Search (132 results, page 7 of 7)

0.0067530405 = product of:
  0.013506081 = sum of:
    0.013506081 = product of:
      0.027012162 = sum of:
        0.027012162 = weight(_text_:u in 2396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027012162 = score(doc=2396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2396)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Vgl. auch die anderen Ausgabe in dt. u. engl. Sprache

0.0067530405 = product of:
  0.013506081 = sum of:
    0.013506081 = product of:
      0.027012162 = sum of:
        0.027012162 = weight(_text_:u in 3223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027012162 = score(doc=3223,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 3223, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3223)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.0067530405 = product of:
  0.013506081 = sum of:
    0.013506081 = product of:
      0.027012162 = sum of:
        0.027012162 = weight(_text_:u in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027012162 = score(doc=5602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Editor

Drewer, P. u. D. Pulitano

0.0061787996 = product of:
  0.012357599 = sum of:
    0.012357599 = product of:
      0.024715198 = sum of:
        0.024715198 = weight(_text_:22 in 4217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024715198 = score(doc=4217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1596997 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2018 11:32:44

0.0054064495 = product of:
  0.010812899 = sum of:
    0.010812899 = product of:
      0.021625798 = sum of:
        0.021625798 = weight(_text_:22 in 5759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021625798 = score(doc=5759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1596997 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 5759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Handelsblatt. Nr.79 vom 24.4.2001, S.22

0.0054064495 = product of:
  0.010812899 = sum of:
    0.010812899 = product of:
      0.021625798 = sum of:
        0.021625798 = weight(_text_:22 in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021625798 = score(doc=1616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1596997 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The information available in languages other than English in the World Wide Web is increasing significantly. According to a report from Computer Economics in 1999, 54% of Internet users are English speakers ("English Will Dominate Web for Only Three More Years," Computer Economics, July 9, 1999, http://www.computereconomics. com/new4/pr/pr990610.html). However, it is predicted that there will be only 60% increase in Internet users among English speakers verses a 150% growth among nonEnglish speakers for the next five years. By 2005, 57% of Internet users will be non-English speakers. A report by CNN.com in 2000 showed that the number of Internet users in China had been increased from 8.9 million to 16.9 million from January to June in 2000 ("Report: China Internet users double to 17 million," CNN.com, July, 2000, http://cnn.org/2000/TECH/computing/07/27/ china.internet.reut/index.html). According to Nielsen/ NetRatings, there was a dramatic leap from 22.5 millions to 56.6 millions Internet users from 2001 to 2002. China had become the second largest global at-home Internet population in 2002 (US's Internet population was 166 millions) (Robyn Greenspan, "China Pulls Ahead of Japan," Internet.com, April 22, 2002, http://cyberatias.internet.com/big-picture/geographics/article/0,,5911_1013841,00. html). All of the evidences reveal the importance of crosslingual research to satisfy the needs in the near future. Digital library research has been focusing in structural and semantic interoperability in the past. Searching and retrieving objects across variations in protocols, formats and disciplines are widely explored (Schatz, B., & Chen, H. (1999). Digital libraries: technological advances and social impacts. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, February, 32(2), 45-50.; Chen, H., Yen, J., & Yang, C.C. (1999). International activities: development of Asian digital libraries. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, 32(2), 48-49.). However, research in crossing language boundaries, especially across European languages and Oriental languages, is still in the initial stage. In this proposal, we put our focus an cross-lingual semantic interoperability by developing automatic generation of a cross-lingual thesaurus based an English/Chinese parallel corpus. When the searchers encounter retrieval problems, Professional librarians usually consult the thesaurus to identify other relevant vocabularies. In the problem of searching across language boundaries, a cross-lingual thesaurus, which is generated by co-occurrence analysis and Hopfield network, can be used to generate additional semantically relevant terms that cannot be obtained from dictionary. In particular, the automatically generated cross-lingual thesaurus is able to capture the unknown words that do not exist in a dictionary, such as names of persons, organizations, and events. Due to Hong Kong's unique history background, both English and Chinese are used as official languages in all legal documents. Therefore, English/Chinese cross-lingual information retrieval is critical for applications in courts and the government. In this paper, we develop an automatic thesaurus by the Hopfield network based an a parallel corpus collected from the Web site of the Department of Justice of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government. Experiments are conducted to measure the precision and recall of the automatic generated English/Chinese thesaurus. The result Shows that such thesaurus is a promising tool to retrieve relevant terms, especially in the language that is not the same as the input term. The direct translation of the input term can also be retrieved in most of the cases.

0.0054064495 = product of:
  0.010812899 = sum of:
    0.010812899 = product of:
      0.021625798 = sum of:
        0.021625798 = weight(_text_:22 in 4044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021625798 = score(doc=4044,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1596997 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 4044, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4044)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

3. 5.1997 8:44:22

0.0054064495 = product of:
  0.010812899 = sum of:
    0.010812899 = product of:
      0.021625798 = sum of:
        0.021625798 = weight(_text_:22 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021625798 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1596997 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.0054024323 = product of:
  0.010804865 = sum of:
    0.010804865 = product of:
      0.02160973 = sum of:
        0.02160973 = weight(_text_:u in 3115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02160973 = score(doc=3115,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 3115, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3115)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.0054024323 = product of:
  0.010804865 = sum of:
    0.010804865 = product of:
      0.02160973 = sum of:
        0.02160973 = weight(_text_:u in 5218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02160973 = score(doc=5218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 5218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5218)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.004727128 = product of:
  0.009454256 = sum of:
    0.009454256 = product of:
      0.018908512 = sum of:
        0.018908512 = weight(_text_:u in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018908512 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.12662244 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)

0.004727128 = product of:
  0.009454256 = sum of:
    0.009454256 = product of:
      0.018908512 = sum of:
        0.018908512 = weight(_text_:u in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018908512 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932987 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045604642 = queryNorm
            0.12662244 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)