Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"06.35 Informationsmanagement"
  1. Knowledge organization for a global learning society : Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria (2006) 0.02 
    0.02410884 = product of:
  0.04821768 = sum of:
    0.04821768 = sum of:
      0.033005226 = weight(_text_:c in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033005226 = score(doc=2514,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037426826 = queryNorm
          0.2556557 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.015212455 = weight(_text_:22 in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.015212455 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037426826 = queryNorm
          0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Zins, C.: Knowledge map of information science: issues, principles, implications. - Lin, X., S. Aluker u. W. Zhu u.a.: Dynamic concept representation through a visual concept explorer. - Kohlbacher, F.: Knowledge organization(s) in Japan: empirical evidence from Japanese and western corporations. - Beghtol, C.: The global learning society and the iterative relationship between theory and practice in knowledge organization systems. - Tennis, J.T.: Function, purpose, predication, and context of information organization frameworks. - Doyle, A.: Naming and reclaiming knowledges in public intersections of landscapes and experience. - Qin, J., P. Creticos u. W.Y. Hsiao: Adaptive modeling of workforce domain knowledge. - Gnoli, C.: The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications. - Loehrlein, A., E.K. Jacob u. S. Lee u.a.: Development of heuristics in a hybrid approach to faceted classification. - Thellefsen, M.: The dynamics of information representation and knowledge mediation. - LaBarre, K.: A multi faceted view: use of facet analysis in the practice of website organization and access. - Smiraglia, R.P.: Empiricism as the basis for metadata categorisation: expanding the case for instantiation with archival documents. - Bean, C.A.: Hierarchical relationships used in mapping between knowledge structures. - Friedman, A.: Concept mapping a measurable sign. - Naumis Pena, C.: Evaluation of educational thesauri. - Biagetti, M.T.: Indexing and scientific research needs. - Robert, C.A., A. Davis: Annotation and its application to information research in economic intelligence. - Mcllwaine, I.C., J.S. Mitchel: The new ecumenism: exploration of a DDC / UDC view of religion. - Hajdu Barát, A.: Usability and the user interfaces of classical information retrieval languages. - Eito Brun, R.: Uncovering hidden clues about geographic visualization in LCC. - Williamson, N.J.: Knowledge structures and the Internet progress and prospects. - Pajarillo, E.J.Y.: A classification scheme to determine medical necessity: a knowledge organization global learning application. - López-Huertas, M.J.: Thematic map of interdisciplinary domains based on their terminological representation: the gender studies. - Rodriguez Bravo, B.: The visibility of women in indexing languages. - Beall, J., D. Vizine-Goetz: Finding fiction: facilitating access to works of the imagination scattered by form and format. - Kwasnik, B.H., Y.L. Chun u. K. Crowston u.a.: Challenges in ceating a taxonomy of genres of digital documents. - Simon, J.: Interdisciplinary knowledge creation: using wikis in science. - Gabel, J.: Improving information retrieval of subjects through citation-analysis: a study. - Lee, H.L.: Navigating hierarchies vs. searching by keyword: two cultural perspectives. - Loehrlein, A., R. Martin u. E.L. Robertson: Integration of international standards in the domain of manufacturing enterprise. -
    Date
    27.12.2008 11:22:36
    Editor
    Budin, G. C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  2. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.01 
    0.010141637 = product of:
  0.020283274 = sum of:
    0.020283274 = product of:
      0.04056655 = sum of:
        0.04056655 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04056655 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
  3. Dominich, S.: Mathematical foundations of information retrieval (2001) 0.01 
    0.0063385232 = product of:
  0.0126770465 = sum of:
    0.0126770465 = product of:
      0.025354093 = sum of:
        0.025354093 = weight(_text_:22 in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025354093 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 12:26:32
  4. Borgman, C.L.: Big data, little data, no data : scholarship in the networked world (2015) 0.00 
    0.0049201283 = product of:
  0.009840257 = sum of:
    0.009840257 = product of:
      0.019680513 = sum of:
        0.019680513 = weight(_text_:c in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019680513 = score(doc=2785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Weitere Rez. in: JASIST 67(2016) no.3, S.751-753 (C. Tenopir).
  5. Ratzek, W.: Schwarze Löcher : Im Sog der Informations- und Wissensindustrie (2005) 0.00 
    0.0030750802 = product of:
  0.0061501605 = sum of:
    0.0061501605 = product of:
      0.012300321 = sum of:
        0.012300321 = weight(_text_:c in 1433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012300321 = score(doc=1433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.09527725 = fieldWeight in 1433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1433)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    1. in wörtlicher Bedeutung heißt Information also das Versehen von etwas in einer Form, Gestaltgebung 2. in übertragenem Sinne heißt Information genau das gleiche wie unser Wort Bildung welches gleichfalls übertragen gebraucht wird... informatio als Bildung differenziert sich nun wieder in zwei Unterbedeutungen: a) Bildung durch Unterrichtung aa) informatio als Vorgang und ab) informatio als Ergebnis Zur Problematik zwischen Information und Wissen führt er auch die US-Zukunftsforscher Matthias Horx und den alten weisen Josef Weizenbaum an. Dessen scharfe und pointierte Kritik an der Internet-Euphorie liest man heute noch mit Vergnügen. Damit wird einer allzu simplen nationalen Zuweisungen von Vorlieben für Informationswirtschaft als "typisch amerikanisch" und allen kritiklosen Adepten einer Computergläubigkeit eine Absage erteilt. (S.41/42). Es ist erstaunlich, dass es Ratzek gelingt, den thematischen Umfang des Buches in nur drei großen Abschnitten unterzubringen, die er Teil A: Grundlagen, Teil B: Techniksynopse und Teil C: Visionen nennt. Die unter diesen Teilen aufgeführten Kapitel folgen ohne Abweichungen den vorgegebenen Themen. Die knapp gehaltenen Zusammenfassungen werden von sehr klaren und anschaulichen Grafiken unterstrichen. Um diese sehr stringente Einteilung nicht zu unterbrechen, gibt es bisweilen Exkurse, die kleine historische oder auch philosophische Ausflüge erlauben. Dies ist notwendig, denn Ratzek versucht nicht nur die von ihm vorgegebene Problematik immer wieder aufzunehmen, sondern er will diese auch auf allen Feldern der Informationstechnologie exemplifizieren. Dazu gehören nicht nur die Informationstechnologie und ihre diversen Apparate sowie die Netzwerke wie Telefon und Fernsehen, die letztendlich zu dem immer wieder durchscheinenden Credo des Autors führen: "...weil es eine Pflicht für Informationswissenschaftler ist, zu denen der Autor gehört, diesen Unterschied zu erkennen und darauf hinzuweisen, dass nicht die Informatisierung der Gesellschaft und Wirtschaft das Ziel sein kann, sondern der sinnvolle Umgang mit Information und Wissen." (S.177)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications