Search (527 results, page 1 of 27)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.05
    0.0495515 = product of:
      0.099103 = sum of:
        0.099103 = sum of:
          0.024918433 = weight(_text_:m in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024918433 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.0248384 = weight(_text_:h in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0248384 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.049346164 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049346164 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.401-406
  2. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010) 0.05
    0.04516194 = product of:
      0.09032388 = sum of:
        0.09032388 = sum of:
          0.015574021 = weight(_text_:m in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015574021 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
          0.043908503 = weight(_text_:h in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043908503 = score(doc=4147,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
          0.030841354 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030841354 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This review aims to show, broadly, how the h-index has become a subject of widespread debate, how it has spawned many variants and diverse applications since first introduced in 2005 and some of the issues in its use. Design/methodology/approach - The review drew on a range of material published in 1990 or so sources published since 2005. From these sources, a number of themes were identified and discussed ranging from the h-index's advantages to which citation database might be selected for its calculation. Findings - The analysis shows how the h-index has quickly established itself as a major subject of interest in the field of bibliometrics. Study of the index ranges from its mathematical underpinning to a range of variants perceived to address the indexes' shortcomings. The review illustrates how widely the index has been applied but also how care must be taken in its application. Originality/value - The use of bibliometric indicators to measure research performance continues, with the h-index as its latest addition. The use of the h-index, its variants and many applications to which it has been put are still at the exploratory stage. The review shows the breadth and diversity of this research and the need to verify the veracity of the h-index by more studies.
    Date
    8. 1.2011 19:22:13
    Object
    h-index
  3. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.04
    0.044892356 = product of:
      0.08978471 = sum of:
        0.08978471 = sum of:
          0.02642999 = weight(_text_:m in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02642999 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.0263451 = weight(_text_:h in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0263451 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.037009623 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037009623 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.157-182
  4. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.04
    0.043321013 = product of:
      0.08664203 = sum of:
        0.08664203 = product of:
          0.12996304 = sum of:
            0.043607257 = weight(_text_:m in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043607257 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
            0.08635579 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08635579 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
    Type
    m
  5. Jovanovic, M.: ¬Eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie (2012) 0.04
    0.037163623 = product of:
      0.074327245 = sum of:
        0.074327245 = sum of:
          0.018688826 = weight(_text_:m in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018688826 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
          0.018628798 = weight(_text_:h in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018628798 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
          0.037009623 = weight(_text_:22 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037009623 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:23:32
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.2, S.71-80
  6. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.04
    0.037163623 = product of:
      0.074327245 = sum of:
        0.074327245 = sum of:
          0.018688826 = weight(_text_:m in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018688826 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.018628798 = weight(_text_:h in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018628798 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.037009623 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037009623 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29
  7. Chang, Y.-W.; Huang, M.-H.: ¬A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science : using three bibliometric methods (2012) 0.03
    0.030969687 = product of:
      0.061939374 = sum of:
        0.061939374 = sum of:
          0.015574021 = weight(_text_:m in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015574021 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
          0.015524 = weight(_text_:h in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015524 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
          0.030841354 = weight(_text_:22 in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030841354 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04552693 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.22-33
  8. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.03
    0.0287656 = product of:
      0.0575312 = sum of:
        0.0575312 = product of:
          0.0862968 = sum of:
            0.04928717 = weight(_text_:h in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04928717 = score(doc=590,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.435748 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
            0.037009623 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037009623 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
    Object
    H-Index
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.1, S.124-125
  9. Gerdel, W.: Datentechnische Methoden in der Referenzanalyse (1980) 0.02
    0.024878418 = product of:
      0.049756836 = sum of:
        0.049756836 = product of:
          0.07463525 = sum of:
            0.03737765 = weight(_text_:m in 7571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03737765 = score(doc=7571,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 7571, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7571)
