Search (1741 results, page 1 of 88)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.11
    0.105544224 = sum of:
      0.08889487 = product of:
        0.35557947 = sum of:
          0.35557947 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.35557947 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.37961 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.016649362 = product of:
        0.049948085 = sum of:
          0.049948085 = weight(_text_:j in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049948085 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Rekabsaz, N. et al.: Toward optimized multimodal concept indexing (2016) 0.10
    0.101290606 = product of:
      0.20258121 = sum of:
        0.20258121 = sum of:
          0.049948085 = weight(_text_:j in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049948085 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
          0.09196805 = weight(_text_:n in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09196805 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
          0.06066507 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06066507 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Source
    Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: J. Cardoso et al
  3. Platis, N. et al.: Visualization of uncertainty in tag clouds (2016) 0.10
    0.101290606 = product of:
      0.20258121 = sum of:
        0.20258121 = sum of:
          0.049948085 = weight(_text_:j in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049948085 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
          0.09196805 = weight(_text_:n in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09196805 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
          0.06066507 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06066507 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Source
    Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: J. Cardoso et al
  4. Huang, M.; Barbour, J.; Su, C.; Contractor, N.: Why do group members provide information to digital knowledge repositories? : a multilevel application of transactive memory theory (2013) 0.08
    0.07840944 = product of:
      0.15681888 = sum of:
        0.15681888 = sum of:
          0.04238236 = weight(_text_:j in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238236 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
          0.07803748 = weight(_text_:n in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07803748 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.40421778 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
          0.03639904 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03639904 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of digital knowledge repositories (DKRs) used for distributed and collocated work raises important questions about how to manage these technologies. This study investigates why individuals contribute information to DKRs by applying and extending transactive memory theory. Data from knowledge workers (N = 208) nested in work groups (J = 17) located in Europe and the United States revealed, consistent with transactive memory theory, that perceptions of experts' retrieval of information were positively related to the likelihood of information provision to DKRs. The relationship between experts' perceptions of retrieval and information provision varied from group to group, and cross-level interactions indicated that trust in how the information would be used and the interdependence of tasks within groups could explain that variation. Furthermore, information provision to DKRs was related to communication networks in ways consistent with theorizing regarding the formation of transactive memory systems. Implications for theory and practice are discussed, emphasizing the utility of multilevel approaches for conceptualizing and modeling why individuals provide information to DKRs.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:39:00
  5. Jordan, J.: Nicolas Bourbaki (2014) 0.08
    0.075688615 = product of:
      0.15137723 = sum of:
        0.15137723 = product of:
          0.22706583 = sum of:
            0.07991694 = weight(_text_:j in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07991694 = score(doc=6031,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
            0.14714889 = weight(_text_:n in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14714889 = score(doc=6031,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.76220036 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Biographed
    Bourbaki, N.
  6. Hierl, S.; Bauer, L.; Böllers, N.; Herget, J.: Kollaborative Konzeption von Ontologien in der Hochschullehre : Theorie, Chancen und mögliche Umsetzung (2010) 0.07
    0.066981114 = product of:
      0.13396223 = sum of:
        0.13396223 = sum of:
          0.04238236 = weight(_text_:j in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238236 = score(doc=3732,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
          0.055180833 = weight(_text_:n in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055180833 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
          0.03639904 = weight(_text_:22 in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03639904 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  7. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.06
    0.06332654 = sum of:
      0.05333692 = product of:
        0.21334767 = sum of:
          0.21334767 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21334767 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.37961 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.009989617 = product of:
        0.029968852 = sum of:
          0.029968852 = weight(_text_:j in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029968852 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  8. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.06
    0.059253808 = product of:
      0.118507616 = sum of:
        0.118507616 = product of:
          0.17776142 = sum of:
            0.09196805 = weight(_text_:n in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09196805 = score(doc=3582,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
            0.08579337 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08579337 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  9. Crespo, J.A.; Herranz, N.; Li, Y.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: ¬The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014) 0.06
    0.056927375 = product of:
      0.11385475 = sum of:
        0.11385475 = sum of:
          0.024974043 = weight(_text_:j in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024974043 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.045984026 = weight(_text_:n in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045984026 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.042896684 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042896684 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article studies the impact of differences in citation practices at the subfield, or Web of Science subject category level, using the model introduced in Crespo, Li, and Ruiz-Castillo (2013a), according to which the number of citations received by an article depends on its underlying scientific influence and the field to which it belongs. We use the same Thomson Reuters data set of about 4.4 million articles used in Crespo et al. (2013a) to analyze 22 broad fields. The main results are the following: First, when the classification system goes from 22 fields to 219 subfields the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices increases from ?14% at the field level to 18% at the subfield level. Second, we estimate a set of exchange rates (ERs) over a wide [660, 978] citation quantile interval to express the citation counts of articles into the equivalent counts in the all-sciences case. In the fractional case, for example, we find that in 187 of 219 subfields the ERs are reliable in the sense that the coefficient of variation is smaller than or equal to 0.10. Third, in the fractional case the normalization of the raw data using the ERs (or subfield mean citations) as normalization factors reduces the importance of the differences in citation practices from 18% to 3.8% (3.4%) of overall citation inequality. Fourth, the results in the fractional case are essentially replicated when we adopt a multiplicative approach.
