Search (310 results, page 16 of 16)

0.004044338 = product of:
  0.008088676 = sum of:
    0.008088676 = product of:
      0.024266029 = sum of:
        0.024266029 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024266029 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

9. 7.2006 10:22:35

0.004044338 = product of:
  0.008088676 = sum of:
    0.008088676 = product of:
      0.024266029 = sum of:
        0.024266029 = weight(_text_:22 in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024266029 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Beitrag einer Section "Selected Papers from the 1ST Brazilian Conference on Knowledge Organization And Representation, Faculdade de Ciência da Informação, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro Brasília, DF Brasil, October 20-22, 2011" Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_3_g.pdf.

0.0035387957 = product of:
  0.0070775915 = sum of:
    0.0070775915 = product of:
      0.021232774 = sum of:
        0.021232774 = weight(_text_:22 in 2597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021232774 = score(doc=2597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2597)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.0033298726 = product of:
  0.0066597452 = sum of:
    0.0066597452 = product of:
      0.019979235 = sum of:
        0.019979235 = weight(_text_:j in 6026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019979235 = score(doc=6026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 6026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6026)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The British controversy over the validity of Urquhart's and Garfield's Laws during the 1970s constitutes an important episode in the formulation of the probability structure of human knowledge. This controversy took place within the historical context of the convergence of two scientific revolutions-the bibliometric and the biometric-that had been launched in Britain. The preceding decades had witnessed major breakthroughs in understanding the probability distributions underlying the use of human knowledge. Two of the most important of these breakthroughs were the laws posited by Donald J. Urquhart and Eugene Garfield, who played major roles in establishing the institutional bases of the bibliometric revolution. For his part, Urquhart began his realization of S. C. Bradford's concept of a national science library by analyzing the borrowing of journals on interlibrary loan from the Science Museum Library in 1956. He found that 10% of the journals accounted for 80% of the loans and formulated Urquhart's Law, by which the interlibrary use of a journal is a measure of its total use. This law underlay the operations of the National Lending Library for Science and Technology (NLLST), which Urquhart founded. The NLLST became the British Library Lending Division (BLLD) and ultimately the British Library Document Supply Centre (BLDSC). In contrast, Garfield did a study of 1969 journal citations as part of the process of creating the Science Citation Index (SCI), formulating his Law of Concentration, by which the bulk of the information needs in science can be satisfied by a relatively small, multidisciplinary core of journals. This law became the operational principle of the Institute for Scientif ic Information created by Garfield. A study at the BLLD under Urquhart's successor, Maurice B. Line, found low correlations of NLLST use with SCI citations, and publication of this study started a major controversy, during which both laws were called into question. The study was based on the faulty use of the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, and the controversy over it was instrumental in causing B. C. Brookes to investigate bibliometric laws as probabilistic phenomena and begin to link the bibliometric with the biometric revolution. This paper concludes with a resolution of the controversy by means of a statistical technique that incorporates Brookes' criticism of the Spearman rank-correlation method and demonstrates the mutual supportiveness of the two laws

0.0033298726 = product of:
  0.0066597452 = sum of:
    0.0066597452 = product of:
      0.019979235 = sum of:
        0.019979235 = weight(_text_:j in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019979235 = score(doc=4719,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0033298726 = product of:
  0.0066597452 = sum of:
    0.0066597452 = product of:
      0.019979235 = sum of:
        0.019979235 = weight(_text_:j in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019979235 = score(doc=1734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0033298726 = product of:
  0.0066597452 = sum of:
    0.0066597452 = product of:
      0.019979235 = sum of:
        0.019979235 = weight(_text_:j in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019979235 = score(doc=4141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0033298726 = product of:
  0.0066597452 = sum of:
    0.0066597452 = product of:
      0.019979235 = sum of:
        0.019979235 = weight(_text_:j in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019979235 = score(doc=3312,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Inhalt: Metrics in Research - For better or worse? / Jozica Dolenc, Philippe Hünenberger Oliver Renn - A brief visual history of research metrics / Oliver Renn, Jozica Dolenc, Joachim Schnabl - Bibliometry: The wizard of O's / Philippe Hünenberger - The grip of bibliometrics - A student perspective / Matthias Tinzl - Honesty and transparency to taxpayers is the long-term fundament for stable university funding / Wendelin J. Stark - Beyond metrics: Managing the performance of your work / Charlie Rapple - Scientific profiling instead of bibliometrics: Key performance indicators of the future / Rafael Ball - More knowledge, less numbers / Carl Philipp Rosenau - Do we really need BIBLIO-metrics to evaluate individual researchers? / Rüdiger Mutz - Using research metrics responsibly and effectively as a researcher / Peter I. Darroch, Lisa H. Colledge - Metrics in research: More (valuable) questions than answers / Urs Hugentobler - Publication of research results: Use and abuse / Wilfred F. van Gunsteren - Wanted: Transparent algorithms, interpretation skills, common sense / Eva E. Wille - Impact factors, the h-index, and citation hype - Metrics in research from the point of view of a journal editor / Renato Zenobi - Rashomon or metrics in a publisher's world / Gabriella Karger - The impact factor and I: A love-hate relationship / Jean-Christophe Leroux - Personal experiences bringing altmetrics to the academic market / Ben McLeish - Fatally attracted by numbers? / Oliver Renn - On computable numbers / Gerd Folkers, Laura Folkers - ScienceMatters - Single observation science publishing and linking observations to create an internet of science / Lawrence Rajendran.

0.0030332534 = product of:
  0.0060665067 = sum of:
    0.0060665067 = product of:
      0.01819952 = sum of:
        0.01819952 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01819952 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.0024974043 = product of:
  0.0049948087 = sum of:
    0.0049948087 = product of:
      0.014984426 = sum of:
        0.014984426 = weight(_text_:j in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014984426 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044775832 = queryNorm
            0.105320126 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)