:
        0.0124192 = product of:
          0.037257597 = sum of:
            0.037257597 = weight(_text_:h in 316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037257597 = score(doc=316,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 316, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=316)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.01
    0.0061682705 = product of:
      0.012336541 = sum of:
        0.012336541 = product of:
          0.037009623 = sum of:
            0.037009623 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037009623 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
  6. Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.: Web searching : public searching of the Web (2004) 0.01
    0.005183004 = product of:
      0.010366008 = sum of:
        0.010366008 = product of:
          0.015549011 = sum of:
            0.0077870106 = weight(_text_:m in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0077870106 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.06873433 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
            0.007762 = weight(_text_:h in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007762 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 56(2004) H.1, S.61-62 (D. Lewandowski): "Die Autoren des vorliegenden Bandes haben sich in den letzten Jahren durch ihre zahlreichen Veröffentlichungen zum Verhalten von Suchmaschinen-Nutzern einen guten Namen gemacht. Das nun erschienene Buch bietet eine Zusammenfassung der verstreut publizierten Aufsätze und stellt deren Ergebnisse in den Kontext eines umfassenderen Forschungsansatzes. Spink und Jansen verwenden zur Analyse des Nutzungsverhaltens query logs von Suchmaschinen. In diesen werden vom Server Informationen protokolliert, die die Anfragen an diesen Server betreffen. Daten, die aus diesen Dateien gewonnen werden können, sind unter anderem die gestellten Suchanfragen, die Adresse des Rechners, von dem aus die Anfrage gestellt wurde, sowie die aus den Trefferlisten ausgewählten Dokumente. Der klare Vorteil der Analyse von Logfiles liegt in der Möglichkeit, große Datenmengen ohne hohen personellen Aufwand erheben zu können. Die Daten einer Vielzahl anonymer Nutzer können analysiert werden; ohne dass dabei die Datenerhebung das Nutzerverhalten beeinflusst. Dies ist bei Suchmaschinen von besonderer Bedeutung, weil sie im Gegensatz zu den meisten anderen professionellen Information-Retrieval-Systemen nicht nur im beruflichen Kontext, sondern auch (und vor allem) privat genutzt werden. Das Bild des Nutzungsverhaltens wird in Umfragen und Laboruntersuchungen verfälscht, weil Nutzer ihr Anfrageverhalten falsch einschätzen oder aber die Themen ihrer Anfragen nicht nennen möchten. Hier ist vor allem an Suchanfragen, die auf medizinische oder pornographische Inhalte gerichtet sind, zu denken. Die Analyse von Logfiles ist allerdings auch mit Problemen behaftet: So sind nicht alle gewünschten Daten überhaupt in den Logfiles enthalten (es fehlen alle Informationen über den einzelnen Nutzer), es werden keine qualitativen Informationen wie etwa der Grund einer Suche erfasst und die Logfiles sind aufgrund technischer Gegebenheiten teils unvollständig. Die Autoren schließen aus den genannten Vor- und Nachteilen, dass sich Logfiles gut für die Auswertung des Nutzerverhaltens eignen, bei der Auswertung jedoch die Ergebnisse von Untersuchungen, welche andere Methoden verwenden, berücksichtigt werden sollten.
    Type
    m
  7. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: ¬A multitasking framework for cognitive information retrieval (2005) 0.00
    0.0041121803 = product of:
      0.008224361 = sum of:
        0.008224361 = product of:
          0.024673082 = sum of:
            0.024673082 = weight(_text_:22 in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024673082 = score(doc=642,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 1.2007 12:55:22
  8. Spink, A.; Greisdorf, H.: Users' partial relevance judgements during online searching (1997) 0.00
    0.0036222665 = product of:
      0.007244533 = sum of:
        0.007244533 = product of:
          0.021733599 = sum of:
            0.021733599 = weight(_text_:h in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021733599 = score(doc=623,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Spink, A.; Park, M.: Information and non-information multitasking interplay (2005) 0.00
    0.0031148044 = product of:
      0.006229609 = sum of:
        0.006229609 = product of:
          0.018688826 = sum of:
            0.018688826 = weight(_text_:m in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018688826 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Spink, A.; Park, M.; Koshman, S.: Factors affecting assigned information problem ordering during Web search : an exploratory study (2006) 0.00
    0.0031148044 = product of:
      0.006229609 = sum of:
        0.006229609 = product of:
          0.018688826 = sum of:
            0.018688826 = weight(_text_:m in 991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018688826 = score(doc=991,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 991, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=991)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Desai, M.; Spink, A.: ¬A algorithm to cluster documents based on relevance (2005) 0.00
    0.0031148044 = product of:
      0.006229609 = sum of:
        0.006229609 = product of:
          0.018688826 = sum of:
            0.018688826 = weight(_text_:m in 1035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018688826 = score(doc=1035,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1035, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1035)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Spink, A.; Bray, K.E.; Jaeckel, M.; Sidberry, G.: Everyday life information-seeking by low-income African American households : Wynnewood Healthy Neighbourhood Project (1999) 0.00
    0.0025956703 = product of:
      0.0051913406 = sum of:
        0.0051913406 = product of:
          0.015574021 = sum of:
            0.015574021 = weight(_text_:m in 282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015574021 = score(doc=282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=282)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Spink, A.; Park, M.; Jansen, B.J.; Pedersen, J.: Elicitation and use of relevance feedback information (2006) 0.00
    0.0025956703 = product of:
      0.0051913406 = sum of:
        0.0051913406 = product of:
          0.015574021 = sum of:
            0.015574021 = weight(_text_:m in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015574021 = score(doc=967,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: ¬An analysis of Web searching by European Allthe Web.com users (2005) 0.00
    0.0025873333 = product of:
      0.0051746666 = sum of:
        0.0051746666 = product of:
          0.015524 = sum of:
            0.015524 = weight(_text_:h in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015524 = score(doc=1015,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Web has become a worldwide source of information and a mainstream business tool. It is changing the way people conduct the daily business of their lives. As these changes are occurring, we need to understand what Web searching trends are emerging within the various global regions. What are the regional differences and trends in Web searching, if any? What is the effectiveness of Web search engines as providers of information? As part of a body of research studying these questions, we have analyzed two data sets collected from queries by mainly European users submitted to AlltheWeb.com on 6 February 2001 and 28 May 2002. AlltheWeb.com is a major and highly rated European search engine. Each data set contains approximately a million queries submitted by over 200,000 users and spans a 24-h period. This longitudinal benchmark study shows that European Web searching is evolving in certain directions. There was some decline in query length, with extremely simple queries. European search topics are broadening, with a notable percentage decline in sexual and pornographic searching. The majority of Web searchers view fewer than five Web documents, spending only seconds on a Web document. Approximately 50% of the Web documents viewed by these European users were topically relevant. We discuss the implications for Web information systems and information content providers.
  15. Reneker, M.; Jacobson, A.; Wargo, L.; Spink, A.: Information environment of a military university campus : an exploratory study (1999) 0.00
    0.0020765362 = product of:
      0.0041530724 = sum of:
        0.0041530724 = product of:
          0.012459217 = sum of:
            0.012459217 = weight(_text_:m in 6704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012459217 = score(doc=6704,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 6704, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6704)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)