  10. Simons, N.; Solland, A.; Hettenhausen, J.: Griffith Research Hub (2015) 0.06
    0.056766458 = product of:
      0.113532916 = sum of:
        0.113532916 = product of:
          0.17029937 = sum of:
            0.059937704 = weight(_text_:j in 2549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059937704 = score(doc=2549,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 2549, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2549)
            0.110361665 = weight(_text_:n in 2549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.110361665 = score(doc=2549,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.57165027 = fieldWeight in 2549, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2549)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Bronstein, J.; Gazit, T.; Perez, O.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Aharony, N.; Amichai-Hamburger, Y.: ¬An examination of the factors contributing to participation in online social platforms (2016) 0.06
    0.055817597 = product of:
      0.11163519 = sum of:
        0.11163519 = sum of:
          0.035318628 = weight(_text_:j in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035318628 = score(doc=3364,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
          0.045984026 = weight(_text_:n in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045984026 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
          0.030332536 = weight(_text_:22 in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030332536 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  12. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.05
    0.05333692 = product of:
      0.10667384 = sum of:
        0.10667384 = product of:
          0.42669535 = sum of:
            0.42669535 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.42669535 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37961 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  13. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.05
    0.052772112 = sum of:
      0.044447433 = product of:
        0.17778973 = sum of:
          0.17778973 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17778973 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.37961 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.008324681 = product of:
        0.024974043 = sum of:
          0.024974043 = weight(_text_:j in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024974043 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  14. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.05
    0.05161947 = product of:
      0.10323894 = sum of:
        0.10323894 = product of:
          0.15485841 = sum of:
            0.06992732 = weight(_text_:j in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06992732 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.4914939 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
            0.0849311 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0849311 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
  15. Westerman, S.J.; Cribbin, T.; Collins, J.: Human assessments of document similarity (2010) 0.05
    0.051118985 = product of:
      0.10223797 = sum of:
        0.10223797 = product of:
          0.15335695 = sum of:
            0.029968852 = weight(_text_:j in 3915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029968852 = score(doc=3915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3915)
            0.1233881 = weight(_text_:n in 3915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1233881 = score(doc=3915,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.63912445 = fieldWeight in 3915, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3915)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Two studies are reported that examined the reliability of human assessments of document similarity and the association between human ratings and the results of n-gram automatic text analysis (ATA). Human interassessor reliability (IAR) was moderate to poor. However, correlations between average human ratings and n-gram solutions were strong. The average correlation between ATA and individual human solutions was greater than IAR. N-gram length influenced the strength of association, but optimum string length depended on the nature of the text (technical vs. nontechnical). We conclude that the methodology applied in previous studies may have led to overoptimistic views on human reliability, but that an optimal n-gram solution can provide a good approximation of the average human assessment of document similarity, a result that has important implications for future development of document visualization systems.
