-
Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007)
0.05
0.04703462 = product of:
0.09406924 = sum of:
0.09406924 = product of:
0.14110386 = sum of:
0.09303061 = weight(_text_:v in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09303061 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.43057737 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.04807325 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04807325 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15531503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30.12.2007 11:22:39
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.04
0.040254116 = product of:
0.08050823 = sum of:
0.08050823 = product of:
0.12076235 = sum of:
0.06977296 = weight(_text_:v in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06977296 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.050989386 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050989386 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15531503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.03
0.026251007 = product of:
0.052502014 = sum of:
0.052502014 = product of:
0.07875302 = sum of:
0.042698078 = weight(_text_:w in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042698078 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1690189 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.03605494 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03605494 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15531503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
Glänzel, W.; Moed, H.F.: Journal impact measures in bibliometric research (2002)
0.02
0.01660481 = product of:
0.03320962 = sum of:
0.03320962 = product of:
0.09962885 = sum of:
0.09962885 = weight(_text_:w in 2904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09962885 = score(doc=2904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1690189 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.58945394 = fieldWeight in 2904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2904)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.016024418 = product of:
0.032048836 = sum of:
0.032048836 = product of:
0.0961465 = sum of:
0.0961465 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0961465 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15531503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Pernik, V.; Schlögl, C.: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Web Structure Mining am Beispiel von informationswissenschaftlichen Hochschulinstituten im deutschsprachigen Raum (2006)
0.02
0.0155051015 = product of:
0.031010203 = sum of:
0.031010203 = product of:
0.09303061 = sum of:
0.09303061 = weight(_text_:v in 78) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09303061 = score(doc=78,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.43057737 = fieldWeight in 78, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=78)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.014163718 = product of:
0.028327435 = sum of:
0.028327435 = product of:
0.084982306 = sum of:
0.084982306 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084982306 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15531503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Larivière, V.; Archambault, V.; Gingras, Y.; Vignola-Gagné, E.: ¬The place of serials in referencing practices : comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities (2006)
0.01
0.013704704 = product of:
0.027409408 = sum of:
0.027409408 = product of:
0.08222822 = sum of:
0.08222822 = weight(_text_:v in 5107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08222822 = score(doc=5107,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.38058025 = fieldWeight in 5107, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5107)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Pulgarin, A.; Gil-Leiva, I.: Bibliometric analysis of the automatic indexing literature : 1956-2000 (2004)
0.01
0.013566965 = product of:
0.02713393 = sum of:
0.02713393 = product of:
0.08140179 = sum of:
0.08140179 = weight(_text_:v in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08140179 = score(doc=2566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2566)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We present a bibliometric study of a corpus of 839 bibliographic references about automatic indexing, covering the period 1956-2000. We analyse the distribution of authors and works, the obsolescence and its dispersion, and the distribution of the literature by topic, year, and source type. We conclude that: (i) there has been a constant interest on the part of researchers; (ii) the most studied topics were the techniques and methods employed and the general aspects of automatic indexing; (iii) the productivity of the authors does fit a Lotka distribution (Dmax=0.02 and critical value=0.054); (iv) the annual aging factor is 95%; and (v) the dispersion of the literature is low.
-
Cothey, V.: Web-crawling reliability (2004)
0.01
0.013566965 = product of:
0.02713393 = sum of:
0.02713393 = product of:
0.08140179 = sum of:
0.08140179 = weight(_text_:v in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08140179 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Della Mea, V.; Demartini, G.; Di Gaspero, L.; Mizzaro, S.: Measuring retrieval effectiveness with Average Distance Measure (ADM) (2006)
0.01
0.013566965 = product of:
0.02713393 = sum of:
0.02713393 = product of:
0.08140179 = sum of:
0.08140179 = weight(_text_:v in 774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08140179 = score(doc=774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.3767552 = fieldWeight in 774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=774)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Petersen, A.; Münch, V.: STN® AnaVist(TM) holt verborgenes Wissen aus Recherche-Ergebnissen : Neue Software analysiert und visualisiert Marktaufteilung, Forschung und Patentaktivitäten (2005)
0.01
0.0134278145 = product of:
0.026855629 = sum of:
0.026855629 = product of:
0.08056688 = sum of:
0.08056688 = weight(_text_:v in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08056688 = score(doc=3984,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.37289098 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- "Im 21. Jahrhundert ist die entscheidende Herausforderung an Informationsdienstleister nicht, Informationen zugänglich, sondern sie optimal nutzbar zu machen", sagt Sabine Brünger-Weilandt, Geschäftsführerin von FIZ Karlsruhe, das den Online-Dienst STN International in internationaler Kooperation betreibt. Informationsprofis, so Brünger-Weilandt weiter, bräuchten hockentwickelte Software für strategisches Informationsmanagement. Als "Antwort auf diesen Bedarf" hat STN International eine neue Software zur Analyse und Visualisierung (A&V) von Rechercheergebnissen aus STN-Datenbanken entwickelt. STN® AnaVistT(TM) wurde auf der DGI Online-Tagung Ende Mai in Frankfurt am Main und auf Benutzertreffen in Frankfurt am Main, München und Essen vorgestellt. Seit 18. Juli 2005 ist das neue A&V-Werkzeug für die öffentliche Nutzung freigegeben (www.stn-international.de).
