Search (275 results, page 2 of 14)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Sandison, A.: Thinking about citation analysis (1989) 0.00
    0.0047838427 = product of:
      0.009567685 = sum of:
        0.009567685 = product of:
          0.01913537 = sum of:
            0.01913537 = weight(_text_:a in 6888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01913537 = score(doc=6888,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.36032718 = fieldWeight in 6888, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Mendez, A.: Some considerations on the retrieval of literature based on citations (1978) 0.00
    0.003827074 = product of:
      0.007654148 = sum of:
        0.007654148 = product of:
          0.015308296 = sum of:
            0.015308296 = weight(_text_:a in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015308296 = score(doc=778,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  3. Garfield, E.: Is citation analysis a legitime evaluation tool? (1979) 0.00
    0.003827074 = product of:
      0.007654148 = sum of:
        0.007654148 = product of:
          0.015308296 = sum of:
            0.015308296 = weight(_text_:a in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015308296 = score(doc=1086,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  4. Vinkler, P.: ¬A quasi-quantitative citation model (1987) 0.00
    0.003827074 = product of:
      0.007654148 = sum of:
        0.007654148 = product of:
          0.015308296 = sum of:
            0.015308296 = weight(_text_:a in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015308296 = score(doc=2299,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  5. Peritz, B.C.: Citation characteristics in library science : some further results from a bibliometric survey (1981) 0.00
    0.003827074 = product of:
      0.007654148 = sum of:
        0.007654148 = product of:
          0.015308296 = sum of:
            0.015308296 = weight(_text_:a in 4170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015308296 = score(doc=4170,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 4170, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Garfield, E.: Citation indexes for science : a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas (1955) 0.00
    0.003827074 = product of:
      0.007654148 = sum of:
        0.007654148 = product of:
          0.015308296 = sum of:
            0.015308296 = weight(_text_:a in 4342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015308296 = score(doc=4342,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 4342, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4342)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  7. Malin, M.V.: ¬The Science Citation Index : a new concept in indexing (1968) 0.00
    0.003827074 = product of:
      0.007654148 = sum of:
        0.007654148 = product of:
          0.015308296 = sum of:
            0.015308296 = weight(_text_:a in 5000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015308296 = score(doc=5000,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 5000, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  8. Trivison, D.: Term co-occurrence in cited/citing journal articles as a measure of document similarity (1987) 0.00
    0.003827074 = product of:
      0.007654148 = sum of:
        0.007654148 = product of:
          0.015308296 = sum of:
            0.015308296 = weight(_text_:a in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015308296 = score(doc=5656,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  9. MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Problems of citation analysis : a critical review (1989) 0.00
    0.003827074 = product of:
      0.007654148 = sum of:
        0.007654148 = product of:
          0.015308296 = sum of:
            0.015308296 = weight(_text_:a in 6901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015308296 = score(doc=6901,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 6901, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  10. McCain, K.W.: Mapping authors in intellectual space : a technical overview (1990) 0.00
    0.003827074 = product of:
      0.007654148 = sum of:
        0.007654148 = product of:
          0.015308296 = sum of:
            0.015308296 = weight(_text_:a in 6903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015308296 = score(doc=6903,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 6903, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6903)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  11. MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Quantitative measures of communication in science : a study of the formal level (1986) 0.00
    0.003827074 = product of:
      0.007654148 = sum of:
        0.007654148 = product of:
          0.015308296 = sum of:
            0.015308296 = weight(_text_:a in 7777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015308296 = score(doc=7777,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 7777, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7777)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  12. Fujigaki, Y.: ¬The citation system : citation networks as repeatedly focusing on difference, continuous re-evaluation, and as persistent knowledge accumulation (1998) 0.00
    0.0035799001 = product of:
      0.0071598003 = sum of:
        0.0071598003 = product of:
          0.014319601 = sum of:
            0.014319601 = weight(_text_:a in 5129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014319601 = score(doc=5129,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 5129, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5129)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    States that it can be shown that claims of a lack of theories of citation are also indicative of a great need for a theory which links science dynamics and measurement. There is a wide gap between qualitative (science dynamics) and quantitative (measurement) approaches. To link them, proposes the use of the citation system, that potentially bridges a gap between measurement and epistemology, by applying system theory to the publication system
    Footnote
    Contribution to a thematic issue devoted to 'Theories of citation?'
