-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.06
0.060774364 = product of:
0.12154873 = sum of:
0.12154873 = sum of:
0.029968852 = weight(_text_:j in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029968852 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.055180833 = weight(_text_:n in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055180833 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.03639904 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03639904 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.06
0.05899369 = product of:
0.11798738 = sum of:
0.11798738 = product of:
0.17698106 = sum of:
0.07991694 = weight(_text_:j in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07991694 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.097064115 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097064115 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Umstätter, W.: Szientometrische Verfahren (2004)
0.04
0.03683788 = product of:
0.07367576 = sum of:
0.07367576 = product of:
0.110513635 = sum of:
0.028254904 = weight(_text_:j in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028254904 = score(doc=2920,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.19859353 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
0.08225873 = weight(_text_:n in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08225873 = score(doc=2920,freq=10.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.42608297 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die Szientometrie beschäftigt sich mit der Messbarkeit wissenschaftlicher Leistungen anhand bibliothekarisch nachweisbarer Publikationsergebnisse. Bei genauer Betrachtung ist es ihr Ziel, die Wissenszunahme der Wissenschaft zu messen. Die wissenschaftliche Produktion in Form von Publikationen wächst seit über dreihundert Jahren konstant mit ca. 3,5% pro Jahr. Das entspricht einerVerdopplungsrate von 20 Jahren, die zuerst dem Bibliothekar Fremont Rider 1948 bei Büchern auffiel und die 1963 von Derek J. de Solla Price auch für das Wachstum von Zeitschriften und Bibliografien bestätigt wurde. Die Konstanz dieser Evolution, unabhängig aller sich ereignenden Katastrophen, ist nur zum Teil verstanden, macht aber den unaufhaltsamen Fortschritt der Wissenschaft deutlich. Alle 20 Jahre wird so viel publiziert wie in allen Jahrhunderten davor. Eine etwa gleiche Zunahme verzeichnen die Wissenschaftler, die damit etwa gleich produktiv bleiben. Von ihnen allen sind damit ca. 87% unsere heutigen Zeitgenossen. Aus diesem Wachstum heraus können wir abschätzen, dass in 100.000 laufenden Zeitschriften heute etwa 10 Mio. Publikationen jährlich erscheinen, die von 10 Mio. Wissenschaftlern verfasst werden. Dabei definieren sich nur die als Wissenschaftler, die durchschnittlich eine Publikation jährlich verfassen. Die gesamte Produktion an Buchtiteln, die bisher erschien, dürfte bei etwa 100 Mio. liegen. Davon sind etwa 20 Mio. als wissenschaftlich einzustufen. Wenn folglich 87% aller Wissenschaftler noch heute leben, so betrug die Gesamtzahl der Wissenschaftler in der Welt bisher 11,5 Mio., die in ihrem Leben durchschnittlich 1,5 Bücher pro Kopf verfassten, und etwa das 10-20fache an Zeitschriftenbeiträgen leisteten. Ein Teil dieser Bücher sind allerdings Neuauflagen und Übersetzungen. Nach Lotka, A. J. ist die Produktivität der Wissenschaftler eine schiefe Verteilung von der Form A/n**2, wobei A die Zahl der Autoren mit nur einer Publikation ist und n die Publikationen pro Autor. Während Price in seinen "Networks of Scientific Papers" Vergleichswerte von n**2,5 bis n**3 angab, zeigten Untersuchungen am Science Citation Index (SCI), die auf die gesamte naturwissenschaftliche Literatur hochgerechnet wurden, eher einen Wert von n**1,7. Auf die Tatsache, dass eine Verdopplungsrate der Wissenschaftler von 20 Jahren und eine solche der Menschheit von etwa 50 Jahren dazu führt, dass eines Tages alle Menschen Wissenschaftler werden, hat Price bereits 1963 hingewiesen. Dieser Zustand müsste bei 10 Mio. Wissenschaftlern und 6 Mrd. Menschen in etwa 300 Jahren eintreten, ein nur scheinbar absurder Gedanke, wenn man bedenkt, dass man sich vor 300 Jahren auch kaum vorstellen konnte, dass alle Menschen Lesen, Schreiben und Rechnen lernen können, und dass wir uns ungebildete Menschen immer weniger leisten können.