    Object
    n-grams
  16. Paul-Hus, A.; Desrochers, N.; Rijcke, S.de; Rushforth, A.D.: ¬The reward system of science (2017) 0.05
    0.050877713 = product of:
      0.101755425 = sum of:
        0.101755425 = product of:
          0.15263313 = sum of:
            0.09196805 = weight(_text_:n in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09196805 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
            0.06066507 = weight(_text_:22 in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06066507 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  17. Ford, N.: Introduction to information behaviour (2015) 0.05
    0.050877713 = product of:
      0.101755425 = sum of:
        0.101755425 = product of:
          0.15263313 = sum of:
            0.09196805 = weight(_text_:n in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09196805 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
            0.06066507 = weight(_text_:22 in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06066507 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:45:48
  18. Häring, N.; Hensinger, P.: "Digitale Bildung" : Der abschüssige Weg zur Konditionierungsanstalt (2019) 0.05
    0.050877713 = product of:
      0.101755425 = sum of:
        0.101755425 = product of:
          0.15263313 = sum of:
            0.09196805 = weight(_text_:n in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09196805 = score(doc=4999,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.47637522 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
            0.06066507 = weight(_text_:22 in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06066507 = score(doc=4999,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044775832 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2019 11:45:19
  19. Hauser, S.: Terminologiearbeit im Bereich Wissensorganisation : Vergleich dreier Publikationen anhand der Darstellung des Themenkomplexes Thesaurus (2010) 0.05
    0.050645303 = product of:
      0.101290606 = sum of:
        0.101290606 = sum of:
          0.024974043 = weight(_text_:j in 3735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024974043 = score(doc=3735,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 3735, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3735)
          0.045984026 = weight(_text_:n in 3735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045984026 = score(doc=3735,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 3735, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3735)
          0.030332536 = weight(_text_:22 in 3735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030332536 = score(doc=3735,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3735, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3735)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In den letzten Jahren hat Terminologiearbeit in den Bereichen Wissensorganisation bzw. Bibliothek Information Dokumentation (BID)eine gewisse Renaissance erfahren, was sich auch in der Neuauflage einschlägiger Werke äußert. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird hier ein Vergleich solcher aktueller Ansätze von deutschsprachiger Terminologiearbeit geleistet und zu diesem Zweck ein abgrenzbarer Themenkomplex aus drei Publikationen herausgelöst. Genauer gefasst lauten die Fragenstellungen dabei folgendermaßen: - Zu welchen Ergebnissen bzw. Produkten führt Terminologiearbeit? - Welche Unterschiede sind dabei feststellbar? - Auf welche Faktoren können diese Unterschiede zurückgeführt werden? Der Bereich Wissensorganisation - ob im weiteren Sinne verstanden als "Methoden und Systeme zur Organisation von Informationen", als "Objekte und Tätigkeiten der Begriffstheorie, der Klassifikation und Indexierung und der Wissensrepräsentation" (Dahlberg 1994, S.226), ob im engeren Sinn als "descriptions of documents, their contents, features and purposes, and the organization of these descriptions so as to make these documents [...] accessible [...]"2 - Wissensorganisation mit den darin eingesetzten Hilfsmitteln und Instrumenten bedarf als Fachgebiet selbst einer Terminologie, einer "strukturierte[n] Gesamtheit der Begriffe und der diesen zugeordneten Repräsentationen" (Budin 1996, S.16). Diese Fachterminologie ist Gegenstand wie Ergebnis von Terminologiearbeit, indem etwa Termini gesammelt und terminologische Festlegungen getroffen und diese mittels Glossaren oder Fachwörterbüchern zugänglich gemacht werden. Die Betrachtungsweise ist dabei synchron, der Bereich der reinen Deskription wird oft verlassen, es werden präskriptiv Setzungen vorgenommen.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  20. Ménard, E.; Khashman, N.; Kochkina, S.; Torres-Moreno, J.-M.; Velazquez-Morales, P.; Zhou, F.; Jourlin, P.; Rawat, P.; Peinl, P.; Linhares Pontes, E.; Brunetti., I.: ¬A second life for TIIARA : from bilingual to multilingual! (2016) 0.05
    0.050645303 = product of:
      0.101290606 = sum of:
        0.101290606 = sum of:
          0.024974043 = weight(_text_:j in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024974043 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14227505 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
          0.045984026 = weight(_text_:n in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045984026 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
          0.030332536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030332536 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15679733 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044775832 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.1, S.22-34

Languages

  • e 1272
  • d 454
  • a 2
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1528
  • el 175
  • m 123
  • s 38
  • x 20
  • n 14
  • r 8
  • b 5
  • i 2
  • p 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications