-
Foster, A.; Ford, N.: Serendipity and information seeking : an empirical study (2003)
0.02
0.021459213 = product of:
0.042918425 = sum of:
0.042918425 = product of:
0.12875527 = sum of:
0.12875527 = weight(_text_:n in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12875527 = score(doc=1083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.6669253 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kuriyama, K.; Kando, N.; Nozue, T.; Eguchi, K.: Pooling for a large-scale test collection : an analysis of the search results from the First NTCIR Workshop (2002)
0.02
0.018393612 = product of:
0.036787223 = sum of:
0.036787223 = product of:
0.110361665 = sum of:
0.110361665 = weight(_text_:n in 3830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110361665 = score(doc=3830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.57165027 = fieldWeight in 3830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3830)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hawking, D.; Craswell, N.: ¬The very large collection and Web tracks (2005)
0.02
0.018393612 = product of:
0.036787223 = sum of:
0.036787223 = product of:
0.110361665 = sum of:
0.110361665 = weight(_text_:n in 5085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110361665 = score(doc=5085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.57165027 = fieldWeight in 5085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5085)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000)
0.01
0.014155183 = product of:
0.028310366 = sum of:
0.028310366 = product of:
0.0849311 = sum of:
0.0849311 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0849311 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 8.2001 16:22:19
-
Allan, J.; Croft, W.B.; Callan, J.: ¬The University of Massachusetts and a dozen TRECs (2005)
0.01
0.014127454 = product of:
0.028254908 = sum of:
0.028254908 = product of:
0.08476472 = sum of:
0.08476472 = weight(_text_:j in 5086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08476472 = score(doc=5086,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.5957806 = fieldWeight in 5086, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5086)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Oberhauser, O.; Labner, J.: Einführung der automatischen Indexierung im Österreichischen Verbundkatalog? : Bericht über eine empirische Studie (2003)
0.01
0.011654554 = product of:
0.023309108 = sum of:
0.023309108 = product of:
0.06992732 = sum of:
0.06992732 = weight(_text_:j in 1878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06992732 = score(doc=1878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 1878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1878)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Robertson, S.; Callan, J.: Routing and filtering (2005)
0.01
0.011654554 = product of:
0.023309108 = sum of:
0.023309108 = product of:
0.06992732 = sum of:
0.06992732 = weight(_text_:j in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06992732 = score(doc=4688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Schoger, A.; Frommer, J.: Heterogen - was nun? : Evaluierung heterogener bibliographischer Metadaten (2000)
0.01
0.009989617 = product of:
0.019979235 = sum of:
0.019979235 = product of:
0.059937704 = sum of:
0.059937704 = weight(_text_:j in 4465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059937704 = score(doc=4465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 4465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4465)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001)
0.01
0.009989617 = product of:
0.019979235 = sum of:
0.019979235 = product of:
0.059937704 = sum of:
0.059937704 = weight(_text_:j in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059937704 = score(doc=6386,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
-
Palmquist, R.A.; Kim, K.-S.: Cognitive style and on-line database search experience as predictors of Web search performance (2000)
0.01
0.009196806 = product of:
0.018393612 = sum of:
0.018393612 = product of:
0.055180833 = sum of:
0.055180833 = weight(_text_:n in 4605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055180833 = score(doc=4605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 4605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4605)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study sought to investigate the effects of cognitive style (field dependent and field independent) and on-line database search experience (novice and experienced) on the WWW search performance of undergraduate college students (n=48). It also attempted to find user factors that could be used to predict search efficiency. search performance, the dependent variable was defined in 2 ways: (1) time required for retrieving a relevant information item, and (2) the number of nodes traversed for retrieving a relevant information item. the search tasks required were carried out on a University Web site, and included a factual task and a topical search task of interest to the participant. Results indicated that while cognitive style (FD/FI) significantly influenced the search performance of novice searchers, the influence was greatly reduced in those searchers who had on-line database search experience. Based on the findings, suggestions for possible changes to the design of the current Web interface and to user training programs are provided
