-
Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013)
0.06
0.059718367 = product of:
0.11943673 = sum of:
0.11943673 = sum of:
0.035200592 = weight(_text_:j in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035200592 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.041482817 = weight(_text_:c in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041482817 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.042753324 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042753324 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Eine englische Version dieses Beitrags erscheint unter dem Titel "International visibility of European and in particular German language publications in library and information science" im Tagungsband des 13. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2013). Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2013.64.issue-1/iwp-2013-0001/iwp-2013-0001.xml?format=INT.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 14:04:09
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.06
0.05939346 = product of:
0.11878692 = sum of:
0.11878692 = product of:
0.17818038 = sum of:
0.0804585 = weight(_text_:j in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0804585 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.09772188 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09772188 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.06
0.05939346 = product of:
0.11878692 = sum of:
0.11878692 = product of:
0.17818038 = sum of:
0.0804585 = weight(_text_:j in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0804585 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.09772188 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09772188 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Wang, C.: Bibliometrics : a textbook (1990)
0.04
0.043819096 = product of:
0.08763819 = sum of:
0.08763819 = product of:
0.13145728 = sum of:
0.060343876 = weight(_text_:j in 5040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060343876 = score(doc=5040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.4212805 = fieldWeight in 5040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5040)
0.07111341 = weight(_text_:c in 5040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07111341 = score(doc=5040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 5040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5040)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of information, communication, and library science. 2(1995) no.2, S.84-85 (J. Qin)
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.03
0.03274391 = product of:
0.06548782 = sum of:
0.06548782 = product of:
0.09823172 = sum of:
0.06158602 = weight(_text_:c in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06158602 = score(doc=1352,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.3960601 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.036645703 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036645703 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
-
Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995)
0.03
0.03208996 = product of:
0.06417992 = sum of:
0.06417992 = product of:
0.096269876 = sum of:
0.04740894 = weight(_text_:c in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04740894 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.04886094 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04886094 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
-
Chen, C.-M.: Classification of scientific networks using aggregated journal-journal citation relations in the Journal Citation Reports (2008)
0.03
0.030406265 = product of:
0.06081253 = sum of:
0.06081253 = product of:
0.09121879 = sum of:
0.06158821 = weight(_text_:j in 2690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06158821 = score(doc=2690,freq=12.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.4299676 = fieldWeight in 2690, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2690)
0.029630585 = weight(_text_:c in 2690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029630585 = score(doc=2690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2690)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- I propose an approach to classifying scientific networks in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations of the ISI Journal Citation Reports using the affinity propagation method. This algorithm is applied to obtain the classification of SCI and SSCI journals by minimizing intracategory journal-journal (J-J) distances in the database, where distance between journals is calculated from the similarity of their annual citation patterns with a cutoff parameter, t, to restrain the maximal J-J distance. As demonstrated in the classification of SCI journals, classification of scientific networks with different resolution is possible by choosing proper values of t. Twenty journal categories in SCI are found to be stable despite a difference of an order of magnitude in t. In our classifications, the level of specificity of a category can be found by looking at its value of RJ (the average distance of members of a category to its representative journal), and relatedness of category members is implied by the value of DJ-J (the average DJ-J distance within a category). Our results are consistent with the ISI classification scheme, and the level of relatedness for most categories in our classification is higher than their counterpart in the ISI classification scheme.
