Search (37 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.05 
    0.04548587 = product of:
  0.09097174 = sum of:
    0.09097174 = product of:
      0.36388695 = sum of:
        0.36388695 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36388695 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38847893 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Dowding, H.; Gengenbach, M.; Graham, B.; Meister, S.; Moran, J.; Peltzman, S.; Seifert, J.; Waugh, D.: OSS4EVA: using open-source tools to fulfill digital preservation requirements (2016) 0.02 
    0.0233329 = product of:
  0.0466658 = sum of:
    0.0466658 = sum of:
      0.015624595 = weight(_text_:h in 3200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.015624595 = score(doc=3200,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045821942 = queryNorm
          0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 3200, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3200)
      0.031041203 = weight(_text_:22 in 3200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031041203 = score(doc=3200,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045821942 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3200, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3200)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    28.10.2016 18:22:33
  3. Calculating the h-index : Web of Science, Scopus or Google Scholar? (2011) 0.02 
    0.015624595 = product of:
  0.03124919 = sum of:
    0.03124919 = product of:
      0.06249838 = sum of:
        0.06249838 = weight(_text_:h in 854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06249838 = score(doc=854,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.5489909 = fieldWeight in 854, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=854)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Gegenüberstellung der Berechnung des h-Index in den drei Tools mit Beispiel Stephen Hawking (WoS: 59, Scopus: 19, Google Scholar: 76)
    Object
    h-index
    Source
    https://dspace.ndlr.ie/jspui/bitstream/10633/27353/9/H%20index%20datasheet.pdf
  4. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.02 
    0.0155206015 = product of:
  0.031041203 = sum of:
    0.031041203 = product of:
      0.062082406 = sum of:
        0.062082406 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062082406 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57
  5. Sojka, P.; Liska, M.: ¬The art of mathematics retrieval (2011) 0.02 
    0.015364612 = product of:
  0.030729225 = sum of:
    0.030729225 = product of:
      0.06145845 = sum of:
        0.06145845 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06145845 = score(doc=3450,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: DocEng2011, September 19-22, 2011, Mountain View, California, USA Copyright 2011 ACM 978-1-4503-0863-2/11/09
    Date
    22. 2.2017 13:00:42
  6. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.01 
    0.013169668 = product of:
  0.026339335 = sum of:
    0.026339335 = product of:
      0.05267867 = sum of:
        0.05267867 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05267867 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  7. Schreiber, M.: Restricting the h-index to a citation time window : a case study of a timed Hirsch index (2014) 0.01 
    0.012499675 = product of:
  0.02499935 = sum of:
    0.02499935 = product of:
      0.0499987 = sum of:
        0.0499987 = weight(_text_:h in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0499987 = score(doc=1563,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The h-index has been shown to increase in many cases mostly because of citations to rather old publications. This inertia can be circumvented by restricting the evaluation to a citation time window. Here I report results of an empirical study analyzing the evolution of the thus defined timed h-index in dependence on the length of the citation time window.
    Object
    h-index
  8. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01 
    0.012416481 = product of:
  0.024832962 = sum of:
    0.024832962 = product of:
      0.049665924 = sum of:
        0.049665924 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049665924 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  9. Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010) 0.01 
    0.009312361 = product of:
  0.018624721 = sum of:
    0.018624721 = product of:
      0.037249442 = sum of:
        0.037249442 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037249442 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:40:22
  10. Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016) 0.01 
    0.009312361 = product of:
  0.018624721 = sum of:
    0.018624721 = product of:
      0.037249442 = sum of:
        0.037249442 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037249442 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    17. 5.2016 19:22:40
  11. Voß, J.: Classification of knowledge organization systems with Wikidata (2016) 0.01 
    0.009312361 = product of:
  0.018624721 = sum of:
    0.018624721 = product of:
      0.037249442 = sum of:
        0.037249442 = weight(_text_:22 in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037249442 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.15-22
  12. Zanibbi, R.; Yuan, B.: Keyword and image-based retrieval for mathematical expressions (2011) 0.01 
    0.009312361 = product of:
  0.018624721 = sum of:
    0.018624721 = product of:
      0.037249442 = sum of:
        0.037249442 = weight(_text_:22 in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037249442 = score(doc=3449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:53:49
  13. Snajder, J.: Distributional semantics of multi-word expressions (2013) 0.01 
    0.0078122974 = product of:
  0.015624595 = sum of:
    0.015624595 = product of:
      0.03124919 = sum of:
        0.03124919 = weight(_text_:h in 2868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03124919 = score(doc=2868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 2868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2868)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Folien einer Präsentation anlässlich COST Action IC1207 PARSEME Meeting, Warsaw, September 16, 2013. Vgl. den Beitrag: Snajder, J., P. Almic: Modeling semantic compositionality of Croatian multiword expressions. In: Informatica. 39(2015) H.3, S.301-309.
  14. Open MIND (2015) 0.01 
    0.0077603008 = product of:
  0.0155206015 = sum of:
    0.0155206015 = product of:
      0.031041203 = sum of:
        0.031041203 = weight(_text_:22 in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031041203 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 1.2015 11:48:22
  15. Roy, W.; Gray, C.: Preparing existing metadata for repository batch import : a recipe for a fickle food (2018) 0.01 
    0.0077603008 = product of:
  0.0155206015 = sum of:
    0.0155206015 = product of:
      0.031041203 = sum of:
        0.031041203 = weight(_text_:22 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031041203 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10.11.2018 16:27:22
  16. Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018) 0.01 
    0.0077603008 = product of:
  0.0155206015 = sum of:
    0.0155206015 = product of:
      0.031041203 = sum of:
        0.031041203 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031041203 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16.11.2018 14:22:01
  17. Hodson, H.: Google's fact-checking bots build vast knowledge bank (2014) 0.01 
    0.0062498376 = product of:
  0.012499675 = sum of:
    0.012499675 = product of:
      0.02499935 = sum of:
        0.02499935 = weight(_text_:h in 1700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02499935 = score(doc=1700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1700)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  18. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.01 
    0.0062082405 = product of:
  0.012416481 = sum of:
    0.012416481 = product of:
      0.024832962 = sum of:
        0.024832962 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024832962 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16046064 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  19. Gábor, K.; Zargayouna, H.; Tellier, I.; Buscaldi, D.; Charnois, T.: ¬A typology of semantic relations dedicated to scientific literature analysis (2016) 0.01 
    0.005468608 = product of:
  0.010937216 = sum of:
    0.010937216 = product of:
      0.021874432 = sum of:
        0.021874432 = weight(_text_:h in 2933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021874432 = score(doc=2933,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 2933, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2933)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  20. Wright, H.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2018) 0.01 
    0.005468608 = product of:
  0.010937216 = sum of:
    0.010937216 = product of:
      0.021874432 = sum of:
        0.021874432 = weight(_text_:h in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021874432 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045821942 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Types

  • a 27
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes