Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Drabenstott, K.M."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Drabenstott, K.M.; Burman, C.M.: Analytical review of the library of the future (1994) 0.02
    0.019381378 = product of:
      0.038762756 = sum of:
        0.038762756 = product of:
          0.11628826 = sum of:
            0.11628826 = weight(_text_:v in 3658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11628826 = score(doc=3658,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044352535 = queryNorm
                0.5382217 = fieldWeight in 3658, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3658)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    V,200 S
  2. Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: ¬A comparative approach to system evaluation : delegating control of retrieval tests to an experimental online system (1996) 0.01
    0.008302405 = product of:
      0.01660481 = sum of:
        0.01660481 = product of:
          0.049814425 = sum of:
            0.049814425 = weight(_text_:w in 7435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049814425 = score(doc=7435,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1690189 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044352535 = queryNorm
                0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 7435, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7435)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the comparative approach to system evaluation used in this research project which delegated the administartion of an online retrieval test to an experimental online catalogue to produce data for evaluating the effectiveness of a new subject access design. Describes the methods enlisted to sort out problem test administration, e.g. to identify out-of-scope queries, incomplete system administration, and suspect post-search questionnaire responses. Covers how w the researchers handled problem search administrations and what actions they would use to reduce or eliminate the occurrence of such administrations in future online retrieval tests that delegate control of retrieval tests to online systems
  3. Drabenstott, K.M.; Simcox, S.; Fenton, E.G.: End-user understanding of subject headings in library catalogs (1999) 0.01
    0.006009157 = product of:
      0.012018314 = sum of:
        0.012018314 = product of:
          0.03605494 = sum of:
            0.03605494 = weight(_text_:22 in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03605494 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15531503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044352535 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22