-
Liu, M.; Bu, Y.; Chen, C.; Xu, J.; Li, D.; Leng, Y.; Freeman, R.B.; Meyer, E.T.; Yoon, W.; Sung, M.; Jeong, M.; Lee, J.; Kang, J.; Min, C.; Zhai, Y.; Song, M.; Ding, Y.: Pandemics are catalysts of scientific novelty : evidence from COVID-19 (2022)
0.03
0.028484475 = product of:
0.05696895 = sum of:
0.05696895 = product of:
0.08545342 = sum of:
0.04354944 = weight(_text_:j in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04354944 = score(doc=633,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.304033 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
0.04190398 = weight(_text_:c in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04190398 = score(doc=633,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Schlögl, C.; Gorraiz, J.; Bart, C.; Bargmann, M.: Messen und gemessen werden : Möglichkeiten und Grenzen quantitativer Forschungsevaluierungen am Beispiel eines Institutsvergleichs (2001)
0.03
0.026818905 = product of:
0.05363781 = sum of:
0.05363781 = product of:
0.08045671 = sum of:
0.030171938 = weight(_text_:j in 5958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030171938 = score(doc=5958,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5958, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5958)
0.050284773 = weight(_text_:c in 5958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050284773 = score(doc=5958,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.32338172 = fieldWeight in 5958, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5958)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Chen, C.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.; Hou, J.: ¬The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters : a multiple-perspective cocitation analysis (2010)
0.03
0.026818905 = product of:
0.05363781 = sum of:
0.05363781 = product of:
0.08045671 = sum of:
0.030171938 = weight(_text_:j in 3591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030171938 = score(doc=3591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3591)
0.050284773 = weight(_text_:c in 3591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050284773 = score(doc=3591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.32338172 = fieldWeight in 3591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3591)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis method is introduced for characterizing and interpreting the structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters. The method facilitates analytic and sense making tasks by integrating network visualization, spectral clustering, automatic cluster labeling, and text summarization. Cocitation networks are decomposed into cocitation clusters. The interpretation of these clusters is augmented by automatic cluster labeling and summarization. The method focuses on the interrelations between a cocitation cluster's members and their citers. The generic method is applied to a three-part analysis of the field of information science as defined by 12 journals published between 1996 and 2008: (a) a comparative author cocitation analysis (ACA), (b) a progressive ACA of a time series of cocitation networks, and (c) a progressive document cocitation analysis (DCA). Results show that the multiple-perspective method increases the interpretability and accountability of both ACA and DCA networks.
-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.03
0.026438423 = product of:
0.052876845 = sum of:
0.052876845 = product of:
0.07931527 = sum of:
0.042669564 = weight(_text_:j in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042669564 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.036645703 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036645703 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2012.63.issue-3/iwp-2012-0037/iwp-2012-0037.xml?format=INT.
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The ripple effect : citation chain reactions of a nobel prize (2013)
0.03
0.026438423 = product of:
0.052876845 = sum of:
0.052876845 = product of:
0.07931527 = sum of:
0.042669564 = weight(_text_:j in 654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042669564 = score(doc=654,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 654, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=654)
0.036645703 = weight(_text_:22 in 654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036645703 = score(doc=654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=654)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper explores the possible citation chain reactions of a Nobel Prize using the mathematician Robert J. Aumann as a case example. The results show that the award of the Nobel Prize in 2005 affected not only the citations to his work, but also affected the citations to the references in his scientific oeuvre. The results indicate that the spillover effect is almost as powerful as the effect itself. We are consequently able to document a ripple effect in which the awarding of the Nobel Prize ignites a citation chain reaction to Aumann's scientific oeuvre and to the references in its nearest citation network. The effect is discussed using innovation decision process theory as a point of departure to identify the factors that created a bandwagon effect leading to the reported observations.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 16:21:09
-
Chen, C.; Kuljis, J.: ¬The rising landscape : a visual exploration of superstring revolutions in physics (2003)
0.03
0.025561137 = product of:
0.051122274 = sum of:
0.051122274 = product of:
0.07668341 = sum of:
0.035200592 = weight(_text_:j in 1469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035200592 = score(doc=1469,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 1469, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1469)
0.041482817 = weight(_text_:c in 1469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041482817 = score(doc=1469,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 1469, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1469)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Schlögl, C.; Gorraiz, J.: Sind Downloads die besseren Zeitschriftennutzungsdaten? : Ein Vergleich von Download- und Zitationsidikatoren (2012)
0.03
0.025561137 = product of:
0.051122274 = sum of:
0.051122274 = product of:
0.07668341 = sum of:
0.035200592 = weight(_text_:j in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035200592 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.041482817 = weight(_text_:c in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041482817 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006)