    Type
    a
  13. Bayer, A.E.; Smart, J.C.; McLaughlin, G.W.: Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations (1990) 0.00
    0.00334869 = product of:
      0.00669738 = sum of:
        0.00669738 = product of:
          0.01339476 = sum of:
            0.01339476 = weight(_text_:a in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01339476 = score(doc=338,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  14. Peritz, B.C.: ¬A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields (1983) 0.00
    0.00334869 = product of:
      0.00669738 = sum of:
        0.00669738 = product of:
          0.01339476 = sum of:
            0.01339476 = weight(_text_:a in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01339476 = score(doc=3073,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  15. McCain, K.W.: Co-cited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure (1986) 0.00
    0.00334869 = product of:
      0.00669738 = sum of:
        0.00669738 = product of:
          0.01339476 = sum of:
            0.01339476 = weight(_text_:a in 5505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01339476 = score(doc=5505,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 5505, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5505)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  16. He, Y.; Hui, S.C.: Mining a web database for author cocitation analysis (2002) 0.00
    0.00334869 = product of:
      0.00669738 = sum of:
        0.00669738 = product of:
          0.01339476 = sum of:
            0.01339476 = weight(_text_:a in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01339476 = score(doc=2584,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  17. Fong, A.C.M.: Mining a Web citation database for document clustering (2002) 0.00
    0.00334869 = product of:
      0.00669738 = sum of:
        0.00669738 = product of:
          0.01339476 = sum of:
            0.01339476 = weight(_text_:a in 3940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01339476 = score(doc=3940,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3940, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3940)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  18. Sen, B.K.; Pandalai, T.A.; Karanjai, A.: Ranking of scientists - a new approach (1998) 0.00
    0.0033143433 = product of:
      0.0066286866 = sum of:
        0.0066286866 = product of:
          0.013257373 = sum of:
            0.013257373 = weight(_text_:a in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013257373 = score(doc=5113,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A formula for the ranking of scientists based on diachronous citation counts is proposed. The paper generalises the fact that the citation generation potential (CGP) is not the same for all papers, it differs from paper to paper, and also to a certain extent depends on the subject domain of the papers. The method of ranking proposed in no way replaces peer review. It merely acts as an aid for peers to help them arrive at a better judgement.
    Type
    a
  19. Yoon, L.L.: ¬The performance of cited references as an approach to information retrieval (1994) 0.00
    0.0031324127 = product of:
      0.0062648254 = sum of:
        0.0062648254 = product of:
          0.012529651 = sum of:
            0.012529651 = weight(_text_:a in 8219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012529651 = score(doc=8219,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 8219, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the relationship between the number of cited references used in a citation search and retrieval effectiveness. Focuses on analysing in terms of information retrieval effectiveness, the overlap among posting sets retrieved by various combinations of cited references. Findings from three case studies show the more cited references used for a citation search, the better the performance, in terms of retrieving more relevant documents, up to a point of diminishing returns. The overall level of overlap among relevant documents sets was found to be low. If only some of the cited references among many candidates are used for a citation search, a significant proportion of relevant documents may be missed. The characteristics of cited references showed that some variables are good indicators to predict relevance to a given question
    Type
    a
  20. Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003) 0.00
    0.0030255679 = product of:
      0.0060511357 = sum of:
        0.0060511357 = product of:
          0.012102271 = sum of:
            0.012102271 = weight(_text_:a in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012102271 = score(doc=1606,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses the rationale for creating historiographs of scholarly topics using a new program called HistCite(TM), which produces a variety of analyses to aid the historian identify key events (papers), people (authors), and journals in a field. By creating a genealogic profile of the evolution, the program aids the scholar in evaluating the paradigm involved.
    Type
    a

Languages

  • e 235
  • d 38
  • chi 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 272
  • el 8
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Classifications