            0.037257597 = weight(_text_:h in 7571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037257597 = score(doc=7571,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 7571, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7571)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  10. Eisenhardt, O.; Ohly, P.: Quantitative Analyse und Suchstrategien (1981) 0.02
    0.024878418 = product of:
      0.049756836 = sum of:
        0.049756836 = product of:
          0.07463525 = sum of:
            0.03737765 = weight(_text_:m in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03737765 = score(doc=36,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
            0.037257597 = weight(_text_:h in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037257597 = score(doc=36,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  11. Nacke, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne (1980) 0.02
    0.024878418 = product of:
      0.049756836 = sum of:
        0.049756836 = product of:
          0.07463525 = sum of:
            0.03737765 = weight(_text_:m in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03737765 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
            0.037257597 = weight(_text_:h in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037257597 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  12. Nacke, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse (1980) 0.02
    0.024878418 = product of:
      0.049756836 = sum of:
        0.049756836 = product of:
          0.07463525 = sum of:
            0.03737765 = weight(_text_:m in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03737765 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
            0.037257597 = weight(_text_:h in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037257597 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  13. Eisenhardt, O.H.: Ergebnisse der Referenzanalyse (1980) 0.02
    0.024878418 = product of:
      0.049756836 = sum of:
        0.049756836 = product of:
          0.07463525 = sum of:
            0.03737765 = weight(_text_:m in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03737765 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
            0.037257597 = weight(_text_:h in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037257597 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  14. Henzler, R.: Bibliometrische Methoden der Termanalyse (1980) 0.02
    0.024878418 = product of:
      0.049756836 = sum of:
        0.049756836 = product of:
          0.07463525 = sum of:
            0.03737765 = weight(_text_:m in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03737765 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
            0.037257597 = weight(_text_:h in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037257597 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  15. Wersig, G.: Quantitative Methoden der Benutzerforschung (1981) 0.02
    0.024878418 = product of:
      0.049756836 = sum of:
        0.049756836 = product of:
          0.07463525 = sum of:
            0.03737765 = weight(_text_:m in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03737765 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
            0.037257597 = weight(_text_:h in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037257597 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  16. Hunter, J.A.: Quantifizierbare Merkmale von Datenbanken (1981) 0.02
    0.024878418 = product of:
      0.049756836 = sum of:
        0.049756836 = product of:
          0.07463525 = sum of:
            0.03737765 = weight(_text_:m in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03737765 = score(doc=416,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
            0.037257597 = weight(_text_:h in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037257597 = score(doc=416,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  17. Springer, M.: Erlahmt die Forschung? (2023) 0.02
    0.024878418 = product of:
      0.049756836 = sum of:
        0.049756836 = product of:
          0.07463525 = sum of:
            0.03737765 = weight(_text_:m in 985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03737765 = score(doc=985,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 985, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=985)
            0.037257597 = weight(_text_:h in 985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037257597 = score(doc=985,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 985, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=985)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.3, S.30
  18. Schreiber, M.: Restricting the h-index to a citation time window : a case study of a timed Hirsch index (2014) 0.02
    0.024865076 = product of:
      0.049730152 = sum of:
        0.049730152 = product of:
          0.07459523 = sum of:
            0.024918433 = weight(_text_:m in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024918433 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
            0.0496768 = weight(_text_:h in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0496768 = score(doc=1563,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The h-index has been shown to increase in many cases mostly because of citations to rather old publications. This inertia can be circumvented by restricting the evaluation to a citation time window. Here I report results of an empirical study analyzing the evolution of the thus defined timed h-index in dependence on the length of the citation time window.
    Object
    h-index
  19. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.02
    0.024754867 = product of:
      0.049509734 = sum of:
        0.049509734 = product of:
          0.0742646 = sum of:
            0.024918433 = weight(_text_:m in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024918433 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
            0.049346164 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049346164 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
    Type
    m
  20. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.02
    0.02472819 = product of:
      0.04945638 = sum of:
        0.04945638 = product of:
          0.07418457 = sum of:
            0.0248384 = weight(_text_:h in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0248384 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
            0.049346164 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049346164 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04552693 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39

Languages

  • e 430
  • d 90
  • chi 2
  • ? 1
  • m 1
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 494
  • m 25
  • el 11
  • s 6
  • r 2
  • b 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…