-
Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998)
0.08
0.083267935 = product of:
0.16653587 = sum of:
0.16653587 = sum of:
0.07961999 = weight(_text_:f in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07961999 = score(doc=3690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.08691588 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691588 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:22:35
-
Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008)
0.04
0.043514617 = product of:
0.08702923 = sum of:
0.08702923 = sum of:
0.05629983 = weight(_text_:f in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05629983 = score(doc=1934,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.030729406 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030729406 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Um sich einer Antwort auf die Frage anzunähern, welche Bedeutung der Nachlass eines Wissenschaftlers wie jener Paul F. Lazarsfelds (mit zahlreichen noch unveröffentlichten Schriften) für die aktuelle Forschung haben könne, kann untersucht werden, wie häufig dieser Wissenschaftler zitiert wird. Wenn ein Autor zitiert wird, wird er auch genutzt. Wird er über einen langen Zeitraum oft genutzt, ist vermutlich auch die Auseinandersetzung mit seinem Nachlass von Nutzen. Außerdem kann aufgrund der Zitierungen festgestellt werden, was aus dem Lebenswerk eines Wissenschaftlers für die aktuelle Forschung relevant erscheint. Daraus können die vordringlichen Fragestellungen in der Bearbeitung des Nachlasses abgeleitet werden. Die Aufgabe für die folgende Untersuchung lautete daher: Wie oft wird Paul F. Lazarsfeld zitiert? Dabei interessierte auch: Wer zitiert wo? Die Untersuchung wurde mit Hilfe der Meta-Datenbank "ISI Web of Knowledge" durchgeführt. In dieser wurde im "Web of Science" mit dem Werkzeug "Cited Reference Search" nach dem zitierten Autor (Cited Author) "Lazarsfeld P*" gesucht. Diese Suche ergab 1535 Referenzen (References). Werden alle Referenzen gewählt, führt dies zu 4839 Ergebnissen (Results). Dabei wurden die Datenbanken SCI-Expanded, SSCI und A&HCI verwendet. Bei dieser Suche wurden die Publikationsjahre 1941-2008 analysiert. Vor 1956 wurden allerdings nur sehr wenige Zitate gefunden: 1946 fünf, ansonsten maximal drei, 1942-1944 und 1949 überhaupt keines. Zudem ist das Jahr 2008 noch lange nicht zu Ende. (Es gab jedoch schon vor Ende März 24 Zitate!)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 12:54:12
-
Wan, X.; Liu, F.: Are all literature citations equally important? : automatic citation strength estimation and its applications (2014)
0.04
0.042323638 = product of:
0.084647276 = sum of:
0.084647276 = sum of:
0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 1350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04777199 = score(doc=1350,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 1350, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1350)
0.036875285 = weight(_text_:22 in 1350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036875285 = score(doc=1350,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1350, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1350)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:12:35
-
Kronegger, L.; Mali, F.; Ferligoj, A.; Doreian, P.: Classifying scientific disciplines in Slovenia : a study of the evolution of collaboration structures (2015)
0.04
0.042323638 = product of:
0.084647276 = sum of:
0.084647276 = sum of:
0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04777199 = score(doc=1639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
0.036875285 = weight(_text_:22 in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036875285 = score(doc=1639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 1.2015 14:55:22
-
Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018)
0.04
0.042323638 = product of:
0.084647276 = sum of:
0.084647276 = sum of:
0.04777199 = weight(_text_:f in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04777199 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.036875285 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036875285 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 7.2018 10:00:22
-
Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023)
0.04
0.0352697 = product of:
0.0705394 = sum of:
0.0705394 = sum of:
0.039809994 = weight(_text_:f in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039809994 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.030729406 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030729406 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:02
-
Narin, F.; Moll, J.K.: Bibliometrics (1977)
0.03
0.031847995 = product of:
0.06369599 = sum of:
0.06369599 = product of:
0.12739198 = sum of:
0.12739198 = weight(_text_:f in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12739198 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.7045941 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Tonta, Y.; Ünal, Y.: Scatter of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in document delivery requests (2005)
0.03
0.028215759 = product of:
0.056431517 = sum of:
0.056431517 = sum of:
0.031847995 = weight(_text_:f in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031847995 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.17614852 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
0.024583524 = weight(_text_:22 in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024583524 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this paper we investigate the scattering of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in more than 137,000 document delivery requests submitted to a national document delivery service. We first summarize the major findings of the study with regards to the performance of the service. We then identify the "core" journals from which article requests were satisfied and address the following research questions: (a) Does the distribution of (core) journals conform to the Bradford's Law of Scattering? (b) Is there a relationship between usage of journals and impact factors, journals with high impact factors being used more often than the rest? (c) Is there a relationship between usage of journals and total citation counts, journals with high total citation counts being used more often than the rest? (d) What is the median age of use (half-life) of requested articles in general? (e) Do requested articles that appear in core journals get obsolete more slowly? (f) Is there a relationship between obsolescence and journal impact factors, journals with high impact factors being obsolete more slowly? (g) Is there a relationship between obsolescence and total citation counts, journals with high total citation counts being obsolete more slowly? Based an the analysis of findings, we found that the distribution of highly and moderately used journal titles conform to Bradford's Law. The median age of use was 8 years for all requested articles. Ninety percent of the articles requested were 21 years of age or younger. Articles that appeared in 168 core journal titles seem to get obsolete slightly more slowly than those of all titles. We observed no statistically significant correlations between the frequency of journal use and ISI journal impact factors, and between the frequency of journal use and ISI- (Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, PA) cited half-lives for the most heavily used 168 core journal titles. There was a weak correlation between usage of journals and ISI-reported total citation counts. No statistically significant relationship was found between median age of use and journal impact factors and between median age of use and total citation counts. There was a weak negative correlation between ISI journal impact factors and cited half-lives of 168 core journals, and a weak correlation between ISI citation halflives and use half-lives of core journals. No correlation was found between cited half-lives of 168 core journals and their corresponding total citation counts as reported by ISI. Findings of the current study are discussed along with those of other studies.