0.02
0.024147358 = product of:
0.048294716 = sum of:
0.048294716 = product of:
0.07244207 = sum of:
0.04190398 = weight(_text_:c in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04190398 = score(doc=5272,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.030538088 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030538088 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article describes the latest development of a generic approach to detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. The work makes substantial theoretical and methodological contributions to progressive knowledge domain visualization. A specialty is conceptualized and visualized as a time-variant duality between two fundamental concepts in information science: research fronts and intellectual bases. A research front is defined as an emergent and transient grouping of concepts and underlying research issues. The intellectual base of a research front is its citation and co-citation footprint in scientific literature - an evolving network of scientific publications cited by research-front concepts. Kleinberg's (2002) burst-detection algorithm is adapted to identify emergent research-front concepts. Freeman's (1979) betweenness centrality metric is used to highlight potential pivotal points of paradigm shift over time. Two complementary visualization views are designed and implemented: cluster views and time-zone views. The contributions of the approach are that (a) the nature of an intellectual base is algorithmically and temporally identified by emergent research-front terms, (b) the value of a co-citation cluster is explicitly interpreted in terms of research-front concepts, and (c) visually prominent and algorithmically detected pivotal points substantially reduce the complexity of a visualized network. The modeling and visualization process is implemented in CiteSpace II, a Java application, and applied to the analysis of two research fields: mass extinction (1981-2004) and terrorism (1990-2003). Prominent trends and pivotal points in visualized networks were verified in collaboration with domain experts, who are the authors of pivotal-point articles. Practical implications of the work are discussed. A number of challenges and opportunities for future studies are identified.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:11:05
-
D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011)
0.02
0.024067469 = product of:
0.048134938 = sum of:
0.048134938 = product of:
0.07220241 = sum of:
0.035556704 = weight(_text_:c in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035556704 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15549664 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.036645703 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036645703 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:06:52
-
Crespo, J.A.; Herranz, N.; Li, Y.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: ¬The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014)
0.02
0.022776887 = product of:
0.045553774 = sum of:
0.045553774 = product of:
0.06833066 = sum of:
0.02514328 = weight(_text_:j in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02514328 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.043187376 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043187376 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article studies the impact of differences in citation practices at the subfield, or Web of Science subject category level, using the model introduced in Crespo, Li, and Ruiz-Castillo (2013a), according to which the number of citations received by an article depends on its underlying scientific influence and the field to which it belongs. We use the same Thomson Reuters data set of about 4.4 million articles used in Crespo et al. (2013a) to analyze 22 broad fields. The main results are the following: First, when the classification system goes from 22 fields to 219 subfields the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices increases from ?14% at the field level to 18% at the subfield level. Second, we estimate a set of exchange rates (ERs) over a wide [660, 978] citation quantile interval to express the citation counts of articles into the equivalent counts in the all-sciences case. In the fractional case, for example, we find that in 187 of 219 subfields the ERs are reliable in the sense that the coefficient of variation is smaller than or equal to 0.10. Third, in the fractional case the normalization of the raw data using the ERs (or subfield mean citations) as normalization factors reduces the importance of the differences in citation practices from 18% to 3.8% (3.4%) of overall citation inequality. Fourth, the results in the fractional case are essentially replicated when we adopt a multiplicative approach.
-
Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015)
0.02
0.022776887 = product of:
0.045553774 = sum of:
0.045553774 = product of:
0.06833066 = sum of:
0.02514328 = weight(_text_:j in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02514328 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
0.043187376 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043187376 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
17. 9.2018 18:22:23
-
Kreider, J.: ¬The correlation of local citation data with citation data from Journal Citation Reports (1999)
0.02
0.022272548 = product of:
0.044545095 = sum of:
0.044545095 = product of:
0.06681764 = sum of:
0.030171938 = weight(_text_:j in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030171938 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
0.036645703 = weight(_text_:22 in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036645703 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.02
0.022272548 = product of:
0.044545095 = sum of:
0.044545095 = product of:
0.06681764 = sum of:
0.030171938 = weight(_text_:j in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030171938 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14323919 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.036645703 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036645703 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15785989 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04507926 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