-
Alemayehu, N.: Analysis of performance variation using quey expansion (2003)
0.01
0.009196806 = product of:
0.018393612 = sum of:
0.018393612 = product of:
0.055180833 = sum of:
0.055180833 = weight(_text_:n in 1454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055180833 = score(doc=1454,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 1454, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1454)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
MacFarlane, A.: Evaluation of web search for the information practitioner (2007)
0.01
0.009196806 = product of:
0.018393612 = sum of:
0.018393612 = product of:
0.055180833 = sum of:
0.055180833 = weight(_text_:n in 817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055180833 = score(doc=817,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 817, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=817)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The aim of the paper is to put forward a structured mechanism for web search evaluation. The paper seeks to point to useful scientific research and show how information practitioners can use these methods in evaluation of search on the web for their users. Design/methodology/approach - The paper puts forward an approach which utilizes traditional laboratory-based evaluation measures such as average precision/precision at N documents, augmented with diagnostic measures such as link broken, etc., which are used to show why precision measures are depressed as well as the quality of the search engines crawling mechanism. Findings - The paper shows how to use diagnostic measures in conjunction with precision in order to evaluate web search. Practical implications - The methodology presented in this paper will be useful to any information professional who regularly uses web search as part of their information seeking and needs to evaluate web search services. Originality/value - The paper argues that the use of diagnostic measures is essential in web search, as precision measures on their own do not allow a searcher to understand why search results differ between search engines.
-
Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001)
0.01
0.008324681 = product of:
0.016649362 = sum of:
0.016649362 = product of:
0.049948085 = sum of:
0.049948085 = weight(_text_:j in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049948085 = score(doc=5863,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Retrievaltests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das aufgrund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
-
Griesbaum, J.; Rittberger, M.; Bekavac, B.: Deutsche Suchmaschinen im Vergleich : AltaVista.de, Fireball.de, Google.de und Lycos.de (2002)
0.01
0.008324681 = product of:
0.016649362 = sum of:
0.016649362 = product of:
0.049948085 = sum of:
0.049948085 = weight(_text_:j in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049948085 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001)
0.01
0.008088676 = product of:
0.016177353 = sum of:
0.016177353 = product of:
0.048532058 = sum of:
0.048532058 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048532058 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
-
¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003)
0.01
0.008088676 = product of:
0.016177353 = sum of:
0.016177353 = product of:
0.048532058 = sum of:
0.048532058 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048532058 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.
-
Blandford, A.; Adams, A.; Attfield, S.; Buchanan, G.; Gow, J.; Makri, S.; Rimmer, J.; Warwick, C.: ¬The PRET A Rapporter framework : evaluating digital libraries from the perspective of information work (2008)
0.01
0.007063727 = product of:
0.014127454 = sum of:
0.014127454 = product of:
0.04238236 = sum of:
0.04238236 = weight(_text_:j in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238236 = score(doc=2021,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bar-Ilan, J.: Methods for measuring search engine performance over time (2002)
0.01
0.0066597452 = product of:
0.0133194905 = sum of:
0.0133194905 = product of:
0.03995847 = sum of:
0.03995847 = weight(_text_:j in 305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03995847 = score(doc=305,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 305, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=305)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Tague-Sutcliffe, J.: Information retrieval experimentation (2009)
0.01
0.0066597452 = product of:
0.0133194905 = sum of:
0.0133194905 = product of:
0.03995847 = sum of:
0.03995847 = weight(_text_:j in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03995847 = score(doc=3801,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Mansourian, Y.; Ford, N.: Web searchers' attributions of success and failure: an empirical study (2007)
0.01
0.006131204 = product of:
0.012262408 = sum of:
0.012262408 = product of:
0.036787223 = sum of:
0.036787223 = weight(_text_:n in 840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036787223 = score(doc=840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.19055009 = fieldWeight in 840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=840)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