-
Jacso, P.: Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster (2008)
0.01
0.01326053 = product of:
0.02652106 = sum of:
0.02652106 = product of:
0.07956318 = sum of:
0.07956318 = weight(_text_:w in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07956318 = score(doc=5586,freq=10.0), product of:
0.1690189 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.4707354 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper focuses on the practical limitations in the content and software of the databases that are used to calculate the h-index for assessing the publishing productivity and impact of researchers. To celebrate F. W. Lancaster's biological age of seventy-five, and "scientific age" of forty-five, this paper discusses the related features of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS), and demonstrates in the latter how a much more realistic and fair h-index can be computed for F. W. Lancaster than the one produced automatically. Browsing and searching the cited reference index of the 1945-2007 edition of WoS, which in my estimate has over a hundred million "orphan references" that have no counterpart master records to be attached to, and "stray references" that cite papers which do have master records but cannot be identified by the matching algorithm because of errors of omission and commission in the references of the citing works, can bring up hundreds of additional cited references given to works of an accomplished author but are ignored in the automatic process of calculating the h-index. The partially manual process doubled the h-index value for F. W. Lancaster from 13 to 26, which is a much more realistic value for an information scientist and professor of his stature.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft 'The Influence of F. W. Lancaster on Information Science and on Libraries', das als Festschrift für F.W. Lancaster deklariert ist.
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.01
0.012018314 = product of:
0.024036627 = sum of:
0.024036627 = product of:
0.07210988 = sum of:
0.07210988 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07210988 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15531503 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
-
Aris, A.; Shneiderman, B.; Qazvinian, V.; Radev, D.: Visual overviews for discovering key papers and influences across research fronts (2009)
0.01
0.011628827 = product of:
0.023257654 = sum of:
0.023257654 = product of:
0.06977296 = sum of:
0.06977296 = weight(_text_:v in 3156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06977296 = score(doc=3156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 3156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3156)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kuperman, V.: Productivity in the Internet mailing lists : a bibliometric analysis (2006)
0.01
0.009690689 = product of:
0.019381378 = sum of:
0.019381378 = product of:
0.05814413 = sum of:
0.05814413 = weight(_text_:v in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05814413 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Larivière, V.; Archambault, E.; Gingras, Y.: Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature : from exponential growth to steady-state science (1900-2004) (2008)
0.01
0.009690689 = product of:
0.019381378 = sum of:
0.019381378 = product of:
0.05814413 = sum of:
0.05814413 = weight(_text_:v in 1357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05814413 = score(doc=1357,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 1357, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1357)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Lisée, C.; Larivière, V.; Archambault, E.: Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information : a bibliometric analysis (2008)
0.01
0.009690689 = product of:
0.019381378 = sum of:
0.019381378 = product of:
0.05814413 = sum of:
0.05814413 = weight(_text_:v in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05814413 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wallace, M.L.; Gingras, Y.; Duhon, R.: ¬A new approach for detecting scientific specialties from raw cocitation networks (2009)
0.01
0.009690689 = product of:
0.019381378 = sum of:
0.019381378 = product of:
0.05814413 = sum of:
0.05814413 = weight(_text_:v in 2709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05814413 = score(doc=2709,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 2709, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2709)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We use a technique recently developed by V. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre (2008) to detect scientific specialties from author cocitation networks. This algorithm has distinct advantages over most previous methods used to obtain cocitation clusters since it avoids the use of similarity measures, relies entirely on the topology of the weighted network, and can be applied to relatively large networks. Most importantly, it requires no subjective interpretation of the cocitation data or of the communities found. Using two examples, we show that the resulting specialties are the smallest coherent groups of researchers (within a hierarchy of cluster sizes) and can thus be identified unambiguously. Furthermore, we confirm that these communities are indeed representative of what we know about the structure of a given scientific discipline and that as specialties, they can be accurately characterized by a few keywords (from the publication titles). We argue that this robust and efficient algorithm is particularly well-suited to cocitation networks and that the results generated can be of great use to researchers studying various facets of the structure and evolution of science.
-
Archambault, E.; Campbell, D; Gingras, Y.; Larivière, V.: Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus (2009)
0.01
0.009690689 = product of:
0.019381378 = sum of:
0.019381378 = product of:
0.05814413 = sum of:
0.05814413 = weight(_text_:v in 2933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05814413 = score(doc=2933,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21606015 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.044352535 = queryNorm
0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 2933, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2933)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
