Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.07914778 = sum of:
  0.06368022 = product of:
    0.25472087 = sum of:
      0.25472087 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.25472087 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.38847893 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045821942 = queryNorm
          0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.015467559 = product of:
    0.030935118 = sum of:
      0.030935118 = weight(_text_:h in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030935118 = score(doc=5955,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045821942 = queryNorm
          0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.0062498376 = product of:
  0.012499675 = sum of:
    0.012499675 = product of:
      0.02499935 = sum of:
        0.02499935 = weight(_text_:h in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02499935 = score(doc=4872,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

ABI-Technik. 34(2014) H.1, S.2-8

0.005468608 = product of:
  0.010937216 = sum of:
    0.010937216 = product of:
      0.021874432 = sum of:
        0.021874432 = weight(_text_:h in 5836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021874432 = score(doc=5836,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5836, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5836)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 43(2019) H.2, S.255-261

0.005468608 = product of:
  0.010937216 = sum of:
    0.010937216 = product of:
      0.021874432 = sum of:
        0.021874432 = weight(_text_:h in 5852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021874432 = score(doc=5852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5852)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Auch unter: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21248.07688. Auch in: International Forum on Information. 44(2019) H.4, S.25-35 (http://lamb.viniti.ru/sid2/sid2free?sid2=J18357463. Zunächst auch: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41860839 bzw. http://www.viniti.ru/products/publications/pub-134048#issues [http://catalog.viniti.ru/srch_result.aspx?IRL=FETCH+QUERY%3d2603664+OBJ%3d01bsmm7z+STYLE%3dFull1&TYP=FULL1]).

0.004687378 = product of:
  0.009374756 = sum of:
    0.009374756 = product of:
      0.018749513 = sum of:
        0.018749513 = weight(_text_:h in 4311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018749513 = score(doc=4311,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 4311, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4311)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Automatic content indexing is one of the innovations that are increasingly changing the way libraries work. In theory, it promises a cataloguing service that would hardly be possible with humans in terms of speed, quantity and maybe quality. The German National Library (DNB) has also recognised this potential and is increasingly relying on the automatic indexing of their catalogue content. The DNB took a major step in this direction in 2017, which was announced in two papers. The announcement was rather restrained, but the content of the papers is all the more explosive for the library community: Since September 2017, the DNB has discontinued the intellectual indexing of series Band H and has switched to an automatic process for these series. The subject indexing of online publications (series O) has been purely automatical since 2010; from September 2017, monographs and periodicals published outside the publishing industry and university publications will no longer be indexed by people. This raises the question: What is the quality of the automatic indexing compared to the manual work or in other words to which degree can the automatic indexing replace people without a signi cant drop in regards to quality?

0.0039061487 = product of:
  0.0078122974 = sum of:
    0.0078122974 = product of:
      0.015624595 = sum of:
        0.015624595 = weight(_text_:h in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015624595 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: ABI Technik 32(2012) H.2, S.113-114 (F. Förster)