-
Jacobs, N.; Woodfield, J.; Morris, A.: Using local citation data to relate the use of journal articles by academic researchers to the coverage of full-text document access systems (2000)
0.03
0.028383229 = product of:
0.056766458 = sum of:
0.056766458 = product of:
0.08514968 = sum of:
0.029968852 = weight(_text_:j in 4541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029968852 = score(doc=4541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4541)
0.055180833 = weight(_text_:n in 4541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055180833 = score(doc=4541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 4541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4541)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Klitzing, N.; Hoekstra, R.; Strijbos, J.-W,: Literature practices : processes leading up to a citation (2019)
0.02
0.023652691 = product of:
0.047305383 = sum of:
0.047305383 = product of:
0.07095807 = sum of:
0.024974043 = weight(_text_:j in 4628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024974043 = score(doc=4628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4628)
0.045984026 = weight(_text_:n in 4628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045984026 = score(doc=4628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 4628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4628)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.02
0.022122633 = product of:
0.044245265 = sum of:
0.044245265 = product of:
0.066367894 = sum of:
0.029968852 = weight(_text_:j in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029968852 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.03639904 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03639904 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008)
0.02
0.018922154 = product of:
0.037844308 = sum of:
0.037844308 = product of:
0.056766458 = sum of:
0.019979235 = weight(_text_:j in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019979235 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
0.036787223 = weight(_text_:n in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036787223 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.19055009 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.02
0.016177353 = product of:
0.032354705 = sum of:
0.032354705 = product of:
0.097064115 = sum of:
0.097064115 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097064115 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.014298895 = product of:
0.02859779 = sum of:
0.02859779 = product of:
0.08579337 = sum of:
0.08579337 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08579337 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Gorraiz, J.: ¬Die unerträgliche Bedeutung der Zitate (1992)
0.01
0.0133194905 = product of:
0.026638981 = sum of:
0.026638981 = product of:
0.07991694 = sum of:
0.07991694 = weight(_text_:j in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07991694 = score(doc=2824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002)
0.01
0.011535017 = product of:
0.023070034 = sum of:
0.023070034 = product of:
0.0692101 = sum of:
0.0692101 = weight(_text_:j in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0692101 = score(doc=3765,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.48645282 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures (2002)
0.01
0.010729606 = product of:
0.021459213 = sum of:
0.021459213 = product of:
0.064377636 = sum of:
0.064377636 = weight(_text_:n in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064377636 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Can the inclusion of new journals in the Science Citation Index be used for the indication of structural change in the database, and how can this change be compared with reorganizations of reiations among previously included journals? Change in the number of journals (n) is distinguished from change in the number of journal categories (m). Although the number of journals can be considered as a given at each moment in time, the number of journal categories is based an a reconstruction that is time-stamped ex post. The reflexive reconstruction is in need of an update when new information becomes available in a next year. Implications of this shift towards an evolutionary perspective are specified.
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.01
0.010110846 = product of:
0.020221692 = sum of:
0.020221692 = product of:
0.06066507 = sum of:
0.06066507 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06066507 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Sombatsompop, N.; Markpin, T.: Making an equality of ISI impact factors for different subject fields (2005)
0.01
0.009196806 = product of:
0.018393612 = sum of:
0.018393612 = product of:
0.055180833 = sum of:
0.055180833 = weight(_text_:n in 3467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055180833 = score(doc=3467,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 3467, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3467)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Shibata, N.; Kajikawa, Y.; Matsushima, K.: Topological analysis of citation networks to discover the future core articles (2007)
0.01
0.009196806 = product of:
0.018393612 = sum of:
0.018393612 = product of:
0.055180833 = sum of:
0.055180833 = weight(_text_:n in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055180833 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review : a citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008)
0.01
0.008670832 = product of:
0.017341664 = sum of:
0.017341664 = product of:
0.05202499 = sum of:
0.05202499 = weight(_text_:n in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05202499 = score(doc=2381,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.26947853 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- All journals that use peer review have to deal with the following question: Does the peer review system fulfill its declared objective to select the best scientific work? We investigated the journal peer-review process at Angewandte Chemie International Edition (AC-IE), one of the prime chemistry journals worldwide, and conducted a citation analysis for Communications that were accepted by the journal (n = 878) or rejected but published elsewhere (n = 959). The results of negative binomial-regression models show that holding all other model variables constant, being accepted by AC-IE increases the expected number of citations by up to 50%. A comparison of average citation counts (with 95% confidence intervals) of accepted and rejected (but published elsewhere) Communications with international scientific reference standards was undertaken. As reference standards, (a) mean citation counts for the journal set provided by Thomson Reuters corresponding to the field chemistry and (b) specific reference standards that refer to the subject areas of Chemical Abstracts were used. When compared to reference standards, the mean impact on chemical research is for the most part far above average not only for accepted Communications but also for rejected (but published elsewhere) Communications. However, average and below-average scientific impact is to be expected significantly less frequently for accepted Communications than for rejected Communications. All in all, the results of this study confirm that peer review at AC-IE is able to select the best scientific work with the highest impact on chemical research.
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.008579338 = product of:
0.017158676 = sum of:
0.017158676 = product of:
0.051476024 = sum of:
0.051476024 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051476024 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998)
0.01
0.008324681 = product of:
0.016649362 = sum of:
0.016649362 = product of:
0.049948085 = sum of:
0.049948085 = weight(_text_:j in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049948085 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 50(1999) no.13, S.1259-1261 (J. Andersen)
-
Fröhlich, G.: ¬Das Messen des leicht Meßbaren : Output-Indikatoren, Impact-Maße: Artefakte der Szeintometrie? (1999)
0.01
0.008324681 = product of:
0.016649362 = sum of:
0.016649362 = product of:
0.049948085 = sum of:
0.049948085 = weight(_text_:j in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049948085 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Zuerst publiziert in: Kommunikation statt Markt: Zu einer alternativen Theorie der Informationsgesellschaft. Hrsg.: J. Becker u. W. Göhring. Sankt Augustin: GMD. (GMD Report; 61) S.27-38.
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.008088676 = product of:
0.016177353 = sum of:
0.016177353 = product of:
0.048532058 = sum of:
0.048532058 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048532058 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