- Date
- 20. 3.2005 10:54:22
-
Carpenter, M.P.; Narin, F.: ¬The adequacy of Science Citation Index (SCI) as an indicator of international scientific activity (1981)
0.03
0.027866995 = product of:
0.05573399 = sum of:
0.05573399 = product of:
0.11146798 = sum of:
0.11146798 = weight(_text_:f in 6680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11146798 = score(doc=6680,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.6165198 = fieldWeight in 6680, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6680)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.02
0.024583524 = product of:
0.04916705 = sum of:
0.04916705 = product of:
0.0983341 = sum of:
0.0983341 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0983341 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.024583524 = product of:
0.04916705 = sum of:
0.04916705 = product of:
0.0983341 = sum of:
0.0983341 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0983341 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.02
0.024583524 = product of:
0.04916705 = sum of:
0.04916705 = product of:
0.0983341 = sum of:
0.0983341 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0983341 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Bartolucci, F.: On a possible decomposition of the h-index. (2012)
0.02
0.023885995 = product of:
0.04777199 = sum of:
0.04777199 = product of:
0.09554398 = sum of:
0.09554398 = weight(_text_:f in 454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09554398 = score(doc=454,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 454, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=454)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Freistetter, F.: Warum jeder (fast) jeden kennt (2017)
0.02
0.023885995 = product of:
0.04777199 = sum of:
0.04777199 = product of:
0.09554398 = sum of:
0.09554398 = weight(_text_:f in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09554398 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Jacso, P.: Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster (2008)
0.02
0.022254463 = product of:
0.044508927 = sum of:
0.044508927 = product of:
0.08901785 = sum of:
0.08901785 = weight(_text_:f in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08901785 = score(doc=5586,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.4923501 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper focuses on the practical limitations in the content and software of the databases that are used to calculate the h-index for assessing the publishing productivity and impact of researchers. To celebrate F. W. Lancaster's biological age of seventy-five, and "scientific age" of forty-five, this paper discusses the related features of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS), and demonstrates in the latter how a much more realistic and fair h-index can be computed for F. W. Lancaster than the one produced automatically. Browsing and searching the cited reference index of the 1945-2007 edition of WoS, which in my estimate has over a hundred million "orphan references" that have no counterpart master records to be attached to, and "stray references" that cite papers which do have master records but cannot be identified by the matching algorithm because of errors of omission and commission in the references of the citing works, can bring up hundreds of additional cited references given to works of an accomplished author but are ignored in the automatic process of calculating the h-index. The partially manual process doubled the h-index value for F. W. Lancaster from 13 to 26, which is a much more realistic value for an information scientist and professor of his stature.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft 'The Influence of F. W. Lancaster on Information Science and on Libraries', das als Festschrift für F.W. Lancaster deklariert ist.
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.02172897 = product of:
0.04345794 = sum of:
0.04345794 = product of:
0.08691588 = sum of:
0.08691588 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691588 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.02
0.021510584 = product of:
0.04302117 = sum of:
0.04302117 = product of:
0.08604234 = sum of:
0.08604234 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08604234 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.02
0.021510584 = product of:
0.04302117 = sum of:
0.04302117 = product of:
0.08604234 = sum of:
0.08604234 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08604234 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990)
0.02
0.021510584 = product of:
0.04302117 = sum of:
0.04302117 = product of:
0.08604234 = sum of:
0.08604234 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08604234 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:55
-
Katsaros, D.; Akritidis, L.; Bozanis, P.: ¬The f index : quantifying the impact of coterminal citations on scientists' ranking (2009)
0.02
0.020685881 = product of:
0.041371763 = sum of:
0.041371763 = product of:
0.082743526 = sum of:
0.082743526 = weight(_text_:f in 2805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082743526 = score(doc=2805,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.04536168 = queryNorm
0.45764732 = fieldWeight in 2805, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2805)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Designing fair and unbiased metrics to measure the level of excellence of a scientist is a very significant task because they recently also have been taken into account when deciding faculty promotions, when allocating funds, and so on. Despite criticism that such scientometric evaluators are confronted with, they do have their merits, and efforts should be spent to arm them with robustness and resistance to manipulation. This article aims at initiating the study of the coterminal citations - their existence and implications - and presents them as a generalization of self-citations and of co-citation; it also shows how they can be used to capture any manipulation attempts against scientometric indicators, and finally presents a new index, the f index, that takes into account the coterminal citations. The utility of the new index is validated using the academic production of a number of esteemed computer scientists. The results confirm that the new index can discriminate those individuals whose work penetrates many scientific communities.
- Object
- f-Index
