Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Egghe, L."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012) 0.02
    0.017030396 = product of:
      0.025545591 = sum of:
        0.0074149505 = weight(_text_:s in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0074149505 = score(doc=4992,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
        0.018130641 = product of:
          0.05439192 = sum of:
            0.05439192 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05439192 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1405835 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04014573 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    14. 2.2012 12:53:22
    Footnote
    This article corrects: Thoughts on uncitedness: Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies in: JASIST 62(2011) no,8, S.1637-1644.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429
  2. Egghe, L.: Influence of adding or deleting items and sources on the h-index (2010) 0.01
    0.009415352 = product of:
      0.014123027 = sum of:
        0.003145897 = weight(_text_:s in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003145897 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
        0.01097713 = product of:
          0.03293139 = sum of:
            0.03293139 = weight(_text_:29 in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03293139 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14122012 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04014573 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    31. 5.2010 15:02:29
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.370-373
  3. Egghe, L.: Note on a possible decomposition of the h-Index (2013) 0.00
    0.0020972649 = product of:
      0.006291794 = sum of:
        0.006291794 = weight(_text_:s in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006291794 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.871
  4. Egghe, L.: ¬The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010) 0.00
    0.0020972649 = product of:
      0.006291794 = sum of:
        0.006291794 = weight(_text_:s in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006291794 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.65-114
  5. Egghe, L.: Informetric explanation of some Leiden Ranking graphs (2014) 0.00
    0.0019773203 = product of:
      0.005931961 = sum of:
        0.005931961 = weight(_text_:s in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005931961 = score(doc=1236,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The S-shaped functional relation between the mean citation score and the proportion of top 10% publications for the 500 Leiden Ranking universities is explained using results of the shifted Lotka function. Also the concave or convex relation between the proportion of top 100?% publications, for different fractions ?, is explained using the obtained new informetric model.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.737-741
  6. Egghe, L.: ¬A good normalized impact and concentration measure (2014) 0.00
    0.0017477208 = product of:
      0.005243162 = sum of:
        0.005243162 = weight(_text_:s in 1508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005243162 = score(doc=1508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 1508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1508)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.10, S.2052-2054
  7. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011) 0.00
    0.0014829903 = product of:
      0.004448971 = sum of:
        0.004448971 = weight(_text_:s in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004448971 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Erratum. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1637-1644
  8. Egghe, L.: On the relation between the association strength and other similarity measures (2010) 0.00
    0.0013981767 = product of:
      0.0041945297 = sum of:
        0.0041945297 = weight(_text_:s in 3598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041945297 = score(doc=3598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3598)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.7, S.1502-1504
  9. Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018) 0.00
    0.0012358251 = product of:
      0.0037074753 = sum of:
        0.0037074753 = weight(_text_:s in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0037074753 = score(doc=5226,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 70(2019) no.5, S.530-532 (I. Dorsch)
    Pages
    xv, 385 S
  10. Egghe, L.: ¬A new short proof of Naranan's theorem, explaining Lotka's law and Zipf's law (2010) 0.00
    0.0012234044 = product of:
      0.0036702133 = sum of:
        0.0036702133 = weight(_text_:s in 3432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0036702133 = score(doc=3432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3432)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.12, S.2581-2583
  11. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor (2012) 0.00
    0.0012234044 = product of:
      0.0036702133 = sum of:
        0.0036702133 = weight(_text_:s in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0036702133 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.1048-1053
  12. Egghe, L.: Remarks on the paper by A. De Visscher, "what does the g-index really measure?" (2012) 0.00
    0.0012234044 = product of:
      0.0036702133 = sum of:
        0.0036702133 = weight(_text_:s in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0036702133 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.10, S.2118-2121
  13. Egghe, L.: Theory of the topical coverage of multiple databases (2013) 0.00
    0.0012234044 = product of:
      0.0036702133 = sum of:
        0.0036702133 = weight(_text_:s in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0036702133 = score(doc=526,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.1, S.126-131
  14. Egghe, L.; Bornmann, L.: Fallout and miss in journal peer review (2013) 0.00
    0.0012234044 = product of:
      0.0036702133 = sum of:
        0.0036702133 = weight(_text_:s in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0036702133 = score(doc=1759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 69(2013) no.3, S.411-416
  15. Egghe, L.: Good properties of similarity measures and their complementarity (2010) 0.00
    0.0010486324 = product of:
      0.003145897 = sum of:
        0.003145897 = weight(_text_:s in 3993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003145897 = score(doc=3993,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3993, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3993)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.10, S.2151-2160
  16. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Applications of the generalized law of Benford to informetric data (2012) 0.00
    0.0010486324 = product of:
      0.003145897 = sum of:
        0.003145897 = weight(_text_:s in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003145897 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.043647945 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04014573 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.8, S.1662-1665